Amazon 7 #101 May 29, 2010 Quote Quote COOL ... thanks for proving the point.. add CO2 from volcanic eruptions.. world temps go up... so adding it at hundreds of times what the volcano's have in the past CANT POSSIBLY have any effect Interesting you can't tell us what the feedbacks where for the Minoan, Roman and Medieval Warm periods, but have to concentrate on dinosaur days to even come close to making a point. I dont recall how many cars or heavy industrial inputsthere might have been in any of those 3 time periods that added hundreds of times what even a major caldera eruptive event would.....hmmmmm??? Nope... didn't melt the ice caps( still have the ice there from that time).... didnt melt all the mountain glaciers...but they sure have dissappeared purty fast in the last century I think humans are headed for some interesting times.... because there are so many dumbasses unwilling to do the needfull. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #102 May 29, 2010 Quotebut they sure have dissappeared purty fast in the last century Like Greenland? QuoteI think humans are headed for some interesting times.... because there are so many dumbasses unwilling to do the needfull. I think humans are headed for some interesting times, because there's so many dumbasses demanding that un-needful things be done.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #103 June 2, 2010 Hmm A few here keep refering to NASA as a good reference http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/23800 http://climatology.suite101.com/article.cfm/apollo-mission-a-giant-leap-to-discredit-greenhouse-gas-theory http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/stefan.html QuotePublished online on May 24, 2010, the study argues that the flaw has always lain in Stefan-Boltzmann's equations. The long-trusted formula has been used by climatologists without question - until now. The researchers report that the numbers used in those equations are the “first assumption that climate science makes when predicting the Earth's temperature.” NASA Abandoned Flawed Climate Calculations in 1960’s Siddons, Hertzberg and Schreuder were astonished to find that “the principal method for predicting a planet's temperature is surprisingly arbitrary and simplistic.” That was, they believe, why NASA needed to set aside the blackbody equations when doing their own calculations for the Moon landings. "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #104 June 2, 2010 Hmmm. If you really think that NASA's climate models are simple blackbody calculations, and they ascribe all of the excess heat to greenhouse gases, then you've really bought into the denier bunk. Read the original "Moon Paper". It is a joke. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,119 #105 June 2, 2010 I like this tidbit: "the U.S. space agency may have suppressed evidence from the Apollo Moon landings . . ." I knew it! The next paper will cover NASA's involvement in the demolition of the Twin Towers. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ChangoLanzao 0 #106 June 2, 2010 Quote Hmmm. If you really think that NASA's climate models are simple blackbody calculations, and they ascribe all of the excess heat to greenhouse gases, then you've really bought into the denier bunk. Read the original "Moon Paper". It is a joke. LOL Quote It appears that humans are most likely operating in inner space (the space lab) but outer space, beyond the Van Allen radiation belt, the magnetosphere, 560 miles up, may be too deadly to enter due to solar radiation. If that data proves to be true, Earthmen could not have gone to the moon and returned without some signs of radiation poisoning, cell damage and DNA alteration, and most likely, death from cancer. CLICKY Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #107 June 2, 2010 Quote Quote Hmmm. If you really think that NASA's climate models are simple blackbody calculations, and they ascribe all of the excess heat to greenhouse gases, then you've really bought into the denier bunk. Read the original "Moon Paper". It is a joke. LOL Quote It appears that humans are most likely operating in inner space (the space lab) but outer space, beyond the Van Allen radiation belt, the magnetosphere, 560 miles up, may be too deadly to enter due to solar radiation. If that data proves to be true, Earthmen could not have gone to the moon and returned without some signs of radiation poisoning, cell damage and DNA alteration, and most likely, death from cancer. CLICKY From your link...... Quote More distant travel in space would only be possible with 2 foot thick lead cladding around the conveyance to prevent radiation sickness and death I get the feeling that some of the constipation theorists reallly do need some lead cladded rooms like that to protect the rest of us from their stupidity Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
