Latest on GOP family values

[Royd 0]

Quote

No one here is saying that people should not aim high. They are saying you should not tell OTHERS to aim high while you're having sex with the prostitute.

Maybe he's into stimulating the economy, instead of just have sex with an ordinary, everyday slut.

[kallend 2,112]

Quote

Quote

No one here is saying that people should not aim high. They are saying you should not tell OTHERS to aim high while you're having sex with the prostitute.

Maybe he's into stimulating the economy, instead of just have sex with an ordinary, everyday slut.

"Economy", is that your cute word for the body part he stimulated?

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[Amazon 7]

Quote

U.S Rep Mark Foley- Was soliciting sex from teenage congressional page boys for more than 10 years. When outed he resigned his seat while being chastised by the republican party and when he left, his party said it was the right thing to do.

What I stated above fits the rePUBIClowns to a tee. If you are going to legislate morality I guesss you seem to think you need to research it by indulging in it yourself????

Uh you do realize he was going after kids.... yet he sponsored bills that look what... like legislating the morally reprehensible acts he was indulging in....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Foley

Quote

In the House, Foley was one of the foremost opponents of child pornography. Foley had served as chairman of the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children. He introduced a bill, coined the "Child Modeling Exploitation prevention Act of 2002" to outlaw web sites featuring sexually suggestive images of preteen children, saying that “these websites are nothing more than a fix for pedophiles.” As it was written, the bill would have prohibited commercial photography of children, and it failed due to the unmanageable burden it would have presented to the legitimate entertainment industry.[13][14] In June 2003 he wrote letters to the governor and attorney general of Florida, asking them to review the legality of a program for teenagers of a Lake Como nudist resort in Land o’ Lakes, Florida.[15]

Foley's legislation to change federal sex offender laws was supported by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, America's Most Wanted host John Walsh, and a number of victims' rights groups. President Bush signed it into law as part of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006

And the beat goes on and on.. Its not spewing hate.. its fucking pointing out the obvious... unless you are so blinded in your hatred for anyone to the feft of Atilla the hun,,, the I guess you really do believe the propaganda for all these years.

[mnealtx 0]

I'm sorry - how many 17 year old pages did Foley screw, again? He only had to get to *two* to beat Gerry Studds.

Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

[Amazon 7]

Quote

I'm sorry - how many 17 year old pages did Foley screw, again? He only had to get to *two* to beat Gerry Studds.

And which family values bills did Studds sponsor??

The rePUBIClowns rode to power on family values based on Studds and others.. 20 to 30 years ago... yet your boys are current "affairs"

[kallend 2,112]

Quote

Quote

I'm sorry - how many 17 year old pages did Foley screw, again? He only had to get to *two* to beat Gerry Studds.

And which family values bills did Studds sponsor??

The rePUBIClowns rode to power on family values based on Studds and others.. 20 to 30 years ago... yet your boys are current "affairs"

You need to remember that Mike doesn't have a dictionary and doesn't understand the concept of hypocrisy.

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[mnealtx 0]

Quote

You need to remember that Mike doesn't have a dictionary and doesn't understand the concept of hypocrisy.

Sure I do - it's the "Kallend edition" - one page that says "You're always right".

Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

[jgoose71 0]

I think the point went right over your head. I don't agree with what he did, and neither did the republican party, as oppose to the democratic party, who would circle their wagons around such actions.

Nobody thinks what he did was right and most still believe in family values.

When is the democratic party going to take similar actions against Kevin Jennings? Or is it OK for democrats to be pedophiles because they don't campaign against it?

"There is an art, it says, or, rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss."
Life, the Universe, and Everything

[Amazon 7]

Quote

I think the point went right over your head. I don't agree with what he did, and neither did the republican party, as oppose to the democratic party, who would circle their wagons around such actions.

Nobody thinks what he did was right and most still believe in family values.

When is the democratic party going to take similar actions against Kevin Jennings? Or is it OK for democrats to be pedophiles because they don't campaign against it?

Wow.. its amazing you guys actually believe the stuff you spout

Shame on you and those who think this stuff up...but what the hell a good smear is the norm with people like Rove and Cheney and their fellow travellers.



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/terry-krepel/accuracy-in-medias-smear_b_392303.html

While CBSNews.com has 108 stories on the Salahis, the site only features one story on the "Safe Schools Czar" of the Obama administration, Kevin Jennings. The article on Jennings, entitled "Kevin Jennings Gets Boost from White House," was written on October 1, 2009. The article defends Jennings, who was selected for the position largely because of his work founding and directing the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), a radical gay promotion group.

However, since October 2009, a lot has happened with President Obama's favorite pedophile. Videos have surfaced of Jennings teaching 14-year-old boys the dangerous sexual practice of "fisting," and discussing with them the particulars of oral sex.


The second paragraph is entirely false. The controversial session to which Duzett is referring -- one of "over 50 sessions" at the 2000 conference sponsored by GLSEN, according to Jennings, founder of the group and its executive director at the time -- was run "by two [Massachusetts] Department of Education AIDS-HIV education specialists and a consultant to the department," as reported in a May 18, 2000, Boston Herald article highlighted by Media Matters. The Herald article went on to state that GLSEN "agreed yesterday that three workshop leaders crossed a line with raunchy content directed at students as young as 14 years old" and quoted Jennings as saying, "We need to make our expectations and guidelines to outside facilitators much more clear because we are surprised and troubled by some of the accounts we've heard."

