Lucky... 0 #26 April 17, 2010 QuoteSo the government taking more of peoples money = better, taking less = worse. Got it. I guess that stands until you produce an example that a major fed tax cut fixed things. If you can dig one out, then try to dig out several. I can produce the opposite in wholesale numbers. QuoteThere are several countries you can move to that will take a very large chunk of your income and provide you with what they think you need in return. That should make you happy. YOU AGAIN FAIL TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE. I would love to move, altho I'm happy with how things are going now. QuoteMy offer to help you move is still open. That would make a lot of us VERY happy. YOU AGAIN FAIL TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE. Sure, wanna pay for it? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhaig 0 #27 April 17, 2010 Quote QuoteYou - like many of the sheople... It's sad that since you cannot make an argument that you must PA. what's ironic, is that in that sentence, you're attacking the poster, not the contents of his post.-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #28 April 17, 2010 Quote Quote Quote You - like many of the sheople... It's sad that since you cannot make an argument that you must PA. what's ironic, is that in that sentence, you're attacking the poster, not the contents of his post. I point out his PA only response, then I go on to post all kinds of arguments. I see yours is only to address people, not issues as well. ________________________________________________ Quote It's not growth, it's recovery. And it's far from constant. GDP going from a a 'shrinkage' from -6.4% to +5.6% is growth, don't know how that isn't. The recovery IS the change from shrinkage to + growth; how is that difficult for you to grasp? The market has constantly grown from a low of 6500 to > 11000; how is that not growth? Quote You - like many of the sheople... It's sad that since you cannot make an argument that you must PA. Quote ...are failing to look at economic fundamentals.... Oh, fundamentals like supply and demand or fundamental indexes like the DJIA, NASDAQ, S&P, Unemp via the BLS, GDP per the BEA / Dept of Commerce. I think I am. Quote The stock market and the economy are not the same thing, nor do they move up/down for the same reasons. Agreed, the DJIA is just a part of the macro-picture. When has the economy done well as the DJIA has substantially shrunk? Never than I can think of. The DJIA has done well as the economy has sucked, but in order for the economy to do well, the market must lead. So just because the market is doing well doesn't automatically mean the economy will do well, but in fascist capitalism we must restore the very rich before the rest can do well. Quote The shit that got us here hasn't been repaired, and longstanding economic improvement won't happen until it is. Yes, I know, we need to cut taxes. Of course it hasb't been repaired, your hero sat back with rose-colored glasses thinking all was well, mine has taken measures to repair this with + results. But as fickle as the politics are, the best we can get is a little relief in a Democracy with presidents turning over as such often intervals. Take your party with that fascist pig fucking things up badly, thne his successor trying in small form to fix things; basically 12 years of hell, then 8 years of relief with Clinton, then 8 years of more hell with your hero. So to look for permanent change is optimistic, esp with on eside really bad at math and history chanting, "It's not fair." Hell, even Andrew Jackson dropped the debt to 0 or to 75M, I've read both and believe the latter. Either way, he fixed and some othe ryahoos fucked it all up. So to look for a permanent fix is to not understand politics. Obama has given us relief. Quote Besides, it's not just the current state of the economy that has the "R's" upset. No but it has to stay in the toilet that your hero stacked with shit in order to prove you and yours right. You and yours are being proven wrong everyday, from teh party who gave us, 'you guys are just whiners about this economy.' Quote It's the marxist takeover of industries and the redistributive policies of the administration that most of them are pissed about. So were you pissed with Eisenhower too? Taxes were left in the 90%'s during his time; was he a redistributionist? Taxes are now in the 35% top brkt, Obama wants to bring them to 40% and you act like that's high. Talk about whiners where is McCains's foul-mouthed aid now? To compare Obama's policies to Carl Marx other than as a metaphor is a joke. As for industries, the auto industry was about to fail, our #5 product, that would kill our limited manuf base if we let it fall. And your hero appropriated and dolled out about 1/2 the bank bailout money, some 300Bish has been recovered under Obama, so you point falls flat again. Quote And there's a lot of "D's" and most every "I" and "L" that are pissed too. Glad you can speak for them, it isn;t as many as you think. Furthermore, the ones that are pissed are pissed at the banks for being irresponsible. Not to mention the hypocrites that are part of the foreclosure mess that bitch at TARP. They would also bitch if Obama watched us roll into the GD II as your hero was doing. _______________________________________________ Care to address any issues, or just here to troll? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Belgian_Draft 0 #29 April 17, 2010 QuoteQuoteSo the government taking more of peoples money = better, taking less = worse. Got it. I guess that stands until you produce an example that a major fed tax cut fixed things. If you can dig one out, then try to dig out several. I can produce the opposite in wholesale numbers. QuoteThere are several countries you can move to that will take a very large chunk of your income and provide you with what they think you need in return. That should make you happy. YOU AGAIN FAIL TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE. I would love to move, altho I'm happy with how things are going now. QuoteMy offer to help you move is still open. That would make a lot of us VERY happy. YOU AGAIN FAIL TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE. Sure, wanna pay for it? According to lucky-nomics we should just give our paycheck to the government and they will give us what they feel we need and everybody will be happy as a clam. Sounds like Communism to me. Is that what you want, lucky? For the USA to become a Communist state? What issue am I failing to address, lucky? You opened the door for discussion of more taxes vs less taxes and that is the issue I have discussed.HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #30 April 18, 2010 QuoteSounds like Communism to me. Is that what you want, lucky? For the USA to become a Communist state? He's stated before that that is EXACTLY what he wants.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
winsor 236 #31 April 18, 2010 QuoteQuoteSounds like Communism to me. Is that what you want, lucky? For the USA to become a Communist state? He's stated before that that is EXACTLY what he wants. Oh, for a killfile. There are some posters who are either morons or take delight in posing as such, but it sure is a waste of time having to skim past their drivel. In any event, who cares what he wants? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chuckakers 426 #32 April 18, 2010 yer funny. Chuck Akers D-10855 Houston, TX Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pirana 0 #33 April 18, 2010 Quote Quote Taxes are historically very low thx to Fascist Ronnie and the ignorant American picture that they should be low. When taxes are low, bad things happen. So the government taking more of peoples money = better, taking less = worse. Got it. There are several countries you can move to that will take a very large chunk of your income and provide you with what they think you need in return. That should make you happy. My offer to help you move is still open. That would make a lot of us VERY happy. That is so far to the left it is humorous. In saying less taxes = bad things and more taxes = good things; that pretty much makes the definition of success: Less personal discretionary income & more government spending. How do people get to a point where less personal choice on what to do with income and more government authority on what people do with their personal income becomes the very definition of sucess? Doesn't it seem at least somewhat absurd that we are approaching the point where the government gets to decide what happens with nearly half of people's personal income? Even if it is only some of the people?" . . . the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
