IS THIS FUCKING LEGIT?

[Belgian_Draft 0]

Quote

This posting style is pretty common on the internet, and the question of why people continue to respond to it is interesting to me. I think I do because I see it as a challenge in communication. If getting your point across wasn't difficult it wouldn't be worth doing. But if someone's attitude makes communication impossible, it isn't worth doing either.

Responding to Lucky's posts is kinda like paying to see the freak show at a carnival. You know what you are going to get in return is 90% BS, the rest is not worth paying for, yet you can't help but to give it a shot.

HAMMER:
Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a
kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the
object we are trying to hit.

[Ron 10]

Quote

I think you should take it as a compliment. Now go build me a trailer

Maybe we can all take it down to Mexico and ride around drunk... May I suggest not sitting on the left side near the tire? The right side seems like it would not be a problem.

"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

[airdvr 210]

Quote

I think it is real and legit, but hidden behind the guise of satire. I mean after all, it is teh Onion, the rag of the RW homophobic purveyors of the proposed homophoc 28th Amendment. Of course you a nd yours support the proposed 28th, yet claim this is pure satire. SNL could pull this off as pure humor, when teh Onion does it, it has a solid foundation of it being meant.

Hmmm...one wonders why you'd be so offended

Dude...you were in such a hurry to do some right-bashing that you either didn't notice it was the Onion or didn't care. Either way...you came off looking foolish and the more you try to defend yourself the worse it gets.

I guess that's what bothers me about your ILK, as Jeannie puts it. Even the most simple error on your part just can't be admitted.

Please don't dent the planet.

Destinations by Roxanne

[Amazon 7]

Quote

Quote

I think it is real and legit, but hidden behind the guise of satire. I mean after all, it is teh Onion, the rag of the RW homophobic purveyors of the proposed homophoc 28th Amendment. Of course you a nd yours support the proposed 28th, yet claim this is pure satire. SNL could pull this off as pure humor, when teh Onion does it, it has a solid foundation of it being meant.

Hmmm...one wonders why you'd be so offended

Dude...you were in such a hurry to do some right-bashing that you either didn't notice it was the Onion or didn't care. Either way...you came off looking foolish and the more you try to defend yourself the worse it gets.

I guess that's what bothers me about your ILK, as Jeannie puts it. Even the most simple error on your part just can't be admitted.

KEWL... I learn't yall a word.. all three letterrs of it..... want to work on some bigger words next week?

[airdvr 210]

Quote

Quote

Quote

I think it is real and legit, but hidden behind the guise of satire. I mean after all, it is teh Onion, the rag of the RW homophobic purveyors of the proposed homophoc 28th Amendment. Of course you a nd yours support the proposed 28th, yet claim this is pure satire. SNL could pull this off as pure humor, when teh Onion does it, it has a solid foundation of it being meant.

Hmmm...one wonders why you'd be so offended

Dude...you were in such a hurry to do some right-bashing that you either didn't notice it was the Onion or didn't care. Either way...you came off looking foolish and the more you try to defend yourself the worse it gets.

I guess that's what bothers me about your ILK, as Jeannie puts it. Even the most simple error on your part just can't be admitted.

KEWL... I learn't yall a word.. all three letterrs of it..... want to work on some bigger words next week?

Typical...if you only realized how small and bitter responses like that make you look.

Please don't dent the planet.

Destinations by Roxanne

[Amazon 7]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

I think it is real and legit, but hidden behind the guise of satire. I mean after all, it is teh Onion, the rag of the RW homophobic purveyors of the proposed homophoc 28th Amendment. Of course you a nd yours support the proposed 28th, yet claim this is pure satire. SNL could pull this off as pure humor, when teh Onion does it, it has a solid foundation of it being meant.

Hmmm...one wonders why you'd be so offended

Dude...you were in such a hurry to do some right-bashing that you either didn't notice it was the Onion or didn't care. Either way...you came off looking foolish and the more you try to defend yourself the worse it gets.

I guess that's what bothers me about your ILK, as Jeannie puts it. Even the most simple error on your part just can't be admitted.

KEWL... I learn't yall a word.. all three letterrs of it..... want to work on some bigger words next week?

Typical...if you only realized how small and bitter responses like that make you look.

Oooooohhhh touchie arnt we. Talk about lack of a sense of humor... I think we had a some other fucknugget accusing me of that recently.... Even the slightest dig and you are getting all BUTT HURT...

[Belgian_Draft 0]

BUTT HURT ???

HAMMER:
Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a
kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the
object we are trying to hit.

[Amazon 7]

Quote

BUTT HURT ???

Whats wrong.. don't get out much???

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=butt+hurt

[Lucky... 0]

Quote

Quote

I think it is real and legit, but hidden behind the guise of satire. I mean after all, it is teh Onion, the rag of the RW homophobic purveyors of the proposed homophoc 28th Amendment. Of course you a nd yours support the proposed 28th, yet claim this is pure satire. SNL could pull this off as pure humor, when teh Onion does it, it has a solid foundation of it being meant.

Hmmm...one wonders why you'd be so offended

Dude...you were in such a hurry to do some right-bashing that you either didn't notice it was the Onion or didn't care. Either way...you came off looking foolish and the more you try to defend yourself the worse it gets.

I guess that's what bothers me about your ILK, as Jeannie puts it. Even the most simple error on your part just can't be admitted.

I didn't know what the Onion was about and I don't care what a bunch of neo-cons who can't extrapolate GDP and other relevant data think. Is it fun to hammer neo-cons? Yes. Are there abundant avenues by which to slam them? Yes. This is why you take something like me not knowing what the onion is and making an issue of it; what else are you going to do, defend your party's illegitimacy and corrupt fiscal policies? It's called a strawman, used to distract from the main issue.

I've admitted several times that I didn't check what the Onion was. Look, I was listening to Limbaugh and Hannity as aco-worker listens to it and I don't object. SO after hearing the garbage from that radio show, nothing surprises me. I thought the Onion was a RW rag and made a satirical skit not meaning it, but really meaning it. I think I've stated that several times.

[1969912 0]

"Once we got to the point where twenty/something's needed a place on the corner that changed the oil in their cars we were doomed . . ."
-NickDG

[Lucky... 0]

Quote

Imported from another thread:

The irony is that I'm being made fun of for not knowing the Onion by people who believe Obama is a Muslim terrorist and that death squads are all a part of the HC Bill.

Did I just describe you?

[champu 1]

I didn't link to Mike's post. I linked to your post. The one where you stated that, as you expected, no one answered your questions. Then you called everyone either stubborn or dirtbags (the construction of the two statements makes it hard to tell which.) This post was 11 posts after I attempted to address your questions. You apparently ignored that post.

And Marg wasn't name dropping, she was stating that there are different flavors of deterrence theory as recognized by different people in the field, some of which have the problems you pointed out, some of which address those problems. You ignored that aspect of what she was saying. I posted a link to a collection of papers on deterrence theory later in the thread (some of which were written by those Marg mentioned) and you ignored that saying, nope it's hopeless to try and deter AQ, we need to be like Sweeden 'cause they don't mess with people. I responded to that statement of yours too, and you ignored that.

Anyone who has hopes of changing the thoughts you bring with you into a thread is deluding themselves.

[Ron 10]

Still waiting for an answer for post #114 of this thread... Like I said, I knew you would not bother to answer. You avoid any real discussions preferring to throw insults and call others names.

I answered your question.... Now answer mine.

I see you espouse typical things from the left, how are you different from garden variety LW? Are you even going to answer this question?... I'd bet not.

"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

[ryan_d_sucks 0]

Hahaha, seriously?.. I think the "parenting an effeminant child" was just a funny concept, so they made a skit about it.. Don't read too far into it. Sheesh.

[timmyfitz 0]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

I think it is real and legit, but hidden behind the guise of satire. I mean after all, it is teh Onion, the rag of the RW homophobic purveyors of the proposed homophoc 28th Amendment. Of course you a nd yours support the proposed 28th, yet claim this is pure satire. SNL could pull this off as pure humor, when teh Onion does it, it has a solid foundation of it being meant.

Hmmm...one wonders why you'd be so offended

Dude...you were in such a hurry to do some right-bashing that you either didn't notice it was the Onion or didn't care. Either way...you came off looking foolish and the more you try to defend yourself the worse it gets.

I guess that's what bothers me about your ILK, as Jeannie puts it. Even the most simple error on your part just can't be admitted.

KEWL... I learn't yall a word.. all three letterrs of it..... want to work on some bigger words next week?

Typical...if you only realized how small and bitter responses like that make you look.

Oooooohhhh touchie arnt we. Talk about lack of a sense of humor... I think we had a some other fucknugget accusing me of that recently.... Even the slightest dig and you are getting all BUTT HURT...

Yep, very typical.

[Lucky... 0]

Quote

Quote

Quote

I don't know WTF you're talking about. The Onion is comedy.

In fact here's one on the front page today, making fun of a conservative:
http://www.theonion.com/content/news/area_man_passionate_defender_of

It appears you're right http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Onion

The Onion taken seriously - Upon occasion, the straight-faced manner in which The Onion reports non-existent happenings has resulted in outside parties mistakenly citing Onion stories as real news.

I've seen people cite the Onion here before too, their humor is so typical of what radical media would state that it's very well disguised satire.

So, in an effort to legitimize the Onion, you cite Wikipedia??

Of course Wikipedia supports your claim, so you are actually stepping on your own dick here.

[Lucky... 0]

Quote

I see the question mark... I know what it denotes. WE all knew the Onion is a satire site and only YOU were foolish enough to buy into it. Don't blame US for YOU being taken in by a joke.

I'm willing ot bet that many on the train didn't know of the Onion either way. I thought it was a RW rag and they played a skit satirizing gya or could-be gay kids. I thought they were performing satire of an issue to show how they felt behind the guise of satire as an excuse. Tell me, is that so far off to what the RW thinks? I hope you aren't straying up late wringing your fists in glee that I had really no or little knowledge of the Onion. There is life after Lucky and the Onion. You may have to consult a counselor, but I'm sure you can come to terms with all this.

Quote

Wow... 100% pure partisan. I find it amazing that is the only way you can think.

BTW, you just wrote, 'back peddle' for, 'backpedal.' Not only did you grossly misspell it, but you made it 2 words. Drop the ridiculousness and pretend you can address the issue.

OK, now address the ellusive death squads and Obama's secret Muslim rug he throws down between media speeches

Quote

Your posting history seems to indicate that you DON'T like to hear opposing views. And, I don't know what hos is btw.

I want to hear them backed by fact/data. Nor do I know what back peddle is. (hos = his quite obviously).

Quote

That does not mean I listen to him. It only means that YOU think my views align with his. I am willing to bet you don't know my views on most things and only focus on the ones you dislike.

I don't care what your views are, I think they are typical RW neo-con. Ok, let's debate issues.

Quote

The from what you told me then, you MUST listen to the left's speakers if you have the same general leanings.

No, I am mostly left but am pro-gun and anti-Aff Action. Enough about you and me (and spelling/typos we all make), let's talk issues.

Quote

For one, I don't think anyone fits just one particular mold... You seem to need to label people to feel better... No matter if that label does not fit, you try to force it to fit for YOUR benefit.

I paraphrase them in groups. But I don't focus on it, I'd rather talk issues, but I know what to expect when I see a person's name.

Quote

How am I different than the "garden variety" RW? Glad you asked.... I wonder if you will honestly listen to the reply?.... I doubt it.

Why waste your time with rhetoric like this, there's a world of typos to correct.

Quote

1. I don't care if gays marry. I DO think calling it a civil union would make things MUCH easier. Hell, *I* didn't want to get married; I just wanted the legal rights my wife and I now have.

TRANSLATION: Illegalize gay marriage in leiu of civil unions to prohibit benefits to those icky people.

Quote

2. I think some form of welfare is needed.... But I think that more focus should be on programs to get people off of the Govt tit than just hand out checks. I'd be fine with mandatory drug screening and counseling if you are on welfare. I'd rather see money spent on education to PREVENT people needing welfare.

- Yep, like free comprehensive education. Of course your party(s) don't agrree with that, so your vote goes to pevent your beliefs.

- I'm for drug screening too. I'm for legalization, but I think druggies, pot smokers on up are idiots.

Quote

3. I think we have spent enough time in Iraq and need to get out. You can't force others to be democratic, I can't think of a single war against insurgencies that was actually won. And the cost of the war is too high both in men and dollars.

Yep. It's unwinnable even if we had a rt to be there.

Quote

4. I think that taxes pretty much have to be raised to control the debt... BUT I think we should cut spending first... Fix the hole in the boat before we just try to get a bigger bucket.

Another cop-out. But, er, cut spending a WHOLE bunch and raise taxes a little. Why not do em both simultaneously? GWB and Clinton did; how'd that work out. You praise guys who do teh opposite of what you just wrote, I find little sincerity in your assertion.

Quote

5. I don't care if they legalize Marijuana. And if it can be shown to provide medicinal benefits, I think we would be stupid not to look more into that. I think the States have the right to legalize it without the DEA getting involved.

Me too, I think it's trash as well as many users of it, but a person should have the right to be a turd.

Quote

There are more.... As I have said time after time I am libertarian according to most tests and conversations I have had with people. But you always try to dismiss that as a Reb in disguise.

Virtually all Libers vote R and you fucking know it. They are more compelled by their fiscal mandates than their liberally moral desires. Look at Ron Paul flip-flopping; exemplary.

Quote

To put it into "Left and Right" so you can understand; I am financially Conservative, and Socially Liberal.

So I can understand (rolls eyes). I think I defined a Liberatrian in here and elsewhere as that how many years ago? How many Dems have you voted for (pres)?

Quote

I see you espouse typical things from the left, how are you different from garden variety LW? Are you even going to answer this question?... I'd bet not.

I'm pro-guns and anti-AA as I stated above and have stated several times. See, I'm ok with being lib, unlike you with being a conservative/Repub..... it's ok, I know it's icky to be a Republican, but it's ok.

Quote

Nonsense... I think this is just you needing to label again. I think the leftist nutjob and the righty nutjob are both nutjobs. You only see the righty.

Yes and Libertarian NJ's are 3 degrees off Repub NJ's.

Quote

No you are damned because you constantly jump on people for sources you don't like and you stupidly (not intended as an insult, just a fact) used a satire site as a reference.

You are damned because YOU REFUSE TO DROP IT.

THAT IS THE SECOND TIME YOU'VE CALLED ME STUPID SINCE YOUR GROSS PA AND SUBSEQUENT PSUDO APOLOGY; HOW MANY TIMES ARE YOU GOING TO DO THAT BEFORE BANNING?

- Sources I don't like? Anything with a bias is one I don't like, left or right.

- I used a satire site thinking it was a RW rag, I agree that is not admissable. Unlike the neo-cons who will argue the Heritage Foundation is credible; diff is that once it is made apparent to me that an errant ref is made I agree. Get it?

- What am I not dropping?

Quote

Nope, thats pretty stupid as well... Now show me where I have replied to him in this thread?

Point is you didn't make note of it either way. Hell, you, the misspeller, corrects misspellings of, well, I guess only me, I haven't seen otherwise - perhaps you are spell-nanny to others as well. But you are quick to jump some - not all; that's my point.

Quote

Fact is by the time I even noticed his post you had already pointed it out and he had already fixed it. YOU on the other hand were claiming the Onion was a RW wing rag till today.

Really? Read much? Post 19 on Nov 15 I wrote:

http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?do=post_view_flat;post=3728265;page=1;sb=post_latest_reply;so=ASC;mh=25;

It appears you're right http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Onion

The Onion taken seriously - Upon occasion, the straight-faced manner in which The Onion reports non-existent happenings has resulted in outside parties mistakenly citing Onion stories as real news.

