Recommended Posts
RonD1120 62
QuoteQuote
If the flood gates open it will not be good news. Prepare to see what I have seen.
the flood gates have never been shut thats the point
Well, that is correct. As the old joke goes, if you want to smuggle a WMD into the USA, just hide it in a bale of marijuana.
Kennedy 0
Guard your honor, let your reputation fall where it will, and outlast the bastards.
1*
Quote
I have been involved in world of substance use disorder all my adult life. I do not see where government funding has stemmed the tide of abuse and addiction. On the other side, I have seen the predictable tragedy of untimely death through suicide and murder, devastated lives in poverty and sickness, as a direct result using mood altering chemicals.
If the flood gates open it will not be good news. Prepare to see what I have seen.
What do you think would happen if ten percent of the money currently spent on enforcement was spent on rehab?
RonD1120 62
Quote
What do you think would happen if ten percent of the money currently spent on enforcement was spent on rehab?
I think the existing rehab facilities would try to expand in competition with new programs as the realization of new funding became known.
The grab for the new funds would require more effective lobbying and executive level management connections. Thus the administrative cost of executive salaries would increase in greater proportion to program or facility expansion.
The increased competition would require more justification by staff certifications and licencing. Competitive regulation also requires more objective verifiable evidence in the form treatment plans, charting and auditing.
The burnout rate on qualified professionals increases in direct proportion to the level of paperwork required. In the midst of staff turnover, the stress levels increase due to increased case load along with concomitant paper work. The rule of the 3 P's, Paperwork has Priority over People.
The clients soon realize that it is strictly a bureaucratic business with very little individual attention given to them. The success rate will continue to be modified within the field requiring less clean time to be considered successful treatment. Success rate is determined by outcomes measurement.
The last program where I worked required that the convicted felon ordered into rehab would be considered successful if not arrested for the same offense for one year. In other words, if a client was arrested for possession of cocaine and completed court ordered rehab his arrest record would be tracked for one year. If within that one year period he was arrested again for possession of methamphetamine, it did not count against the program.
As substance use disorder is statistically determined to be increasing, the program/facility lobbyists will petition for more funding to combat the problem. As programs secure more funding the executive salaries will be rewarded first and then..., well, you get the idea.
ryoder 1,590
Quote
If the flood gates open it will not be good news. Prepare to see what I have seen.
Yes, it certainly was a disaster in Portugal, wasn't it?

http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1893946,00.html
rehmwa 2
QuoteQuote
What do you think would happen if ten percent of the money currently spent on enforcement was spent on rehab?
I think the existing rehab facilities would try to expand in competition with .......(a whole lot of stuff).
nonsense, why spend 10% at all when it'll all be FREE from the gub'ment using "Obama money"
...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants
Fewer people are smoking now, and a lot of that is directly related to education. People are figuring out that smoking is, well...really bad for you. Fewer people are starting to smoke, and more smokers are quitting.
There's enough hard data about why most drugs are really bad for you to convince most people to never try them.
Also, drugs currently fund most gang crime... I wonder what would happen to the gangs and the crime if the black market drug money went away because people could buy them legally?
RonD1120 62
QuoteBut what if 10% of the money currently spent on prohibition was instead spent on education? Or even 50%?
Fewer people are smoking now, and a lot of that is directly related to education. People are figuring out that smoking is, well...really bad for you. Fewer people are starting to smoke, and more smokers are quitting.
There's enough hard data about why most drugs are really bad for you to convince most people to never try them.
Also, drugs currently fund most gang crime... I wonder what would happen to the gangs and the crime if the black market drug money went away because people could buy them legally?
When I first became involved with drug programs, 1973, education was the approach. My program, Thee Door, was the 2nd licensed in FL. It was based on the Free Clinic model from Woodstock and San Francisco. That is, freaks helping freaks.
We realized that our society did drugs, either legal or illegal. Our Methadone program was about 50% Vietnam vets. My public speaking engagements opened with, "I am not here to tell you not to do drugs. I am here to tell you about the drugs you are doing."
In the end we had a considerable number of highly educated addicts and recreational drug users.
The reason people engage in the use of mood altering chemicals is they work, for awhile. By the time you realize they are not working any longer you are way behind the learning curve. Acquisition and maintenance of supply becomes the primary psychological function.
There is hard data to substantiate long term negative effects and affects from the use of marijuana and cocaine. How many skydivers ignore those warnings? Just take a quick glance back through the responses in this thread.
blue skies from thai sky adventures
good solid response-provoking keyboarding
the flood gates have never been shut thats the point
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites