Recommended Posts
rushmc 23
Quote>Ah, this IS the PC crowd in the US today.
Perhaps. I'll let you argue with RonD about that; he seems to feel it is a way to _fight_ political correctness.
Fight it? Not sure of your twist here.
But one way to deal with it is to constantly expose it for the pure shit it is and then not let the PC police intimidate you into silence

if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
Quote
For the most part we live with laws that came from or agree to Christian values. Generally, not specifically.
This seems to be incorrect. Christian values agreed with already existing laws, not vice versa. Also could you please name a couple of laws we live with which _came_ from Christian values (and which are not plain silly)?
Quote
We have been for many years moving away from being responsible for ourselves and our own actions. This, again, IMO, moves us away from Christian values.
Being responsible for yourself and your action has nothing to do with Christian values.
RonD1120 62
QuoteSo you're saying that you'd prefer the US to be a Christian theocracy? Obviously not everyone would have to be a Christian, they'd just have to adhere to whichever laws in the Bible were enforced by the sect in charge. Because a government can enforce behavior, not belief. Look at how well enforcing belief has worked for totalitarian governments.
Some sects won't allow women leading men. Some sects are OK with that. Some sects enforce some of the Leviticus laws; others say that they are of the Old Testament. Some sects celebrate Sunday as the sabbath, others Saturday.
Since these kinds of rules would have a huge impact on how people lived, there'd have to be a specific set chosen; ergo, a sect-in-charge. Is there a single right one?
Wendy P.
You are sliding into a theological discussion. My post concerned political correctness and its detrimental effect in the military command structure at Ft Hood.
In the treatment of substance use disorder, as with other mental health issues, gut level, rigorous honesty is encouraged to the near mandatory level. People adjust more efficiently when confronted honestly.
The wussification of America is the subversive movement based on the notion that no one's feelings should be hurt. Thus, we have political correctness.
Actually, I would prefer a Christian theocratic government but, that will not happen until Jesus Christ of Nazareth returns and establishes His government. Probably won't happen in our lifetime.
RonD1120 62
QuoteQuoteProgressive liberals and their socialistic agenda is movement for power and control by elitists.
Pssst... hate to break it to you, but you've just defined fascism.
Exactly! Thank you for your supportive agreement.
wolfriverjoe 1,523
RonD1120Reports are indicating that political correctness was a prime factor in the Ft Hood murders.
QuoteIn Hasan Case, Superiors Ignored Their Worries
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,582732,00.html
Something interesting in this case came out yesterday.
It seems that Hassan was a Koran "Literalist". He believed that his mother, who died in 2001 was burning in hell for selling alcohol.
Somehow, he transformed that belief into the idea that killing the US soldiers at Ft Hood would atone for her sins and allow her into "paradise".
The correspondence with the radical Iman had far less to do with it than originally thought.
Link: https://abcnews.go.com/US/us-army-officer-turned-terrorist-thought-attack-save/story?id=58585738
So, rather than 'political correctness', it was 'religious idiocy' and literal belief of the 'sacred texts'.
Several threads popped up in search. This one seemed appropriate. Link in OP is long dead.
"~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo
RonD1120 62
wolfriverjoe***Reports are indicating that political correctness was a prime factor in the Ft Hood murders.
QuoteIn Hasan Case, Superiors Ignored Their Worries
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,582732,00.html
Something interesting in this case came out yesterday.
It seems that Hassan was a Koran "Literalist". He believed that his mother, who died in 2001 was burning in hell for selling alcohol.
Somehow, he transformed that belief into the idea that killing the US soldiers at Ft Hood would atone for her sins and allow her into "paradise".
The correspondence with the radical Iman had far less to do with it than originally thought.
Link: https://abcnews.go.com/US/us-army-officer-turned-terrorist-thought-attack-save/story?id=58585738
So, rather than 'political correctness', it was 'religious idiocy' and literal belief of the 'sacred texts'.
Several threads popped up in search. This one seemed appropriate. Link in OP is long dead.
I agree this is an interesting view.
IIRC the PC aspect had to do with his ARMY superiors overlooking his Islamic behavior within its ranks.
Bottom line, a religious nut is a religious nut and they come in all flavors. In America, we understand Christian nuts much better than Islamic nuts.
Or, at least I do.
Perhaps. I'll let you argue with RonD about that; he seems to feel it is a way to _fight_ political correctness.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites