billvon 3,111
.thumb.jpg.4bb795e2eaf21b8b300039a5e1ec7f92.jpg)
Recommended Posts
maadmax 0
Quote>The assumption that your logic can explain all of the possible
>manifestations of God and the universe is illogical.
Logic doesn't explain everything; it just provides a framework in which to think. (So does religion, but has different objectives i.e. a given belief that one must arrive at.)
And I guess atheistic logic doesn't do that? Seem like what ever logic an atheistic comes up with it always ends in "God does not exist." But maybe if atheism is viewed as just another religion that will not be a problem.
...
billvon 3,111
>And I guess atheistic logic doesn't do that?
If you think there is "atheist" logic then you do not understand logic. It's like claiming that the gravity at your DZ is religious.
>Seem like what ever logic an atheistic comes up with it always ends in
>"God does not exist."
No. But it can identify arguments that have no validity. One such argument is "things exist, therefore someone made them, therefore God exists."
If you think there is "atheist" logic then you do not understand logic. It's like claiming that the gravity at your DZ is religious.
>Seem like what ever logic an atheistic comes up with it always ends in
>"God does not exist."
No. But it can identify arguments that have no validity. One such argument is "things exist, therefore someone made them, therefore God exists."
Quote
That is an absurd absence of logic.
Rather like claiming there must be a creator because something can't come from nothing, without applying the same rule to the creator herself.
The assumption that your logic can explain all of the possible manifestations of God and the universe is illogical.
...
So is just 'making stuff up' with no evidence to support it.
(.)Y(.)
Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome
kallend 2,146
Quote
Repost!
www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=2030647;search_string=britney;#2030647
...
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
Quote>Deciding not to decide is a decision.
Sometimes yes, sometimes no. That guy in a coma really isn't making any decisions, no matter what the semantics. Same generally goes for the guy with an IQ of 60 who doesn't always understand the consequences of his actions.
The guy in the coma is not making any decisions. The guy with the low IQ is making decisions, even if he may not understand the consequences - removing understanding, consequence or responsability from a decision does not disqualify it from being a decision.
rehmwa 2
Quote- removing understanding, consequence or responsability from a decision does not disqualify it from being a decision.
and in liberal arts fields it can net a great career as a 'consultant' or a political correspondant
...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants
>manifestations of God and the universe is illogical.
Logic doesn't explain everything; it just provides a framework in which to think. (So does religion, but has different objectives i.e. a given belief that one must arrive at.)
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites