0
warpedskydiver

Obama Rejects all Military / Nat Security Options

Recommended Posts

I have no doubt that the President is weighing the options very carefully, and I do not fault him for that. I do fault him for the amount of time he seems to be taking doing it though. That indicates to me that this is not getting his daily attention, and thus it is also not receiving significant amounts of his schedule at any one time either.

To those that would argue, "he's just being pragmatic", I disagree, he is being dispassionate at best, uncompassionate more likely. By taking so much time, there is less continuity of thought, and less recollection of ideas. Given the previously noted lack of direct contact between commanders in the battle field and the Commander-in-Chief, President Obama is not balancing his input. He is not leading. He is not seeking a practical process or solution leading to a conclusion (pragmatic).

Unless he pulls a rabbit out of his hat, I don't see anyone being satisfied with his decision -- if he adds more troops, the "right" will say, "Why did that have to take so long? How many lives did that cost?" If he takes a different path, the war opponents will say the exact same thing, adding to the list of broken promises by the way.

So, the President definitely has to think deeply and clearly on this, that much is certain. While taking his time is his prerogative, he has simply taken too much time, effectively turning his back on those in theater -- THAT is inexcusable.
So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I disagree that waiting to make a decision is turning his back on those in theater. It's not like those in theater are not getting the same logistical and command support they got before.

If you're worried about morale, then the people doing the most damage to morale are the pundits and Republicans who are trying to convince everyone that Obama hates the troops. That shit is inappropriate at best.

- Dan G

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[reply

But you have nothing to say, in fact all you do is attempt to fuck with others, I think there is a sticky on your behavior.



Actually, you don't appear to have anything to say either.

Either elaborate, or stop looking silly with all the "I'd tell you but then I'd have to kill you" crap. Who knows, the POTUS might actually ask you for advice. After all, we know that DZ.com is the administration's go to source for excellent policy advice....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Obama is a darker version of LBJ.

Rejecting the recommendations of his top military experts reeks of his lack of respect and lack of experience in thse matters.



The 'top military experts' have been at this since 2001. At what point do they review the lessons learned by the Soviets about indefinite fighting in this place? He's right to question them hard and long before sending tens of thousands more there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Obama is a darker version of LBJ.

Rejecting the recommendations of his top military experts reeks of his lack of respect and lack of experience in thse matters.



The 'top military experts' have been at this since 2001. At what point do they review the lessons learned by the Soviets about indefinite fighting in this place? He's right to question them hard and long before sending tens of thousands more there.



Gotta love the way politics works. We've got a lawyer dictating military strategy, union bosses running the department of labor, drunks making healthcare policies, tax cheats running the treasury, and adulterers making laws about gay marriage.

Do you really expect the 'top military experts' to consider the economic aspects of a continued and drawn-out war when congress won't even do it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Gotta love the way politics works. We've got a lawyer dictating military strategy,



Like it or not, the American military is and always has been under the control of the civilian Executive branch; the President is the Commander in Chief of the military; there is no legal or Constitutional requirement that the President be a military veteran; and 26 of the 43 presidents (Cleveland had 2 non-consecutive presidencies) - or 60% - are or were lawyers. Don't like that? Petition Congress to propose an amendment to the Constitution.

Quote

union bosses running the department of labor



And corporate bosses run the Department of Commerce and the Federal Reserve. Seems logical.

Quote

drunks making healthcare policies



Drunks need plenty of health care, and they know how to get it. Logical.

Quote

tax cheats running the treasury



Expertise. Logical. (Google: "it takes a thief".)

Quote

and adulterers making laws about gay marriage.



See, "Treasury".

Quote

Do you really expect the 'top military experts' to consider the economic aspects of a continued and drawn-out war when congress won't even do it?



Of course. Any top General or Admiral who doesn't consider the economics is a fool.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>We've got a lawyer dictating military strategy, union bosses running the
>department of labor, drunks making healthcare policies, tax cheats
>running the treasury, and adulterers making laws about gay marriage.

If only we had accomplished Internet experts to make all those decisions, the world would be a better place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Do you really expect the 'top military experts' to consider the economic aspects of a continued and drawn-out war when congress won't even do it?



I'm not even thinking about the economical aspects. Just the large number of soldiers lost with no real prospects for turning the corner. Just like the Russians found in the early 80s.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi WS

I support our troops and their families.

