This is why you don't believe right wing rag publications.

[rhys 0]

Quote

Are you an engineer? I am. I looked at the "proof" right up until it got so stupid that I stopped. I understand WHAT they are saying. I just think they are wrong, and complete idiots for thinking with so many digging that the cover up would have held for eight years with none of the participants ratting.

So you refute the findings of nano thermite in the dust in manhattan on 9/11?

did you look for it? did nist look for it? On what grounds would you call the steven jones and richard gage idiots?

they have evidence that you don't have, the nist did not look for, and you can simply brush them off as idiots?

The faimilies of the deceased would like to have some of the dust from 9/11/ beacyse they don't have any remains of thier family memebrs thet perished that day, it sits in a dump and they can't have some?

why?

what is so secrt about the dust?

don't worry these people (richard gage and srephen jones) are more than capable of continuling and bringing out the truth.

They are having expenential progress and their following is gaining the same sort of following.

Richard will leave New Zeland shortly to visit Japan, after his japan visit, i will be surprised if you don't see this in the worlds headlines, once out of rupert murdochs empire, you cannot stop a news worth story from spreading, it sells advertising you know.

pleny of electronics and new cars to sell in japan, they want those ratings.

you assume we think GWB planned it himself and that the left think that GWB was reponsable for everything his administration carried out.

a stupid assumtion.

GWB is an idiot, and if you refue that, then you as also one.

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

[mnealtx 0]

Quote

Quote

Are you an engineer? I am. I looked at the "proof" right up until it got so stupid that I stopped. I understand WHAT they are saying. I just think they are wrong, and complete idiots for thinking with so many digging that the cover up would have held for eight years with none of the participants ratting.

So you refute the findings of nano thermite in the dust in manhattan on 9/11?

Abso-fucking-lutely.

When are you going to answer the explosives questions, rhys?

BTW - you *are* aware that thermite is NOT an explosive, right?

Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

[Amazon 7]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Are you an engineer? I am. I looked at the "proof" right up until it got so stupid that I stopped. I understand WHAT they are saying. I just think they are wrong, and complete idiots for thinking with so many digging that the cover up would have held for eight years with none of the participants ratting.

So you refute the findings of nano thermite in the dust in manhattan on 9/11?

Abso-fucking-lutely.

When are you going to answer the explosives questions, rhys?

BTW - you *are* aware that thermite is NOT an explosive, right?

Why the fuck can't I get the Twilight Zone themesong out of my head everytime I see a post by one of these so called "truthers"

[d16842 0]

Quote

Quote

Are you an engineer? I am. I looked at the "proof" right up until it got so stupid that I stopped. I understand WHAT they are saying. I just think they are wrong, and complete idiots for thinking with so many digging that the cover up would have held for eight years with none of the participants ratting.

So you refute the findings of nano thermite in the dust in manhattan on 9/11?

did you look for it? did nist look for it? On what grounds would you call the steven jones and richard gage idiots?

You can read right? Because the grounds were explicitly stated in the section of my post you included above. Your question was answered before you asked it. Did I ask you if you could read?

But to repeat it just for you, the numbers of people who would have had to have been in the loop to pull the events of 9/11 are imense, and knowing our government as I do, especially the Bush administration, somebody would have told all and named names by now. It just couldn't be hidden this long.

Care to explain how Bush arranged for the terrorists to come here, take flight training, board the flights, take them over, and fly into the building on the right day, and hit the correct floors? All without being noticed in the long series of events, with all participants silent the whole time and especially since. And since you are sure the cabin doors didn't open, they must have talked American pilots into hitting the Pentagon. I don't claim to be the brighest candle on the planet, but the chances of that are about zero.

Which is more likely? All of the above happening, or somebody spiking the sample, or just contamination from something else, assuming it really exists that is.

Occam's razor, again.

Or you could just read this. Boiler Down!

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/06/070612152114.htm

Tom B

[rhys 0]

Quote

So you refute the findings of nano thermite in the dust in manhattan on 9/11?

Abso-fucking-lutely.

based on what information?

Quote

When are you going to answer the explosives questions, rhys?

I'll answer whatever you ask to the best of my knowledge or effort, do refresh my memory mike, without clouding it with other information designed to distact from the subject. what questions?

Quote

BTW - you *are* aware that thermite is NOT an explosive, right?

?

I'm not going to get hung up on semantics but I do believe you are ill informed;

Quote

ex·plo·sion (k-splzhn)
n.
1.
a. A release of mechanical, chemical, or nuclear energy in a sudden and often violent manner with the generation of high temperature and usually with the release of gases.

Source

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

[mnealtx 0]

Quote

Quote

So you refute the findings of nano thermite in the dust in manhattan on 9/11?

Abso-fucking-lutely.

based on what information?

Based on the fact that the presence of iron rust and aluminum doesn't mean that it's 'nano-thermite'.

Quote

Quote

When are you going to answer the explosives questions, rhys?

I'll answer whatever you ask to the best of my knowledge or effort, do refresh my memory mike, without clouding it with other information designed to distact from the subject. what questions?

I've posted them several times, but for some reason you never seem to see them - why is that, rhys?

Quote

Quote

BTW - you *are* aware that thermite is NOT an explosive, right?

?

I'm not going to get hung up on semantics but I do believe you are ill informed;

Quote

ex·plo·sion (k-splzhn)
n.
1.
a. A release of mechanical, chemical, or nuclear energy in a sudden and often violent manner with the generation of high temperature and usually with the release of gases.

Source

Actually, that would be *you* that's ill-informed. Remember your claims of 'people heard explosions' and 'explosions breaking windows'?

Remember the photo of kallend and the thermite - do you see him wearing blast gear like EOD would wear? No? Neither did I.

Have you ever actually SEEN a thermite reaction? I have - I've used it to weld ground buses at communications sites.

Guess what? It goes "hisssssssssssssssssssss"....not 'boom'.

SO...where were the explosives?

Why didn't people see them?

Why didn't people see the miles of wiring?

Why didn't people see the partially demolished walls and partially cut frame members?

Why didn't people see the hundreds of people it would take to do this work, over the weeks / months it would take to accomplish?

How did the explosives NOT go off when the planes hit, or when the burning jet fuel sprayed all over, but DID go off perfectly on signal?

How is it that all these explosives went off with NO seismic signal ever being generated?

How is that, with ALL the people that would be involved, NOBODY has come forward at all?

Why would a government that would kill several thousand of it's own citizens leave the loose change team and truthers alive?

Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706