mnealtx 0 #26 March 20, 2010 QuoteYep, just like this one. However, the righties (including you) kept that thread going for some 250 posts, just looking sillier and sillier with every post. Jokes on you, since we turned out to be right. QuoteI expect this one to die quickly. Probably, unless we keep it open talking about the hate-on that Schleussel has for Hannity.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,230 #27 March 20, 2010 QuoteQuoteYep, just like this one. However, the righties (including you) kept that thread going for some 250 posts, just looking sillier and sillier with every post. Jokes on you, since we turned out to be right. . You are always FAR to the right, what's new? (But not correct except in some RW blogger fantasy).... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #28 March 20, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteYep, just like this one. However, the righties (including you) kept that thread going for some 250 posts, just looking sillier and sillier with every post. Jokes on you, since we turned out to be right. . You are always FAR to the right, what's new? (But not correct except in some RW blogger fantasy). Sucks to be you, since Ms. King's emails snipped above show that, yet again, you liel.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hwt 0 #29 March 21, 2010 Quote Sad for you, I guess, that the Speaker's travel arrangements were required by the non-partisan Sergeant at Arms and approved by the Bush White House, for reasons of "National Security", in USAF aircraft specifically appropriated for such travel. But if it pleases you to keep whining over a non-story... http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/01/11/cbsnews_investigates/main6084364.shtml A non story huh? better tell CBS That. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,230 #30 March 21, 2010 Quote Quote Sad for you, I guess, that the Speaker's travel arrangements were required by the non-partisan Sergeant at Arms and approved by the Bush White House, for reasons of "National Security", in USAF aircraft specifically appropriated for such travel. But if it pleases you to keep whining over a non-story... http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/01/11/cbsnews_investigates/main6084364.shtml A non story huh? better tell CBS That. How does something that happened a couple of months ago affect a lie told some 3 years ago? Have you been studying logic under Rushmc?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,230 #31 March 21, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteYep, just like this one. However, the righties (including you) kept that thread going for some 250 posts, just looking sillier and sillier with every post. Jokes on you, since we turned out to be right. . You are always FAR to the right, what's new? (But not correct except in some RW blogger fantasy). Sucks to be you, since Ms. King's emails snipped above show that, yet again, you liel. Nothing it there speaks to the lies in the Washington Times in 2007, parroted by NCClimber in DZ.COM, to which I referred. Have you been studying logic with rushmc?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #32 March 22, 2010 Quote Quote Sad for you, I guess, that the Speaker's travel arrangements were required by the non-partisan Sergeant at Arms and approved by the Bush White House, for reasons of "National Security", in USAF aircraft specifically appropriated for such travel. But if it pleases you to keep whining over a non-story... http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/01/11/cbsnews_investigates/main6084364.shtml A non story huh? better tell CBS That. Are you sure that isn't CNNBC? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
headoverheels 334 #33 April 2, 2010 I'm not sure you can say that Hannity "stole millions from the children of dead soldiers," but he did misrepresent how much of the concert funds actually went to scholarships -- seems to be in the range of 20-25%. Doesn't sound like "100%" to me. http://www.citizensforethics.org/files/20100329%20-%20HannityFTC%20-%20Complaint%20and%20Exhibits.pdf http://www.citizensforethics.org/files/20100329%20-%20HannityFTC%20-%20Citations.pdf Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #34 April 2, 2010 Quote I'm not sure you can say that Hannity "stole millions from the children of dead soldiers," but he did misrepresent how much of the concert funds actually went to scholarships -- seems to be in the range of 20-25%. Doesn't sound like "100%" to me. http://www.citizensforethics.org/files/20100329%20-%20HannityFTC%20-%20Complaint%20and%20Exhibits.pdf http://www.citizensforethics.org/files/20100329%20-%20HannityFTC%20-%20Citations.pdf I dont know why everyone is in an uproar.. The man needs to make money after all that is what he is in business to do... make money. This is a not a communist country after all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rstanley0312 1 #35 April 2, 2010 Quote Quote I'm not sure you can say that Hannity "stole millions from the children of dead soldiers," but he did misrepresent how much of the concert funds actually went to scholarships -- seems to be in the range of 20-25%. Doesn't sound like "100%" to me. http://www.citizensforethics.org/files/20100329%20-%20HannityFTC%20-%20Complaint%20and%20Exhibits.pdf http://www.citizensforethics.org/files/20100329%20-%20HannityFTC%20-%20Citations.pdf I dont know why everyone is in an uproar.. The man needs to make money after all that is what he is in business to do... make money. This is a not a communist country after all. As always Amazon.... your response as well as Lucky's = pointless. That being said I posted this first and I have to say the evidence points to Hannity doing just what he is being accused of. Look at the tax returns I am a conservative and agree with a lot of what Hannity says although he does anoy the piss out of me a lot because he only hits rhetoric and party line talking points. Schlussel is someone I have fillowed and I do like her writing. I think she does not like Hanity bc of this crap. I will restate what I did in my post about this. She is a conservative and I think she is pissed such a figure for conservative news is doing this. I'm sorry but it looks like Hannity has some serious explaining to do. I really dont give a crap what Ollie North or the organization says either..... what are they supposed to say? How about they actually show me proof this stuff isn't true? I mean we can see tax returns and it shows a hell of a lot spent and not much going to the charity itself..... this is really sad I think. Life is all about ass....either you're kicking it, kissing it, working it off, or trying to get a piece of it. Muff Brother #4382 Dudeist Skydiver #000 www.fundraiseadventure.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #36 April 2, 2010 Can't have it both ways!!!! HE is doing what he does because that is who he is... just like so many of the other vile right wing talking heads who talk a good game... but they are in it for themselves.. TO MAKE MONEY Who is it again who supports them and swallows their shit "HOOK LINE AND SINKER....and then regurgitate it here..daily??????? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rstanley0312 1 #37 April 5, 2010 QuoteCan't have it both ways!!!! HE is doing what he does because that is who he is... just like so many of the other vile right wing talking heads who talk a good game... but they are in it for themselves.. TO MAKE MONEY Who is it again who supports them and swallows their shit "HOOK LINE AND SINKER....and then regurgitate it here..daily??????? Ummm..... not me.... did you even read what I wrote? I am a conservative bc I believe it is what is best for this country NOT bc Hannity says its right. As for your comment about the talking heads on the right.... just as many if not more on the left that are garbage. I love that you think the lefties are so pure..... I do not have a problem seeing there are scumbags on the left and the right. Wake up.... most of them are scum and the politicians are the worst kind. Once again your post = pointless....Life is all about ass....either you're kicking it, kissing it, working it off, or trying to get a piece of it. Muff Brother #4382 Dudeist Skydiver #000 www.fundraiseadventure.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
