0
Amazon

Well at least it wasn't a man......

Recommended Posts

The punchline: Republicans are actually breathing a sigh of relief after finding out he was cheating with a woman and not a man.



If I told you that Paul Stanley was caught having an affair with a winsome young blond girl, you probably wouldn't be shocked. Of course, you'd probably be thinking I was talking about the lead singer of KISS. If I told you that Paul Stanley was a God-fearing and gay-hating family values Republican state senator from Tennessee, you'd probably be even less shocked. Par for the course these days, isn't it?

The young girl, McKensie Morrison, was a legislative intern in Stanley's office when the married senator with two children started doing the mattress mambo with her. She's now 22 years old and was, obviously, even younger when this all began. Stanley went to the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation to report he was being blackmailed by Morrison's boyfriend -- then admitted to them that he was having an affair with her.

Oh, you might wanna set your irony meters for their highest possible level (which is "Bill O'Reilly" on mine):

"When you're married, there's a commitment there," Stanley said last year, while discussing legislation to prohibit gay people from adopting children.
In fact, Stanley was the bill's chief sponsor and he introduced the bill in the legislature. And a few days ago he issued a statement saying that it was unfair to speculate that he might have cheated with the young lady because he was the real victim here:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I'm starting to understand why they call this place dorkzone...



So many dorks...... so many adulterers..... living up to that wonderful FAMILY VALUES buzz word... since that is all it really is to so many on the far fringe right:S:S:S:S:S:S

I wonder which preacher will be the next one to be outed by his wife because of his gay lover?????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I wonder which preacher will be the next one to be outed by his wife because of his gay lover?????



Who really cares?

you're such a dork...but I love you.:$

will you be my sugar momma?

...oopps...maybe I better go see that shrink, eh?
Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I'm starting to understand why they call this place dorkzone...



So many dorks...... so many adulterers..... living up to that wonderful FAMILY VALUES buzz word... since that is all it really is to so many on the far fringe right:S:S:S:S:S:S

I wonder which preacher will be the next one to be outed by his wife because of his gay lover?????


Hey, screw women, screw men, just leave the kids alone, MCCAIN!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

It just strengthens the idea I have that politicians, dems or repubs have the morals of an alley cat.


Chuck



Kinda insulting to alley cats, isn't it??:P
"There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy

"~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

It just strengthens the idea I have that politicians, dems or repubs have the morals of an alley cat.



In my 50+ years, I've personally known a number of people who've had extramarital affairs. Thinking back on it, I don't think any of them were politicians.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

It just strengthens the idea I have that politicians, dems or repubs have the morals of an alley cat.



In my 50+ years, I've personally known a number of people who've had extramarital affairs. Thinking back on it, I don't think any of them were politicians.



Sure! We don't think anything of the 'common man' having extra marital affairs, maybe a 'tsk, tsk' but we tend to hold our 'leaders' above that. We are 'supposed' to look to them as good examples of how leaders should be. Politicians just continue to prove they are no better than the 'common man'... probably much worse!


Chuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/afghanmission/article/816654--grounding-a-rising-military-star?bn=1

Quote

Grounding a rising military star
Ousted general faces potential court martial over alleged relationship with female soldier


This weekend's sudden sacking of Canada's top soldier in Afghanistan over allegations of an inappropriate relationship with a female soldier has shocked the Canadian military and seemingly grounded the career of a rising star.

Brig.-Gen. Daniel Ménard, who is married with two children, was relieved of his command in Afghanistan after military brass became aware of allegations he was involved in an intimate relationship with a female member of his staff.



Speaking of military leaders, most historians' consensus is that when then-Gen. Dwight Eisenhower, a married man, was Supreme Allied Commander in Europe during WWII, he probably was having an affair with his aide, Kay Summersby.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

It just strengthens the idea I have that politicians, dems or repubs have the morals of an alley cat.



In my 50+ years, I've personally known a number of people who've had extramarital affairs. Thinking back on it, I don't think any of them were politicians.


Sure! We don't think anything of the 'common man' having extra marital affairs, maybe a 'tsk, tsk' but we tend to hold our 'leaders' above that. We are 'supposed' to look to them as good examples of how leaders should be. Politicians just continue to prove they are no better than the 'common man'... probably much worse!


Chuck



I think for me its the moral hypocrisy they display.

They pander to the BASE..who want to hear that FAMILY VALUES buzzword tossed at them as a sign thta this is a safe vote for all that is good and holy.

I guess I am just not a big fan of following ......especially those who live by do as I say.... not as they do. Then again.. it seems a VERY large percentage just do as they do anyway.[:/]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

It just strengthens the idea I have that politicians, dems or repubs have the morals of an alley cat.



In my 50+ years, I've personally known a number of people who've had extramarital affairs. Thinking back on it, I don't think any of them were politicians.


Sure! We don't think anything of the 'common man' having extra marital affairs, maybe a 'tsk, tsk' but we tend to hold our 'leaders' above that. We are 'supposed' to look to them as good examples of how leaders should be. Politicians just continue to prove they are no better than the 'common man'... probably much worse!


Chuck



I think for me its the moral hypocrisy they display.

They pander to the BASE..who want to hear that FAMILY VALUES buzzword tossed at them as a sign thta this is a safe vote for all that is good and holy.

I guess I am just not a big fan of following ......especially those who live by do as I say.... not as they do. Then again.. it seems a VERY large percentage just do as they do anyway.[:/]


The no good sons of bitches would sell their mother for a vote!


Chuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/afghanmission/article/816654--grounding-a-rising-military-star?bn=1

Quote

Grounding a rising military star
Ousted general faces potential court martial over alleged relationship with female soldier


This weekend's sudden sacking of Canada's top soldier in Afghanistan over allegations of an inappropriate relationship with a female soldier has shocked the Canadian military and seemingly grounded the career of a rising star.

Brig.-Gen. Daniel Ménard, who is married with two children, was relieved of his command in Afghanistan after military brass became aware of allegations he was involved in an intimate relationship with a female member of his staff.



Speaking of military leaders, most historians' consensus is that when then-Gen. Dwight Eisenhower, a married man, was Supreme Allied Commander in Europe during WWII, he probably was having an affair with his aide, Kay Summersby.


You say 'probably'. O.k., counselor... no real proof on this one. No 'hard evidence'. We'll have to let this one slide.:D


Chuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I'm starting to understand why they call this place dorkzone...



So many dorks...... so many adulterers..... living up to that wonderful FAMILY VALUES buzz word... since that is all it really is to so many on the far fringe right:S:S:S:S:S:S

you forgot about Bill Clinton ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

You say 'probably'. O.k., counselor... no real proof on this one. No 'hard evidence'. We'll have to let this one slide.



There are quite a few historical scholarly writings about this. Rather than just cavalierly dismissing it the way you just did, why don't you Google the issue, read some of the papers with an open, critical and scholarly objective mind, and then draw your own conclusions?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

I'm starting to understand why they call this place dorkzone...



So many dorks...... so many adulterers..... living up to that wonderful FAMILY VALUES buzz word... since that is all it really is to so many on the far fringe right:S:S:S:S:S:S

you forgot about Bill Clinton ;)


He's too obvious! :D


Chuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

I'm starting to understand why they call this place dorkzone...



So many dorks...... so many adulterers..... living up to that wonderful FAMILY VALUES buzz word... since that is all it really is to so many on the far fringe right:S:S:S:S:S:S

you forgot about Bill Clinton ;)


Bill Clinton didn't campaign on a foundation of conservative family values. However, adulterers Ronald Reagan, Bob Dole and Newt Gingrich all did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

I'm starting to understand why they call this place dorkzone...



So many dorks...... so many adulterers..... living up to that wonderful FAMILY VALUES buzz word... since that is all it really is to so many on the far fringe right:S:S:S:S:S:S

you forgot about Bill Clinton ;)


Bill Clinton didn't campaign on a foundation of conservative family values. However, adulterers Ronald Reagan, Bob Dole and Newt Gingrich all did.


Clinton was crafty! Less explaining to do later.


Chuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

You say 'probably'. O.k., counselor... no real proof on this one. No 'hard evidence'. We'll have to let this one slide.



There are quite a few historical scholarly writings about this. Rather than just cavalierly dismissing it the way you just did, why don't you Google the issue, read some of the papers with an open, critical and scholarly objective mind, and then draw your own conclusions?



I did as you suggested and searched the subject. Just another we looked-up to, only to be let-down. The fact he couldn't 'consumate' the affair doesn't lessen the wrong.


Chuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

I'm starting to understand why they call this place dorkzone...



So many dorks...... so many adulterers..... living up to that wonderful FAMILY VALUES buzz word... since that is all it really is to so many on the far fringe right:S:S:S:S:S:S

you forgot about Bill Clinton ;)


He's too obvious! :D


Chuck


OK, Kennedy, Johnson and Reagan were all philanderers too.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

I'm starting to understand why they call this place dorkzone...



So many dorks...... so many adulterers..... living up to that wonderful FAMILY VALUES buzz word... since that is all it really is to so many on the far fringe right:S:S:S:S:S:S

you forgot about Bill Clinton ;)


He's too obvious! :D


Chuck


OK, Kennedy, Johnson and Reagan were all philanderers too.


They were all jerks for doing it.


Chuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

I'm starting to understand why they call this place dorkzone...



So many dorks...... so many adulterers..... living up to that wonderful FAMILY VALUES buzz word... since that is all it really is to so many on the far fringe right:S:S:S:S:S:S

you forgot about Bill Clinton ;)


He's too obvious! :D


Chuck


OK, Kennedy, Johnson and Reagan were all philanderers too.


They were all jerks for doing it.


Chuck


Thomas Jefferson, Grover Cleveland, Warren Harding.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

I'm starting to understand why they call this place dorkzone...



So many dorks...... so many adulterers..... living up to that wonderful FAMILY VALUES buzz word... since that is all it really is to so many on the far fringe right:S:S:S:S:S:S

you forgot about Bill Clinton ;)


He's too obvious! :D


Chuck


OK, Kennedy, Johnson and Reagan were all philanderers too.


They were all jerks for doing it.


Chuck


Thomas Jefferson, Grover Cleveland, Warren Harding.


I get the drift...
The bottom line is, their actions do not give one the sense they had a strong moral terpitude. If, they cheated on their spouses... where else did they cheat?


Chuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

I'm starting to understand why they call this place dorkzone...



So many dorks...... so many adulterers..... living up to that wonderful FAMILY VALUES buzz word... since that is all it really is to so many on the far fringe right:S:S:S:S:S:S

you forgot about Bill Clinton ;)


He's too obvious! :D


Chuck


OK, Kennedy, Johnson and Reagan were all philanderers too.


They were all jerks for doing it.


Chuck


Thomas Jefferson, Grover Cleveland, Warren Harding.


I get the drift...
The bottom line is, their actions do not give one the sense they had a strong moral terpitude. If, they cheated on their spouses... where else did they cheat?


Chuck


Actually they exhibited pretty serious moral turpitude.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0