Those false claims, it seems, was the basis of Duzett's claim that Jennings is a "pedophile." In fact, no allegations of pedophilia have been made against Jennings.

Shortly after Media Matters posted an item discrediting Duzett's claims (disclosure: I wrote that item for Media Matters), AIM removed Duzett's post from its website. (A screenshot of the full post is available at ConWebBlog.)

Given not only the false claims but the potentially libelous nature of Duzett's "pedophile" allegation, it seemed that more than a mere deletion was in order. AIM followed up the next day with a blog post that appropriately began with an apology:

Accuracy in Media regrets the publication of a blog entry accusing Department of Education official Kevin Jennings, a homosexual activist, of being a pedophile and personally teaching perverted sexual practices to young people. We have no evidence to support those specific charges. The blog entry was posted by an intern without permission, and has been taken down.

[kelpdiver 2]

Quote

Quote

You need to remember that Mike doesn't have a dictionary and doesn't understand the concept of hypocrisy.

Sure I do - it's the "Kallend edition" - one page that says "You're always right".

I'm quite sure that it actually says "I'm always right."

[jgoose71 0]

Quote

Quote

I think the point went right over your head. I don't agree with what he did, and neither did the republican party, as oppose to the democratic party, who would circle their wagons around such actions.

Nobody thinks what he did was right and most still believe in family values.

When is the democratic party going to take similar actions against Kevin Jennings? Or is it OK for democrats to be pedophiles because they don't campaign against it?

Wow.. its amazing you guys actually believe the stuff you spout

Shame on you and those who think this stuff up...but what the hell a good smear is the norm with people like Rove and Cheney and their fellow travellers.



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/terry-krepel/accuracy-in-medias-smear_b_392303.html

While CBSNews.com has 108 stories on the Salahis, the site only features one story on the "Safe Schools Czar" of the Obama administration, Kevin Jennings. The article on Jennings, entitled "Kevin Jennings Gets Boost from White House," was written on October 1, 2009. The article defends Jennings, who was selected for the position largely because of his work founding and directing the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), a radical gay promotion group.

However, since October 2009, a lot has happened with President Obama's favorite pedophile. Videos have surfaced of Jennings teaching 14-year-old boys the dangerous sexual practice of "fisting," and discussing with them the particulars of oral sex.


The second paragraph is entirely false. The controversial session to which Duzett is referring -- one of "over 50 sessions" at the 2000 conference sponsored by GLSEN, according to Jennings, founder of the group and its executive director at the time -- was run "by two [Massachusetts] Department of Education AIDS-HIV education specialists and a consultant to the department," as reported in a May 18, 2000, Boston Herald article highlighted by Media Matters. The Herald article went on to state that GLSEN "agreed yesterday that three workshop leaders crossed a line with raunchy content directed at students as young as 14 years old" and quoted Jennings as saying, "We need to make our expectations and guidelines to outside facilitators much more clear because we are surprised and troubled by some of the accounts we've heard."

Those false claims, it seems, was the basis of Duzett's claim that Jennings is a "pedophile." In fact, no allegations of pedophilia have been made against Jennings.

Shortly after Media Matters posted an item discrediting Duzett's claims (disclosure: I wrote that item for Media Matters), AIM removed Duzett's post from its website. (A screenshot of the full post is available at ConWebBlog.)

Given not only the false claims but the potentially libelous nature of Duzett's "pedophile" allegation, it seemed that more than a mere deletion was in order. AIM followed up the next day with a blog post that appropriately began with an apology:

Accuracy in Media regrets the publication of a blog entry accusing Department of Education official Kevin Jennings, a homosexual activist, of being a pedophile and personally teaching perverted sexual practices to young people. We have no evidence to support those specific charges. The blog entry was posted by an intern without permission, and has been taken down.

And my point was just made. He supported a relationship between an older man and a 15 to 16 year old boy, supports Harry Hay, and the article doesn't even come close to mentioning all the stuff he has tried to force on children, and you are backing him. I would never support anyone with a history like this.

Am I perfect? No. Do I say "I will never be perfect so why bother trying?" Hell no.

"There is an art, it says, or, rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss."
Life, the Universe, and Everything

[Amazon 7]

Did you even READ the fucking article.

Your ASSertions are based on lies from a right wing blog and they retracted it and you go merrily marching on with the same crap.

BUTT.. here ya go.. all of your guys who were aiming high??????????????

You do realize how many have fallen a little short right??


http://www.armchairsubversive.org/

[mnealtx 0]

Quote

Quote

Quote

You need to remember that Mike doesn't have a dictionary and doesn't understand the concept of hypocrisy.

Sure I do - it's the "Kallend edition" - one page that says "You're always right".

I'm quite sure that it actually says "I'm always right."

No, that's what Kallend says - I'm pretty sure a dictionary wouldn't need to affirm it's own accuracy.

Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706