kallend 2,112 #176 February 25, 2010 It is clear to anyone bothering to read this far that you are absolutely and completely unable to support your claim with any evidence whatsoever. All you have is bluster.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #177 February 25, 2010 Quote It is clear to anyone bothering to read this far that you are absolutely and completely unable to support your claim with any evidence whatsoever. All you have is bluster. Specifics my, friend specifics If you dare to do it yet again"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #178 February 25, 2010 Quote It is clear to anyone bothering to read this far that you are absolutely and completely unable to support your claim with any evidence whatsoever. All you have is bluster. You got the perfect oportunity to prove me a liar sir All you need to is spell out the specifics for your gun issues, as you did in the other thread!If the proposals you specifie(as you did once before) do not make it almost impossible to own a gun and have it avialable for use for self defence then, you have proven me a liar here for all to see Of course the other possiblility is you will have to post something you really dont believe in, which will of course stay on the site, and you will spend time ignoring said items or back tracking I await your specifics"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #179 February 25, 2010 No, no... kallend doesn't want a BAN - he supports enforcing existing laws on guns (after they're changed how he wants them, anyway).Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,112 #180 February 25, 2010 QuoteNo, no... kallend doesn't want a BAN - he supports enforcing existing laws on guns (after they're changed how he wants them, anyway). Explain how tightening the rules on nutters having guns would effectively ban you or rushmc from having a gun. Is there something that you two haven't been telling us? Enquiring minds want to know.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,112 #181 February 25, 2010 QuoteQuote It is clear to anyone bothering to read this far that you are absolutely and completely unable to support your claim with any evidence whatsoever. All you have is bluster. You got the perfect oportunity to prove me a liar sir I already did.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #182 February 25, 2010 QuoteQuoteNo, no... kallend doesn't want a BAN - he supports enforcing existing laws on guns (after they're changed how he wants them, anyway). Explain how tightening the rules on nutters having guns would effectively ban you or rushmc from having a gun. Is there something that you two haven't been telling us? Enquiring minds want to know. Explain how 'enforcing existing laws' includes changing them. Is there some nutter in your family or college that you don't want getting a gun? Enquiring minds want to know.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #183 February 25, 2010 Quote Quote Quote It is clear to anyone bothering to read this far that you are absolutely and completely unable to support your claim with any evidence whatsoever. All you have is bluster. You got the perfect oportunity to prove me a liar sir I already did. ya, right"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,112 #184 February 25, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Quote It is clear to anyone bothering to read this far that you are absolutely and completely unable to support your claim with any evidence whatsoever. All you have is bluster. You got the perfect oportunity to prove me a liar sir I already did. ya, right See post #171. You have provided not one shred of evidence to back your lying claim that I want to ban guns.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #185 February 25, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote It is clear to anyone bothering to read this far that you are absolutely and completely unable to support your claim with any evidence whatsoever. All you have is bluster. You got the perfect oportunity to prove me a liar sir I already did. ya, right See post #171. You have provided not one shred of evidence to back your lying claim that I want to ban guns. specifics my man specifics then you can claim that Otherwise, you are still up to your same old crap"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,112 #186 February 25, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteNo, no... kallend doesn't want a BAN - he supports enforcing existing laws on guns (after they're changed how he wants them, anyway). Explain how tightening the rules on nutters having guns would effectively ban you or rushmc from having a gun. Is there something that you two haven't been telling us? Enquiring minds want to know. Explain how 'enforcing existing laws' includes changing them. Is there some nutter in your family or college that you don't want getting a gun? Enquiring minds want to know. Too embarrassed to answer my question? As a matter of fact I have an alcoholic in my family and I certainly wouldn't want him to have a gun. Right now, thanks to the attitudes of people like you, there is nothing at all to prevent his buying one quite legally.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,112 #187 February 25, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote It is clear to anyone bothering to read this far that you are absolutely and completely unable to support your claim with any evidence whatsoever. All you have is bluster. You got the perfect oportunity to prove me a liar sir I already did. ya, right See post #171. You have provided not one shred of evidence to back your lying claim that I want to ban guns. specifics my man specifics then you can claim that Otherwise, you are still up to your same old crap Specifics (dates, times, quotes) are in post #171. The only person you fool is yourself. I doubt even mnealtx is fooled.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #188 February 25, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteNo, no... kallend doesn't want a BAN - he supports enforcing existing laws on guns (after they're changed how he wants them, anyway). Explain how tightening the rules on nutters having guns would effectively ban you or rushmc from having a gun. Is there something that you two haven't been telling us? Enquiring minds want to know. Explain how 'enforcing existing laws' includes changing them. Is there some nutter in your family or college that you don't want getting a gun? Enquiring minds want to know. Too embarrassed to answer my question? As a matter of fact I have an alcoholic in my family and I certainly wouldn't want him to have a gun. Right now, thanks to the attitudes of people like you, there is nothing at all to prevent his buying one quite legally. So, you support prior restraint and preventing a legal purchase by someone who is NOT barred - this is NOT a surprise to the rest of us, John.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #189 February 25, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote It is clear to anyone bothering to read this far that you are absolutely and completely unable to support your claim with any evidence whatsoever. All you have is bluster. You got the perfect oportunity to prove me a liar sir I already did. ya, right See post #171. You have provided not one shred of evidence to back your lying claim that I want to ban guns. specifics my man specifics then you can claim that Otherwise, you are still up to your same old crap Specifics (dates, times, quotes) are in post #171. The only person you fool is yourself. I doubt even mnealtx is fooled. Having comprehesion problems again ? Specifics sir, thats all it will take Got the guts?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,112 #190 February 25, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteNo, no... kallend doesn't want a BAN - he supports enforcing existing laws on guns (after they're changed how he wants them, anyway). Explain how tightening the rules on nutters having guns would effectively ban you or rushmc from having a gun. Is there something that you two haven't been telling us? Enquiring minds want to know. Explain how 'enforcing existing laws' includes changing them. Is there some nutter in your family or college that you don't want getting a gun? Enquiring minds want to know. Too embarrassed to answer my question? As a matter of fact I have an alcoholic in my family and I certainly wouldn't want him to have a gun. Right now, thanks to the attitudes of people like you, there is nothing at all to prevent his buying one quite legally. So, you support prior restraint and preventing a legal purchase by someone who is NOT barred - this is NOT a surprise to the rest of us, John. So you think drunks and nutters like Cho with guns are good public policy. Interesting.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #191 February 25, 2010 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote No, no... kallend doesn't want a BAN - he supports enforcing existing laws on guns (after they're changed how he wants them, anyway). Explain how tightening the rules on nutters having guns would effectively ban you or rushmc from having a gun. Is there something that you two haven't been telling us? Enquiring minds want to know. Explain how 'enforcing existing laws' includes changing them. Is there some nutter in your family or college that you don't want getting a gun? Enquiring minds want to know. Too embarrassed to answer my question? As a matter of fact I have an alcoholic in my family and I certainly wouldn't want him to have a gun. Right now, thanks to the attitudes of people like you, there is nothing at all to prevent his buying one quite legally. So, you support prior restraint and preventing a legal purchase by someone who is NOT barred - this is NOT a surprise to the rest of us, John. He is getting dangerously close to giving the specifics here that will make my case"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #192 February 25, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteNo, no... kallend doesn't want a BAN - he supports enforcing existing laws on guns (after they're changed how he wants them, anyway). Explain how tightening the rules on nutters having guns would effectively ban you or rushmc from having a gun. Is there something that you two haven't been telling us? Enquiring minds want to know. Explain how 'enforcing existing laws' includes changing them. Is there some nutter in your family or college that you don't want getting a gun? Enquiring minds want to know. Too embarrassed to answer my question? As a matter of fact I have an alcoholic in my family and I certainly wouldn't want him to have a gun. Right now, thanks to the attitudes of people like you, there is nothing at all to prevent his buying one quite legally. So, you support prior restraint and preventing a legal purchase by someone who is NOT barred - this is NOT a surprise to the rest of us, John. So you think drunks and nutters like Cho with guns are good public policy. Interesting. Yet ANOTHER lie.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #193 February 25, 2010 QuoteQuote So, you support prior restraint and preventing a legal purchase by someone who is NOT barred - this is NOT a surprise to the rest of us, John. So you think drunks and nutters like Cho with guns are good public policy. Interesting. The questions you don't want to address is your level of willingness to kill prior restraint or privacy rights in exchange for perceived safety gains. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,112 #194 February 25, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuote So, you support prior restraint and preventing a legal purchase by someone who is NOT barred - this is NOT a surprise to the rest of us, John. So you think drunks and nutters like Cho with guns are good public policy. Interesting. The questions you don't want to address is your level of willingness to kill prior restraint or privacy rights in exchange for perceived safety gains. We have prior restraint already, it's just ineffectively enforced. Privacy? What privacy is that? Haven't you heard of Homeland Security, NSA, etc? Privacy is SO 1970s.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,112 #195 February 25, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteNo, no... kallend doesn't want a BAN - he supports enforcing existing laws on guns (after they're changed how he wants them, anyway). Explain how tightening the rules on nutters having guns would effectively ban you or rushmc from having a gun. Is there something that you two haven't been telling us? Enquiring minds want to know. Explain how 'enforcing existing laws' includes changing them. Is there some nutter in your family or college that you don't want getting a gun? Enquiring minds want to know. Too embarrassed to answer my question? As a matter of fact I have an alcoholic in my family and I certainly wouldn't want him to have a gun. Right now, thanks to the attitudes of people like you, there is nothing at all to prevent his buying one quite legally. So, you support prior restraint and preventing a legal purchase by someone who is NOT barred - this is NOT a surprise to the rest of us, John. So you think drunks and nutters like Cho with guns are good public policy. Interesting. Yet ANOTHER lie. So you claim, but I have yet to see a post of yours that suggests any remedy, and lots of posts that oppose anyone else's suggestions.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #196 February 25, 2010 Quote So you claim, but I have yet to see a post of yours that suggests any remedy, and lots of posts that oppose anyone else's suggestions. No solution is preferable to crappy ones. But I'm sure he's frequently suggested CCW permits be valid on campus, so this would be a false statement on your part. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,112 #197 February 26, 2010 QuoteQuote So you claim, but I have yet to see a post of yours that suggests any remedy, and lots of posts that oppose anyone else's suggestions. No solution is preferable to crappy ones. But I'm sure he's frequently suggested CCW permits be valid on campus, so this would be a false statement on your part. INCORRECT - I suggest you re-read the last few posts.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #198 February 26, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuote So you claim, but I have yet to see a post of yours that suggests any remedy, and lots of posts that oppose anyone else's suggestions. No solution is preferable to crappy ones. But I'm sure he's frequently suggested CCW permits be valid on campus, so this would be a false statement on your part. INCORRECT - I suggest you re-read the last few posts. LIE. Find ONE post where I've said that CCW holders shouldn't be allowed to carry on-campus.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,112 #199 February 26, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote So you claim, but I have yet to see a post of yours that suggests any remedy, and lots of posts that oppose anyone else's suggestions. No solution is preferable to crappy ones. But I'm sure he's frequently suggested CCW permits be valid on campus, so this would be a false statement on your part. INCORRECT - I suggest you re-read the last few posts. LIE. Find ONE post where I've said that CCW holders shouldn't be allowed to carry on-campus. If you re-read the sequence of posts CAREFULLY you will see where you are mistaken.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #200 February 26, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote So you claim, but I have yet to see a post of yours that suggests any remedy, and lots of posts that oppose anyone else's suggestions. No solution is preferable to crappy ones. But I'm sure he's frequently suggested CCW permits be valid on campus, so this would be a false statement on your part. INCORRECT - I suggest you re-read the last few posts. LIE. Find ONE post where I've said that CCW holders shouldn't be allowed to carry on-campus. If you re-read the sequence of posts CAREFULLY you will see where you are mistaken. No, all I see is you lying about my supposed positions on gun control - so, why don't you go ahead and quote it out so we can all see what passes for logic in kallend-world?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
