rushmc 23 #26 March 13, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Too funny ... Lucky whines about partisan news organizations and how they are not credible in all sorts of threads today, but then has a URL to the "Huffington Post" in their signature line. That's just the type of stuff that Lucky thinks is legit. I don't think it's legit, it's just a satirical demonstration of how Repubs work. It doesn't detail an issue, it just illustartes a modus operendi. as wiki boy back tracks furiously> "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #27 March 13, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Yes, and OH! There is more From AP found on NewsMax http://newsmax.com/InsideCover/US-Health-Overhaul-Special/2010/03/13/id/352553 You guys can't help yourself, can you? I just ignored a Heritage Foundation post yesterday. Hillarious, some of you guys think wikipedia is BS. Heritage is respected in Washington at least at some level but again you generalize and ignore issues when you have to,. Oh,and the article was AP lucky my boy Then post the AP article. Most likely the AP writeup was extraploated and bastardized to their liking. Respected at some level? Yea, a real low level in a partisan sense. Anyone with a couple braincells knows they are a highly partisan rag, Hannity and Limbaugh refernce them all of the time. Nice try though, keep trying to legitimate them. You sure do drool and fall all over your tongue when your "facts" get thrown back in your face don't you I didn't read your bastardized article. If you would like me to post gov data, I would be glad to, but then you would post HF or Cato. I get it, the gov data keeps crawling up your ass, so you guys have to reference garbage. What else can you do? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #28 March 13, 2010 Go wiki this Lucky Which health care insurance provider is number 1 in claims denied?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #29 March 13, 2010 Quote Quote Quote There are supporting links on the page if you so wish to continue your education http://www.heritage.org/...alth%20Care%20Reform Lucky: Posts gov data Mike, Rush, etc: Posts Heritage Fondation Heritage USES gov data YOU SPIN gov data And so does Moveon I'm sure, then they bastardize it. I don't spin gov data, show where I have ever done that. Oh, you can't. GDP: a year ago -6.4, now +5.9 Market: 10,600, was in freefall when Obama inherited and fell to 6500 Unemp: Was in freefall and at 8% as Obama inherited. Grew by 3.4% from Feb 08 to Feb 09; the year before Obama took office. Kept shooting to 10.1 as it peaked in Oct 09, now down to 9.7% Show me where I'm morphing it. Oh, you can't? Back to HF to get more brainwashed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #30 March 13, 2010 No website or web address? Hmmmm, Mikeism is spreading, huh? From teh party of stolen elections we now have dishonest postings. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #31 March 13, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Quote There are supporting links on the page if you so wish to continue your education http://www.heritage.org/...alth%20Care%20Reform Lucky: Posts gov data Mike, Rush, etc: Posts Heritage Fondation Heritage USES gov data YOU SPIN gov data And so does Moveon I'm sure, then they bastardize it. I don't spin gov data, show where I have ever done that. Oh, you can't. GDP: a year ago -6.4, now +5.9 Market: 10,600, was in freefall when Obama inherited and fell to 6500 Unemp: Was in freefall and at 8% as Obama inherited. Grew by 3.4% from Feb 08 to Feb 09; the year before Obama took office. Kept shooting to 10.1 as it peaked in Oct 09, now down to 9.7% Show me where I'm morphing it. Oh, you can't? Back to HF to get more brainwashed. Yep It is as simple as you postOr it is as simple as you need it to be to understand what you post"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #32 March 13, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Quote Too funny ... Lucky whines about partisan news organizations and how they are not credible in all sorts of threads today, but then has a URL to the "Huffington Post" in their signature line. That's just the type of stuff that Lucky thinks is legit. I don't think it's legit, it's just a satirical demonstration of how Repubs work. It doesn't detail an issue, it just illustartes a modus operendi. as wiki boy back tracks furiously> Nope, That Huffington site is not a Huffington article, it's an SNL skit. Poor try. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #33 March 13, 2010 QuoteGo wiki this Lucky Which health care insurance provider is number 1 in claims denied? If you have a point to make, make it. Whatever point you are trying to make, it is obviously a microcosm of the more global issue of getting everyone HC. Of course, as we all know, the R's don't give a fuck about the masses, so I'm not really referencing them here. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #34 March 13, 2010 Quote Quote Go wiki this Lucky Which health care insurance provider is number 1 in claims denied? If you have a point to make, make it. Whatever point you are trying to make, it is obviously a microcosm of the more global issue of getting everyone HC. Of course, as we all know, the R's don't give a fuck about the masses, so I'm not really referencing them here. You got all the number and you got all the data Answer the question Gotta be on wiki dont you think?? Come on dude. Tell me Which HC provider/insurer denies more claims than any other one?? It has even been answered on another thread You can do it! I have confidence in you. You will not like the answer I will bet"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #35 March 13, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote There are supporting links on the page if you so wish to continue your education http://www.heritage.org/...alth%20Care%20Reform Lucky: Posts gov data Mike, Rush, etc: Posts Heritage Fondation Heritage USES gov data YOU SPIN gov data And so does Moveon I'm sure, then they bastardize it. I don't spin gov data, show where I have ever done that. Oh, you can't. GDP: a year ago -6.4, now +5.9 Market: 10,600, was in freefall when Obama inherited and fell to 6500 Unemp: Was in freefall and at 8% as Obama inherited. Grew by 3.4% from Feb 08 to Feb 09; the year before Obama took office. Kept shooting to 10.1 as it peaked in Oct 09, now down to 9.7% Show me where I'm morphing it. Oh, you can't? Back to HF to get more brainwashed. Yep It is as simple as you postOr it is as simple as you need it to be to understand what you post I've made my assertion, so you have a few options: - Agree - Agree but find another reason why the numbers are looking better - Disagree with an alternative set of numbers - Ask me to prove up these numbers - Etc.... Or, just post highly biased websites with an obvious agenda that take gov data and spin it. Here's an idea, why not take the gov numbers yourself, consult HF and other trash sites, post in your words what they are saying and sell it that way. Of course you can't use HF as a source, so you're out on a ledge if you cannot support your ideas pretty much independently. Give it a try, but it's ridiculous to ask the opposition to accept an agenda site as anything that can be referred to as reliable. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #36 March 13, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote There are supporting links on the page if you so wish to continue your education http://www.heritage.org/...alth%20Care%20Reform Lucky: Posts gov data Mike, Rush, etc: Posts Heritage Fondation Heritage USES gov data YOU SPIN gov data And so does Moveon I'm sure, then they bastardize it. I don't spin gov data, show where I have ever done that. Oh, you can't. GDP: a year ago -6.4, now +5.9 Market: 10,600, was in freefall when Obama inherited and fell to 6500 Unemp: Was in freefall and at 8% as Obama inherited. Grew by 3.4% from Feb 08 to Feb 09; the year before Obama took office. Kept shooting to 10.1 as it peaked in Oct 09, now down to 9.7% Show me where I'm morphing it. Oh, you can't? Back to HF to get more brainwashed. Yep It is as simple as you postOr it is as simple as you need it to be to understand what you post I've made my assertion, so you have a few options: - Agree - Agree but find another reason why the numbers are looking better - Disagree with an alternative set of numbers - Ask me to prove up these numbers - Etc.... Or, just post highly biased websites with an obvious agenda that take gov data and spin it. Here's an idea, why not take the gov numbers yourself, consult HF and other trash sites, post in your words what they are saying and sell it that way. Of course you can't use HF as a source, so you're out on a ledge if you cannot support your ideas pretty much independently. Give it a try, but it's ridiculous to ask the opposition to accept an agenda site as anything that can be referred to as reliable. Didn't get enough sleep last night? Or it it Obama and his flock are looking so corrupt right now it is making you grouchy? Trash websites? and you sig line Huffington puffingtonOh the