Andy9o8 2 #51 November 4, 2009 QuoteQuote Sounds more like a Limbaughism. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck&feature=player_embedded Here's a radio interview with Obama, well maybe it's Limbaugh doing an impression, you decide. OK, I just listened to it. Despite the sensationalist (and very inaccurate) over-screen caption, he did not say that "the constitution should have been radically reinterpreted to force redistribution of wealth for African Americans" as the caption states. That kind of Fox-style spin is horseshit, and should be repudiated. (And with all due respect, nor did he even imply that "the Constitution is an obstacle, just getting in the way of doing good.") What he did say was that because the civil rights movement became so "court-oriented" in terms of operative tactics, that community organizing and grassroots groups that might have brought about redistributive change took a back seat, and became weakened; and that that weakening (of community-organized grassroots groups) has persisted over the long run. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #52 November 4, 2009 QuoteQuote Sounds more like a Limbaughism. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck&feature=player_embedded Here's a radio interview with Obama, well maybe it's Limbaugh doing an impression, you decide. Fascinating how the captions claim that he said something that he definitely did NOT say in the interview. Nice try, but FAIL.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #53 November 5, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuotemy point was that from the statement, apathy was inferred. Apathy is bad for this country. The statement wasn't an example of apathy. The fact of the matter is that the judicial interpretation of the Constitution is the only one that carries any legal weight. well those of us who know the difference between the words infer and imply know why I chose the word "inferred". So, you're saying that you inferred something completely different from what I wrote. Fair enough.Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cliffwhite 0 #54 November 5, 2009 Quote[. The fact of the matter is that the judicial interpretation of the Constitution is the only one that carries any legal weight.[/reply Was it Jackson (leave it to a black man) that said screw that Supreme Court ruling, I'm gonna do it any how because I have the military ? Blues, Cliff, cLIFF2muchTruth Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Andy9o8 2 #55 November 5, 2009 QuoteWas it Jackson (leave it to a black man) that said screw that Supreme Court ruling, I'm gonna do it any how because I have the military ? Actually, I think Jackson (leave it to a black man) said these things: Quotes Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rhaig 0 #56 November 5, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuotemy point was that from the statement, apathy was inferred. Apathy is bad for this country. The statement wasn't an example of apathy. The fact of the matter is that the judicial interpretation of the Constitution is the only one that carries any legal weight. well those of us who know the difference between the words infer and imply know why I chose the word "inferred". So, you're saying that you inferred something completely different from what I wrote. Fair enough. it appears that way. I didn't want to say "you implied" because I was inferring a meaning from what you wrote. I don't want to assume I know what you're trying to say. I see others do taht here.-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites jcd11235 0 #57 November 5, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuotemy point was that from the statement, apathy was inferred. Apathy is bad for this country. The statement wasn't an example of apathy. The fact of the matter is that the judicial interpretation of the Constitution is the only one that carries any legal weight. well those of us who know the difference between the words infer and imply know why I chose the word "inferred". So, you're saying that you inferred something completely different from what I wrote. Fair enough. it appears that way. I didn't want to say "you implied" because I was inferring a meaning from what you wrote. I don't want to assume I know what you're trying to say. I see others do taht here. Your last reply was entirely too classy for Speakers Corner.Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rhaig 0 #58 November 5, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuotemy point was that from the statement, apathy was inferred. Apathy is bad for this country. The statement wasn't an example of apathy. The fact of the matter is that the judicial interpretation of the Constitution is the only one that carries any legal weight. well those of us who know the difference between the words infer and imply know why I chose the word "inferred". So, you're saying that you inferred something completely different from what I wrote. Fair enough. it appears that way. I didn't want to say "you implied" because I was inferring a meaning from what you wrote. I don't want to assume I know what you're trying to say. I see others do taht here. Your last reply was entirely too classy for Speakers Corner. oh yeah? well eat shit and die you liberal commie bastard! :)-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 Next Page 3 of 3 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
Andy9o8 2 #55 November 5, 2009 QuoteWas it Jackson (leave it to a black man) that said screw that Supreme Court ruling, I'm gonna do it any how because I have the military ? Actually, I think Jackson (leave it to a black man) said these things: Quotes Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhaig 0 #56 November 5, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuotemy point was that from the statement, apathy was inferred. Apathy is bad for this country. The statement wasn't an example of apathy. The fact of the matter is that the judicial interpretation of the Constitution is the only one that carries any legal weight. well those of us who know the difference between the words infer and imply know why I chose the word "inferred". So, you're saying that you inferred something completely different from what I wrote. Fair enough. it appears that way. I didn't want to say "you implied" because I was inferring a meaning from what you wrote. I don't want to assume I know what you're trying to say. I see others do taht here.-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #57 November 5, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuotemy point was that from the statement, apathy was inferred. Apathy is bad for this country. The statement wasn't an example of apathy. The fact of the matter is that the judicial interpretation of the Constitution is the only one that carries any legal weight. well those of us who know the difference between the words infer and imply know why I chose the word "inferred". So, you're saying that you inferred something completely different from what I wrote. Fair enough. it appears that way. I didn't want to say "you implied" because I was inferring a meaning from what you wrote. I don't want to assume I know what you're trying to say. I see others do taht here. Your last reply was entirely too classy for Speakers Corner.Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhaig 0 #58 November 5, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuotemy point was that from the statement, apathy was inferred. Apathy is bad for this country. The statement wasn't an example of apathy. The fact of the matter is that the judicial interpretation of the Constitution is the only one that carries any legal weight. well those of us who know the difference between the words infer and imply know why I chose the word "inferred". So, you're saying that you inferred something completely different from what I wrote. Fair enough. it appears that way. I didn't want to say "you implied" because I was inferring a meaning from what you wrote. I don't want to assume I know what you're trying to say. I see others do taht here. Your last reply was entirely too classy for Speakers Corner. oh yeah? well eat shit and die you liberal commie bastard! :)-- Rob Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
