kallend 2,230 #51 December 23, 2009 QuoteKallen are you an I agreeing on Tort Reform? Dunno, what is your position on tort reform? I'm in favor of (1) making the loser pay the winner's costs. That should reduce the number of nuisance and frivolous lawsuits. (2) eliminating the doctrine that even if 1% liable for an injury you can be 100% responsible for the damage award if you are a rich bastard, and (3) having impartial court appointed expert witnesses rather than hired guns.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #52 December 23, 2009 Quote I'm in favor of (1) making the loser pay the winner's costs. That should reduce the number of nuisance and frivolous lawsuits. And eliminate the ability of the commoners to use the courts to seek justice. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
likearock 2 #53 December 23, 2009 QuoteQuote I'm in favor of (1) making the loser pay the winner's costs. That should reduce the number of nuisance and frivolous lawsuits. And eliminate the ability of the commoners to use the courts to seek justice. Gotta agree here. There's no way John Q Citizen would ever go against a big corporation even if they had a solid case. The downside of paying off multi-million dollar lawyer fees would be too much. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
