Belgian_Draft 0 #101 March 19, 2010 QuoteQuoteWhat the hell are you talking about? I said the BC should be free. That's why I said you have disregarded everything I suggested. I agree with Kallend. Grow up. Since we're discussing growing up, when are YOU going to do so and base your argument on more than wishes and fantasies? Look in a mirror lately? BTW, do you have a concealed carry permit?HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #102 March 19, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteWhat the hell are you talking about? I said the BC should be free. That's why I said you have disregarded everything I suggested. I agree with Kallend. Grow up. Since we're discussing growing up, when are YOU going to do so and base your argument on more than wishes and fantasies? Look in a mirror lately? BTW, do you have a concealed carry permit? Nope, and Texas doesn't have open carry laws, so I don't carry in public. Is there a reason for the question?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Belgian_Draft 0 #103 March 19, 2010 Yep. Because I hear the same argument you are giving- that we shouldn't have to pay to exercise our rights- think nothing of paying out the butt for a required concealed carry course.HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #104 March 19, 2010 QuoteYep. Because I hear the same argument you are giving- that we shouldn't have to pay to exercise our rights- think nothing of paying out the butt for a required concealed carry course. Because that's the only way we *CAN* exercise the right to carry, since the overwhelming majority of us don't live on gun ranges or BLM lands. That, of course, is AFTER jumping through all the existing hoops, regardless of what the anti's are doing to put up more and more of them.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Belgian_Draft 0 #105 March 19, 2010 QuoteQuoteYep. Because I hear the same argument you are giving- that we shouldn't have to pay to exercise our rights- think nothing of paying out the butt for a required concealed carry course. Because that's the only way we *CAN* exercise the right to carry, since the overwhelming majority of us don't live on gun ranges or BLM lands. That, of course, is AFTER jumping through all the existing hoops, regardless of what the anti's are doing to put up more and more of them. To the best of my knowledge you can carry in any fashion you see fit on private property as long as the owner lets you. Like i said in a previous post, you vicinity to a public range or BLM ground is irrelevent to whether or not you can shoot a gun there without a license. Sure it seems like the antis are putting up all the hoops they can. But, on the other hand, the NRA would have no hoops at all. Until both sides quit arguing like school children the debate will go on and on.HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #106 March 19, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteSo you want society to absorb all the costs of your endulgences? First, it's not an indulgence to be able to exercise your rights. Belgian's suggestion will not prevent you from exercising your rights (which, as Scalia noted in Heller, are not unlimited). Then the extra expense of a poll tax doesn't prevent you from exercising your right to vote. Grow up, Mike. We're not the ones promoting poll taxes as legit. Talk about living in the 19th Century. I know you're not that old. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,111 #107 March 19, 2010 >We're not the ones promoting poll taxes as legit. Whoosh! Neither is he. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #108 March 19, 2010 Quote>We're not the ones promoting poll taxes as legit. Whoosh! Neither is he. Until he clarifies his statement that rights aren't unlimited in response to $100 taxes on gun sales, it's quite reasonable to see him supporting poll taxes. I made a clear reference to it at the time. Starting to think you support them, too. What other agenda have you got, Bill? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,111 #109 March 19, 2010 > it's quite reasonable to see him supporting poll taxes. I made a clear > reference to it at the time. I made a clear reference to it at the time. You made a clear reference to supporting poll taxes? Do you support gun sale taxes too, then? (Yes, that's as stupid as your insinuation.) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #110 March 19, 2010 Patriot Act Lover. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,111 #111 March 19, 2010 Gun grabber. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Belgian_Draft 0 #112 March 19, 2010 Quote Gun grabber. That can be interpreted a couple ways. "This is my rifle, this is my gun This is for fighting, this is for fun" HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
