skyrider 0 #1 January 13, 2010 How much do you coolaid drinkers need to see, before you catch on?... Queen Pelosi wasn't happy with the small USAF C-20B jet, Gulfstream III, that comes with the Speaker's job ... OH, NO. Queen Pelosi was aggravated that this little jet had to stop to refuel, so she ordered a Big Fat, 200-seat, USAF C-32, Boeing 757 jet that could get her arrogant zionist fat ass back to California without stopping. I understand that a former Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich, flew commercial most of the time. Much more, and pictures: http://www.rense.com/general89/pelos.htm Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IanHarrop 43 #2 January 13, 2010 Check what snopes has to say http://www.snopes.com/politics/pelosi/jet.asp or this http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/did_nancy_pelosi_order_up_a_200-seat.html"Where troubles melt like lemon drops, away above the chimney tops, that's where you'll find me" Dorothy Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #3 January 13, 2010 Quote . . . her arrogant zionist fat ass . . . Really? Is that where you wanted to go; straight to anti-semitism?quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skyrider 0 #4 January 13, 2010 Since she only works 3 days a week, this gas guzzling jet gets fueled and she flies home to California every Friday and returns every Monday, at a cost to the taxpayers (YOU and ME are those taxpayers!) of about $60,000, one way! As Joe put it ..."unfortunately, we have to pay to bring her back on Monday night and that costs us another $60,000" Taxpayers, that is $480,000 per month and that is an annual cost to us of $5,760,000. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #5 January 13, 2010 QuoteAs Joe put it ..."unfortunately, we have to pay to bring her back on Monday night and that costs us another $60,000" You keep copying and pasting stuff from the article you already linked. Do you personally have any original thoughts on the subject? BTW, who the fuck is "Joe"?quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BillyVance 35 #6 January 13, 2010 QuoteQuoteAs Joe put it ..."unfortunately, we have to pay to bring her back on Monday night and that costs us another $60,000" You keep copying and pasting stuff from the article you already linked. Do you personally have any original thoughts on the subject? BTW, who the fuck is "Joe"? Joe the plumber is my best guess, without looking at the article."Mediocre people don't like high achievers, and high achievers don't like mediocre people." - SIX TIME National Champion coach Nick Saban Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skyrider 0 #7 January 13, 2010 QuoteCheck what snopes has to say http://www.snopes.com/politics/pelosi/jet.asp or this http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/did_nancy_pelosi_order_up_a_200-seat.html Thanks still comes down to rediculous government waste! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IanHarrop 43 #8 January 13, 2010 QuoteQuoteCheck what snopes has to say http://www.snopes.com/politics/pelosi/jet.asp or this http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/did_nancy_pelosi_order_up_a_200-seat.html Thanks still comes down to rediculous government waste! Another articlehttp://factcheck.org/2009/03/plane-false/ Final paragraph ... seems she uses aircraft less than the Speaker she replaced --- For further discussion of the discrepancy between Judicial Watch’s implications and the actual documents the group provides, see this March 11 report from ABC News. The ABC reporters also compared air travel requests by Pelosi with those of Hastert and found that "Pelosi made the equivalent of 20 round-trips between Washington (Andrews Air Force Base) and San Francisco. That’s an average of less than one round-trip per month. In contrast, former Speaker Hastert traveled home to his Illinois district virtually every weekend and, his former aides tell ABC News, he would almost always travel on military aircraft." ---"Where troubles melt like lemon drops, away above the chimney tops, that's where you'll find me" Dorothy Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanuckInUSA 0 #9 January 13, 2010 QuoteBTW, who the fuck is "Joe"? My guess is Joe Biden? I could be wrong. Why are you ... a moderator using profane language here? Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #10 January 13, 2010 QuoteWhy are you ... a moderator using profane language here? I'm moderately fond of "profane" language. I wield it like a sword for emphasis. I think if you read the rules of this web site you'll notice "profane" language isn't outside the rules. We're all (technically) adults. If you are the type of person that can't deal with an occasional profanity, then I think you might be in the wrong sport and on the wrong web site. BTW: QuoteTry not to worry about the things you have no control over "Less bitching, more jumping" Pretty fuckin' ironic.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanuckInUSA 0 #11 January 13, 2010 QuoteI think if you read the rules of this web site you'll notice "profane" language isn't outside the rules. We're all (technically) adults. If you are the type of person that can't deal with an occasional profanity, then I think you might be in the wrong sport and on the wrong web site. Well since we are now allowed to swear, what the FUCK does myself being involved with skydiving have to do with this FUCKING thread? You can't be serious when you say I am in the wrong sport. Nancy Pelosi is grossly wasting tax payers money (she is not the first nor is she the last politician to do this). In a time of global economic troubles, Queen Pelosi (one of the most powerful people) refuses to lead by example. You need to put aside your partisan politics for once and recognize this. I do not always agree with what Bill Von has to say on every subject, but I respect the man because he is capable of of acting in a bipartisan manner. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DrewEckhardt 0 #12 January 13, 2010 QuoteSince she only works 3 days a week, this gas guzzling jet gets fueled and she flies home to California every Friday and returns every Monday, at a cost to the taxpayers (YOU and ME are those taxpayers!) of about $60,000, one way! As Joe put it ..."unfortunately, we have to pay to bring her back on Monday night and that costs us another $60,000" Taxpayers, that is $480,000 per month and that is an annual cost to us of $5,760,000. At .0009% of the $660,000,000,000 US military budget such trivial sums are completely irrelevant. If you want to bitch about over-spending, bitch about the biggest socialist over-spending problem in the budget. Canada has the same land mass but more shoreline and does fine on 1/30th of that with $18.2B in 2008 and an expected $19B tab in 2009. Fixes here would net $500,000,000,000 savings not $6,000,000. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #13 January 13, 2010 QuoteWell since we are now allowed to swear, what the FUCK does myself being involved with skydiving have to do with this FUCKING thread? You can't be serious when you say I am in the wrong sport. Congratulations! I hope you feel liberated and that the weight of oppression has been lifted from your shoulders. Now to work on reading and comprehension. Quote Nancy Pelosi is grossly wasting tax payers money (she is not the first nor is she the last politician to do this). In a time of global economic troubles, Queen Pelosi (one of the most powerful people) refuses to lead by example. You need to put aside your partisan politics for once and recognize this. My comment have zero to do with partisan politics. This entire topic has to do with her being the Speaker of the House and representing a state that is farther away from Washington DC than the range of the previous jet could guarantee. Quote I do not always agree with what Bill Von has to say on every subject, but I respect the man because he is capable of of acting in a bipartisan manner. A mirror is a wonderful thing. You should look into it.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanuckInUSA 0 #14 January 13, 2010 QuoteCanada has the same land mass but more shoreline and does fine on 1/30th of that with $18.2B in 2008 Hmmm ... you should NOT bring Canada into this Drew. As long as Canada is allies with the USA, Canada does not need to spend money on it's defense like other countries need to spend. The US has proven time again that they are 2nd to none when it comes to invading counties. They just really suck at occupying them. But if the USA ever wanted to feel good about it's ability to occupy a country they could do it in Canada. Liberal Canada has disarmed itself and the people who do have weapons tend to like America. But if the USA did not have it's military, Russia, China ... heck Somalia could invade and occupy Canada. But did I miss the memo? The title of this thread was about Nancy Pelosi wasting tax payers money using a 200 person Jet to charter herself back and forth across the country. I didn't know this thread was instead about the military complex. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanuckInUSA 0 #15 January 13, 2010 QuoteThis entire topic has to do with her being the Speaker of the House and representing a state that is farther away from Washington DC than the range of the previous jet could guarantee. Interesting ... in 1927 Charles Lindbergh was able to fly non-stop from New York to Paris in a small aircraft, but in 2010 Nancy Pelosi needs a 200 seat aircraft to travel a similar distance? Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #16 January 13, 2010 Holy shit, people, the story isn't true. Read the links. There are plenty of legitimate things about Pelosi you can bitch about. Going on and on about a false story just makes you look silly. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #17 January 13, 2010 QuoteInteresting ... in 1927 Charles Lindbergh was able to fly non-stop from New York to Paris in a small aircraft, but in 2010 Nancy Pelosi needs a 200 seat aircraft to travel a similar distance? Your understanding of modern aviation and the security requirements of the person 3rd in line of succession to the President is truly amazing.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #18 January 13, 2010 Quote such trivial sums ($5,760,000) are completely irrelevant. nice gambit, but so completely overused and wrong same people using that argument also complain about $2M bonus going to CEOs on banks and car companies - consider Pelosi as another executive and you can see the hypocrisy in playing that card ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanuckInUSA 0 #19 January 13, 2010 Quote Your understanding of modern aviation and the security requirements of the person 3rd in line of succession to the President is truly amazing. Want to talk about being terrorized ... the thought that Nancy Pelosi could possibly be the Grand Poobah of the USA would bring terror down my spine. I sure as heck don't want to see Sarah Palin be prez (IMHO she is not the right person) ... but Nancy Pelosi be the head honcho? Good grief ... scary ... Canadian politics is a joke (if America ever cared about what happened in the rest of the world you would know what I mean). But the only thing worse than Canadian politics, is US politics. Try not to worry about the things you have no control over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #20 January 13, 2010 QuoteHoly shit, people, the story isn't true. Read the links. that's the real point - it doesn't matter if it's true or not - the partisanship knee jerk reaction is for people to automatically support this with whatever hairbrained excuse they can come up with ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #21 January 13, 2010 I agree, but there is also the partisan kneejerk reaction of getting all indignant about it. Can't we all just get along? And maybe focus our attention on the real problems we have, instend of the make-believe ones? - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #22 January 13, 2010 Quote I agree, but there is also the partisan kneejerk reaction of getting all indignant about it. What? How dare you sir!!! Can't we all just get along? apparently not And maybe focus our attention on the real problems we have, instend of the make-believe ones?but the make-believe ones are so much easier to argue what I think is really fun, is there could be a thread on the exact same issue posted next week, except instead of Pelosi, it'll be some Republican senator - and most of the posts will be exactly the same, only the players reversed. Maybe with more Lucky sprayed in. Maybe 3 or 4 here that just think it's nuts both ways. In the meantime - if $5M is a nit, then I'd like to have it. I think I can make better use of it. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #23 January 13, 2010 C'mon, man, let's hug it out. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #24 January 13, 2010 Only if you take off that camera, it's a bit intimidating. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,644 #25 January 13, 2010 The real upshot (from where I look, which is all that matters to me) - Nancy Pelosi is something of a bitch. But hardworking & disciplined as well. Kind of like Condoleeza Rice. - George W. Bush decreed that SOH should be afforded protected government transportation after 9/11. - Nancy Pelosi is pretty rabidly partisan, but she doesn't lie about her positions or try to pretty them up. If she were a man that folks agreed with, she'd be a "straight shooter who's not afraid to say it like it is." - The reason she "needed" a bigger jet is that the Seargeant at Arms (first chosen by the Republican congress in 2005 and kept since then) said that she should be able to fly non-stop as part of security. San Francisco is a little farther away than Illinois (where previous SOH Hastert came from). But nobody really cares. Because it's much easier just to turn her into a figurehead for female evil to the right, now that Hillary isn't quite as easily visible. Sarah Palin serves that purpose to the left; Phyllis Schlafly is so 1970's. Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites