0
BDashe

Mean Street

Recommended Posts

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

>I'm saying they are guilty, as usual, of using it to create scapegoats
>(the rich, the successful, and big business) to further their agenda.

Oh, agreed. So is the GOP. For them it's simple - it's Fannie Mae. It's Clinton's repeal of Glass-Steagal. It's the Community Reinvestment Act. It's Obama's socialist policies. It's poor liberals who want mortgages but are unwilling to pay for them. It's anyone but themselves, in other words.

As the article points out, such approaches do nothing to solve the problem.



If ever we needed a 3rd party the time is now.



While I agree, that would, (at this point) put another Obama style admin in control



Maybe...but the 2 party system is broken. It's like a couple of 4 year olds anymore.



Maybe but it does expose the drifting of the two parties from thier roots. I would advocate taking the parties back from the extreemists that have coopted them for thier own use




How has teh Dems been controlled by extremists? Hell, Clinton signed the homophobic 1996 Marriage Defense Act, the corporate-loving NAFTA tax cut/dereg for rich boys; what leftist extremism? Obama and most Dems were for the 700B gift to the banks so tehy could continue their millions dollar fuck-fests. If the Dems were so extreme left they could have found a way to pass the HC Bill which now looks doomed - you simply can't substantiate your silly claim that the left is extreme. Shit, Obama even decided to continue the RW Iraq/AFG Wars, where's the LW extremism? You're outta gas.



I am outa gas?

Spoken by a man wearing rose colored glasses

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zJq8SIIB9s
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

>I'm saying they are guilty, as usual, of using it to create scapegoats
>(the rich, the successful, and big business) to further their agenda.

Oh, agreed. So is the GOP. For them it's simple - it's Fannie Mae. It's Clinton's repeal of Glass-Steagal. It's the Community Reinvestment Act. It's Obama's socialist policies. It's poor liberals who want mortgages but are unwilling to pay for them. It's anyone but themselves, in other words.

As the article points out, such approaches do nothing to solve the problem.



If ever we needed a 3rd party the time is now.



While I agree, that would, (at this point) put another Obama style admin in control



Maybe...but the 2 party system is broken. It's like a couple of 4 year olds anymore.



Maybe but it does expose the drifting of the two parties from thier roots. I would advocate taking the parties back from the extreemists that have coopted them for thier own use




How has teh Dems been controlled by extremists? Hell, Clinton signed the homophobic 1996 Marriage Defense Act, the corporate-loving NAFTA tax cut/dereg for rich boys; what leftist extremism? Obama and most Dems were for the 700B gift to the banks so tehy could continue their millions dollar fuck-fests. If the Dems were so extreme left they could have found a way to pass the HC Bill which now looks doomed - you simply can't substantiate your silly claim that the left is extreme. Shit, Obama even decided to continue the RW Iraq/AFG Wars, where's the LW extremism? You're outta gas.



I am outa gas?

Spoken by a man wearing rose colored glasses

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zJq8SIIB9s




So you have no comment, just more rhetoric. Same/same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

>I'm saying they are guilty, as usual, of using it to create scapegoats
>(the rich, the successful, and big business) to further their agenda.

Oh, agreed. So is the GOP. For them it's simple - it's Fannie Mae. It's Clinton's repeal of Glass-Steagal. It's the Community Reinvestment Act. It's Obama's socialist policies. It's poor liberals who want mortgages but are unwilling to pay for them. It's anyone but themselves, in other words.

As the article points out, such approaches do nothing to solve the problem.



If ever we needed a 3rd party the time is now.



While I agree, that would, (at this point) put another Obama style admin in control



Maybe...but the 2 party system is broken. It's like a couple of 4 year olds anymore.



Maybe but it does expose the drifting of the two parties from thier roots. I would advocate taking the parties back from the extreemists that have coopted them for thier own use




How has teh Dems been controlled by extremists? Hell, Clinton signed the homophobic 1996 Marriage Defense Act, the corporate-loving NAFTA tax cut/dereg for rich boys; what leftist extremism? Obama and most Dems were for the 700B gift to the banks so tehy could continue their millions dollar fuck-fests. If the Dems were so extreme left they could have found a way to pass the HC Bill which now looks doomed - you simply can't substantiate your silly claim that the left is extreme. Shit, Obama even decided to continue the RW Iraq/AFG Wars, where's the LW extremism? You're outta gas.



I am outa gas?

Spoken by a man wearing rose colored glasses

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zJq8SIIB9s




So you have no comment, just more rhetoric. Same/same.



No sir, your sense of reality is so distorted I can only pray for you
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

>I'm saying they are guilty, as usual, of using it to create scapegoats
>(the rich, the successful, and big business) to further their agenda.

Oh, agreed. So is the GOP. For them it's simple - it's Fannie Mae. It's Clinton's repeal of Glass-Steagal. It's the Community Reinvestment Act. It's Obama's socialist policies. It's poor liberals who want mortgages but are unwilling to pay for them. It's anyone but themselves, in other words.

As the article points out, such approaches do nothing to solve the problem.



If ever we needed a 3rd party the time is now.



While I agree, that would, (at this point) put another Obama style admin in control



Maybe...but the 2 party system is broken. It's like a couple of 4 year olds anymore.



Maybe but it does expose the drifting of the two parties from thier roots. I would advocate taking the parties back from the extreemists that have coopted them for thier own use




How has teh Dems been controlled by extremists? Hell, Clinton signed the homophobic 1996 Marriage Defense Act, the corporate-loving NAFTA tax cut/dereg for rich boys; what leftist extremism? Obama and most Dems were for the 700B gift to the banks so tehy could continue their millions dollar fuck-fests. If the Dems were so extreme left they could have found a way to pass the HC Bill which now looks doomed - you simply can't substantiate your silly claim that the left is extreme. Shit, Obama even decided to continue the RW Iraq/AFG Wars, where's the LW extremism? You're outta gas.



I am outa gas?

Spoken by a man wearing rose colored glasses

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zJq8SIIB9s




So you have no comment, just more rhetoric. Same/same.



No sir, your sense of reality is so distorted I can only pray for you



And yet you cannot idnetify Democratic extremism, but you'll hold your opinion.

How has teh Dems been controlled by extremists? Hell, Clinton signed the homophobic 1996 Marriage Defense Act, the corporate-loving NAFTA tax cut/dereg for rich boys; what leftist extremism? Obama and most Dems were for the 700B gift to the banks so tehy could continue their millions dollar fuck-fests. If the Dems were so extreme left they could have found a way to pass the HC Bill which now looks doomed - you simply can't substantiate your silly claim that the left is extreme. Shit, Obama even decided to continue the RW Iraq/AFG Wars, where's the LW extremism? You're outta gas.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Again my friend

It is your rose colored glasses

If you cannot see any extremism on the Dem side they (your glasses)are more colored than most

It exists to varying extents on both sides. (as I originally posted) You just chose not to see it, for what ever reason
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0