I've seen people cite the Onion here before too, their humor is so typical of what radical media would state that it's very well disguised satire.

You don't know what you're talking about, but you're good for spell-checking, that is, as a fellow misspeller that you are.

Quote

And the irony score on these two comments from you are OFF the chart

No, your spell-check nannying is off the irony charts.

Quote

BTW YOU of ALL people should not be bashing a guy for typo's

Are you defending yourself, or is this just another..... back peddle [SIC]?

[Ron 10]

Quote

I'm willing ot [SIC] bet that many on the train didn't know of the Onion either way. I thought it was a RW rag

And you don't get the irony of you getting duped while at the same time belittling others sources? REALLY????

Again, if you just admitted it and moved on this would have been a non-issue.

Quote

BTW, you just wrote, 'back peddle' for, 'backpedal.' Not only did you grossly misspell it, but you made it 2 words. Drop the ridiculousness and pretend you can address the issue.

Congrats... You caught me. See how I don't care? I hope you enjoyed your little "victory"

Besides that would be like one compared to your 500.

Quote

OK, now address the ellusive death squads and Obama's secret Muslim rug he throws down between media speeches

Never said any of that... Quit making up things.

Quote

I want to hear them backed by fact/data.

When they are, you just ignore them.

Quote

I don't care what your views are, I think they are typical RW neo-con.

Then it just proves how little you know, and how little you pay attention. You are more interested in thinking you are right than really knowing the truth... And this post of yours shows it.

Quote

TRANSLATION: Illegalize [SIC] gay marriage in leiu [SIC] of civil unions to prohibit benefits to those icky people.

Wrong..... And BTW maybe you should not use words you don't know how to spell... It weakens your position.

Quote

Another cop-out. But, er, cut spending a WHOLE bunch and raise taxes a little. Why not do em both simultaneously?

Another knee jerk reaction from you.... Why not do both? How about you FIX the problem before you try the bandaid. Your ilk only understands raising taxes.... But you should be smart enough to know that with increased income, comes increased spending So an increase in taxes is just going to be spent and not go to pay down the debt.

Quote

Virtually all Libers vote R and you fucking know it. They are more compelled by their fiscal mandates than their liberally moral desires.

Yes, but that does not make them neo-cons like you always (wrongly) claim.

Quote

So I can understand

Yes, because you repeatedly ignore what we actually SAY and somehow come to the conclusion that anyone that does not agree with you is a neo-con. You only see left and right... I don't think you can fathom the idea of a middle, or a person who has split views.

Quote

I'm ok with being lib, unlike you with being a conservative/Repub

Lame personal attack aside (can you have a debate without calling people names???) Notice I have not called you a lib? Huh.. Funny, yet you lambaste anyone that dares disagree with you as a neo-con.

Quote

THAT IS THE SECOND TIME YOU'VE CALLED ME STUPID

Nope, you need to work on your understanding... I said what you DID was stupid, not that YOU are stupid. And what you did WAS stupid.... Especially in light of your repeated attacks on others sources.

Quote

diff is that once it is made apparent to me that an errant ref is made I agree

No, you then tried to use Wiki to prove you were not wrong... Let is go, you screwed up.

Quote

Point is you didn't make note of it either way.

It was fixed before I saw it... you want me to go back in time?

Quote

You don't know what you're talking about, but you're good for spell-checking, that is, as a fellow misspeller that you are.

I was gonna let you get your little "win"... Now, not so much.

Back.... As in back up, duh.

PEDDLE as in: Informal To seek to disseminate; give out: peddling lies.

tr) to advocate (ideas) persistently or importunately to peddle a new philosophy

Sounds apropos to me.....

Quote

Are you defending yourself, or is this just another..... back peddle [SIC]?

Not defending... Just once again pointing out the irony of YOU being so wrong yet trying to bring others down...

1. You use the Onion as a RW source... Then defend it tooth and nail.

2. You misspell ALL the time... I "misspell" one word and you act all high and mighty.

"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

[Lucky... 0]

I have to go to work, but you continuing your laughable little spelling nannying would be akin to me denying I though the Onion was a RW rag, I did and we get on, you still continue your ridiculous rant of trying to indicate a 'fat-finger typing error of hitting an adjacent key is important to an issue. Even you fellow neo-cons aren't that desperate. And 'back peddle' should not only be 1 word, but it is bastardized. That's not a misspelling, it's a total lack of understanding. But hey, I would never point it out WITH ANYONE unless they showed a total abundance of desperation and continued to cite quicky typing errors like I make.

When I first started posting I did that, I thought the quality of the proofread somehow indicated the quality of the content. I grew up a long time ago. Lawrocket makes them too, it's probbaly a sign of him being a busy guy; so what, I look at what he meant. Dude, after back peddle you look silly to continue your spell check nannying, esp since your hero, GWB couldn't even speak, let alone type/write.

I'll answer the rest tonight. And just so you don't go board today, I'll give you that context/usage error with a 'b.' Enjoy it, it's still not as lame as 'back peddle.'

[Ron 10]

Quote

I have to go to work

I didn't realize panhandlers kept regular hours... But I guess it makes sense.

Quote

you still continue your ridiculous rant of trying to indicate a 'fat-finger typing error of hitting an adjacent key is important to an issue

I never claimed it... I just used the proper method to note the error was in the original text. Don't blame ME for YOUR errors.

Quote

I grew up a long time ago.

Your name calling shows otherwise.

Quote

But hey, I would never point it out WITH ANYONE unless they showed a total abundance of desperation and continued to cite quicky [SIC] typing errors like I make.

You gonna claim that quickly was the correct word to use there?

It would either be:

A. Quick typing errors like I make.
B. Quickly typed errors like I make.

I can play grammar nazi if you would really like.... Or you could just accept that using [SIC] is proper etiquette when quoting original text that contained errors and move along.

"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

[Belgian_Draft 0]

Quote

But hey, I would never point it out WITH ANYONE unless they showed a total abundance of desperation and continued to cite quicky typing errors like I make.

Wow. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.

HAMMER:
Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a
kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the
object we are trying to hit.

[rehmwa 2]

Quote

I can't believe you morons have kept this thread alive.
Yes, I can.

thanks, I can stop at that post

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

[Lucky... 0]

Quote

Quote

But hey, I would never point it out WITH ANYONE unless they showed a total abundance of desperation and continued to cite quicky typing errors like I make.

Wow. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.

Dude, like Andy said and I proposed, either unblock PM's or just quit addressing me; it's trashing teh forum. Do you give a fuck about others here? They don't enjoy it. Show a little respect to this place.

[Belgian_Draft 0]

Quote

Quote

Quote

But hey, I would never point it out WITH ANYONE unless they showed a total abundance of desperation and continued to cite quicky typing errors like I make.

Wow. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.

Dude, like Andy said and I proposed, either unblock PM's or just quit addressing me; it's trashing teh forum. Do you give a fuck about others here? They don't enjoy it. Show a little respect to this place.

Oh, I have respect for the forum, that is not a problem. I just find it very amusing that you harp and harp about one typo on my part and then post a reply like that.
Of course, if showing respect means agreeing with your BS, then all bets are off.

HAMMER:
Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a
kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the
object we are trying to hit.

[timmyfitz 0]

Quote

Quote

Quote

But hey, I would never point it out WITH ANYONE unless they showed a total abundance of desperation and continued to cite quicky typing errors like I make.

Wow. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.

Dude, like Andy said and I proposed, either unblock PM's or just quit addressing me; it's trashing teh forum. Do you give a fuck about others here? They don't enjoy it. Show a little respect to this place.

If you quit addressing him(whoever him is) he has nothing to reply to. You don't need to get in the last word just because you think your pride will be hurt. No reason to defend your pride on some obscure website. Stop posting and it ends. Simple.

I await your response.