irony"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #37 March 13, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote There are supporting links on the page if you so wish to continue your education http://www.heritage.org/...alth%20Care%20Reform Lucky: Posts gov data Mike, Rush, etc: Posts Heritage Fondation Heritage USES gov data YOU SPIN gov data And so does Moveon I'm sure, then they bastardize it. I don't spin gov data, show where I have ever done that. Oh, you can't. GDP: a year ago -6.4, now +5.9 Market: 10,600, was in freefall when Obama inherited and fell to 6500 Unemp: Was in freefall and at 8% as Obama inherited. Grew by 3.4% from Feb 08 to Feb 09; the year before Obama took office. Kept shooting to 10.1 as it peaked in Oct 09, now down to 9.7% Show me where I'm morphing it. Oh, you can't? Back to HF to get more brainwashed. Yep It is as simple as you postOr it is as simple as you need it to be to understand what you post I've made my assertion, so you have a few options: - Agree - Agree but find another reason why the numbers are looking better - Disagree with an alternative set of numbers - Ask me to prove up these numbers - Etc.... Or, just post highly biased websites with an obvious agenda that take gov data and spin it. Here's an idea, why not take the gov numbers yourself, consult HF and other trash sites, post in your words what they are saying and sell it that way. Of course you can't use HF as a source, so you're out on a ledge if you cannot support your ideas pretty much independently. Give it a try, but it's ridiculous to ask the opposition to accept an agenda site as anything that can be referred to as reliable. Didn't get enough sleep last night? Or it it Obama and his flock are looking so corrupt right now it is making you grouchy? Trash websites? and you sig line Huffington puffingtonOh the irony Rush, try this again: I've made my assertion, so you have a few options: - Agree - Agree but find another reason why the numbers are looking better - Disagree with an alternative set of numbers - Ask me to prove up these numbers - Etc.... Or, just post highly biased websites with an obvious agenda that take gov data and spin it. Here's an idea, why not take the gov numbers yourself, consult HF and other trash sites, post in your words what they are saying and sell it that way. Of course you can't use HF as a source, so you're out on a ledge if you cannot support your ideas pretty much independently. Give it a try, but it's ridiculous to ask the opposition to accept an agenda site as anything that can be referred to as reliable. - Trash websites? Yes, any agenda site is a sort of trash vs an objective nfo site. - and you sig line Huffington puffington Yes, it's a quick ref to an SNL skit, it's not an article. If you cannot tell the diff, I'm sorry for you. Have you notcied teh flow: - Jan 09: Repubs hope Obama falls on his ass via the economy getting way worse and no signs of recovery in a year. - Feb 10: a year later, the economy is showing huge signs of recovery, the R's are freaking out that gov data spells success for Obama, so they ignore that and turn to sites that morph gov data; enter HF, Cato, etc. Is it really that hard to see? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #38 March 13, 2010 I could give a twat hair less about Obama or any president. Be I sure as hell hopes what he is trying to do with HC does fail And again you twist No republican votes are needed to pass the Senate bill NONE, zero, none Why is it that there is so much trouble in paradise? I submit that some dems still want what is best for the country and not themselves So bitch at your boys, you knnow, the party of can notand the irony of you sig line vs your posts is there and seen by all not withstanding your lame attempts to explain it away "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
timmyfitz 0 #39 March 14, 2010 Quote Quote Quote I just ignored a Heritage Foundation post yesterday For which we were all INCREDIBLY thankful. Quote Hillarious, some of you guys think wikipedia is BS. Hilarious, coming from the guy that thinks the Onion is non-satire. No, I thought it was a RW rag with a satirical, "we're just joking" spin on the homophobia present in most current Repubs. You called the onion video "real and legit". Your words. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #40 March 15, 2010 QuoteNope, That Huffington site is not a Huffington article, it's an SNL skit. Poor try. So, you think SNL and Onion are valid and legitimate political sites - that explains a lot.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