I'm sorry about the soldiers that lost their lives in Iraq/Afghan, getting more of our troops killed isn't going to add honor to those that have already fallen.

I do not support the war in afghan. The afghans have a army let them handle it.
One Jump Wonder

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I disagree that waiting to make a decision is turning his back on those in theater. It's not like those in theater are not getting the same logistical and command support they got before.

If you're worried about morale, then the people doing the most damage to morale are the pundits and Republicans who are trying to convince everyone that Obama hates the troops. That shit is inappropriate at best.



I'm not talking about morale. During the past four months that this decision has been in "deliberation", units preparing to re-deply could have been extended, units preparing to deploy could have accelerated their movement, logistical in effect would be enhanced.

None of this has been done. A commander put in place by the President to assess the situation, informs the President that more assets are needed. Significantly more assets, 60,000 troops is roughly three whole divisions. This wasn't a tactical assessment.

The military can be a lumbering inefficient body, but when things need to move, they can move fast. A commander's assessment estimates less than a year to stem the tide. President Obama has now used 33% of that time to "reflect".
So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I guess I just don't see why any of that will have changed. There are always units preparing the deploy/redeploy. There was nothing magical about the day McChrystal made his recommendations.

Again, how is making an informed decision turning his back on those in theater?

- Dan G

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I guess I just don't see why any of that will have changed. There are always units preparing the deploy/redeploy. There was nothing magical about the day McChrystal made his recommendations.

Again, how is making an informed decision turning his back on those in theater?



It doesn't take four months to make an informed decision.
So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Rejecting the recommendations of his top military experts reeks of his lack of respect and lack of experience in thse matters.



I disagree, it shows he is standing by his commitment to 'change'.

It shows great leadership and that he is being rational and tactical whilst improving the foreign opinion of the US miltary.

The US's tendency to go in a 'schmoke em out' without thought in the past, is what has created more long term problems than it has solved.

If the republicans were in, lockheed martin and other such entities would be rubbing thier hands together.

Obama really does 'seem' to be a man of his word. But more time is needed to know for sure.
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Rejecting the recommendations of his top military experts reeks of his lack of respect and lack of experience in thse matters.



It shows great leadership and that he is being rational and tactical whilst improving the foreign opinion of the US miltary.



Based on those I've met that serve with foreign military, opinion of the US military is just fine, where it matters.
So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Unless he pulls a rabbit out of his hat, I don't see anyone being satisfied with his decision -- if he adds more troops, the "right" will say, "Why did that have to take so long? How many lives did that cost?" If he takes a different path, the war opponents will say the exact same thing, adding to the list of broken promises by the way.




That is why it is important for him to make the decision that helps his long term goals.

he has inhereted this mess from warmongers that showed little respect for human life and US international relations.

it will take some time to work out the repercussions of each manoever. this seems to be where america has lacked in the past so it is abreath of fresh air to see a US presedent not look like a puppet of the arms manufacturers.

terrific!

it seems the dutch have had good progress there, my father is an ex green beret commando and has access to thier information. thay are much more covert about it.

Maybe the US military could take some lessons?
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Maybe the US military could take some lessons?



Since they take direction from the politicians, to execute a political goal, I don't see that the military have a lesson to learn here.
So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some points:

It's all about a better life. Define, in terms you and your force will understand, what a better life is for those you have come to help. And make it happen.

You don't have to kill a man to kill his courage. In COIN, you may only need to kill his resentment.

less is more. Do not rush to failure; a forced coalition solution will not last - one that recognises local concerns may last a lifetime.

Crime pays. Corruption and crime are a cancer to real progress. ID the criminal cultural norm and use it as a benchmark against which to drive crime down, bettering peoples lives. Now there's a fucking challenge...

Vietnam was lost in the living rooms of the USA not on the battlefields of SE Asia....

If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue, if you can walk with kings and not lose the common touch...It's not about rank. Listen to those who oppose the fight, those you are fighting and those who might just get you out of the fight. Academic or diplomatic credentials do not out weigh experience and common sense.

Doctrine must be continually adjusted, drawn from current operational reality.

And possibly the most important point; NATO must chose being either fully comitted to Afghanistan or just fuck off.:)
.


'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Don't you have a national socialist meeting to conduct?


Now run along so you won't be late.



Is that your version of a substantive post?

I am still waiting on your answers. If you have forgotten what the questions were, just scroll up in this thread.

Its okay, I have top secret clearance, Spectre himself signed for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0