0
kbordson

Personal Freedom

Recommended Posts

Britons Weary of Surveillance in Minor Cases

Quote

POOLE, England — It has become commonplace to call Britain a “surveillance society,” a place where security cameras lurk at every corner, giant databases keep track of intimate personal details and the government has extraordinary powers to intrude into citizens’ lives.



This isn't an attack on England... it's just where the story came from. This could have happened in so many other places.... so lets not take this to a U.S. v. England

Instead I am wondering about the discussion of what Privacy and Freedom should we have from Government.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The idea that the government is tracking an average person's every move or listening and reading every communication is simply ridiculous. While it's true that computers may do this on a gross level, there is simply too much data for anyone to possibly give a shit about the average person as an individual.

True, if you consistently made calls to the wrong people and had a lot of communication with them about certain topics; yeah, you'd be put under additional scrutiny and the government really would start to take a personal interest in your every move and they more than have the capabilities to do that 24/7/365.

However, there is simply not a rats chance in hell the government cares all that much about the average individual nor could they. Even with tons of computer help, they simply don't have the man power to sift through the data of 300 million people's lives and give a shit.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Were you able to read that article in the NYTimes, or was my link blocked? The story was about a single individual and how she had been personally targeted. She didn't call the wrong person. She didn't communicate to anyone about any 007 secrets. She just enrolled her daughter in school.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


....
This isn't an attack on England... it's just where the story came from. This could have happened in so many other places.... so lets not take this to a U.S. v. England

Instead I am wondering about the discussion of what Privacy and Freedom should we have from Government.



http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13145

Germany too is not covering itself with glory on that matter :S

OTOH: Supervision up to a certain degree is justified these days, I do accept that.

dudeist skydiver # 3105

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Were you able to read that article in the NYTimes, or was my link blocked? The story was about a single individual and how she had been personally targeted. She didn't call the wrong person. She didn't communicate to anyone about any 007 secrets. She just enrolled her daughter in school.



I read the article. I thought you were talking about the US and in general though and not the specific case. I can't really speak to the issues in GB and this specific case. They may have some other weird crap going on in this specific case as well we're not privy to, like maybe it' a matter of mistaken identity / people with the same name ect.

Any time there is a huge program involving humans there will occasionally be errors. My guess was the woman's case is a mistake and the article just latches on to it to pump up the anti-government paranoia, which is a great way to sell papers.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Were you able to read that article in the NYTimes, or was my link blocked? The story was about a single individual and how she had been personally targeted. She didn't call the wrong person. She didn't communicate to anyone about any 007 secrets. She just enrolled her daughter in school.



I read the article. I thought you were talking about the US and in general though and not the specific case. I can't really speak to the issues in GB and this specific case. They may have some other weird crap going on in this specific case as well we're not privy to, like maybe it' a matter of mistaken identity / people with the same name ect.

Any time there is a huge program involving humans there will occasionally be errors. My guess was the woman's case is a mistake and the article just latches on to it to pump up the anti-government paranoia, which is a great way to sell papers.



I wasn't specifically trying to just justify or attack this case, but when you commented that "there is simply not a rats chance in hell the government cares all that much about the average individual", then I didn't know if you had been about to read about this "rats chance."

But, you are right. I didn't just want to make it about this case, but in general, should the government be ALLOWED to spy on people?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

, should the government be ALLOWED to spy on people?



That's a good question but not all of the cameras in the U.K are government owned or operated..... and that's really scary.

(.)Y(.)
Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

, should the government be ALLOWED to spy on people?



That's a good question but not all of the cameras in the U.K are government owned or operated..... and that's really scary.



Agreed. You have FAR more to worry about from "Little Brother" down the street or in your work place, than "Big Brother" in your nation's capitol.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:P

but it's sympomatic of a bigger problem ..... My data s MINE... be that my location, medical records or what every.. I don't want Big or little brother accessing that ...,. especially without my consent or even knowledge.

(.)Y(.)
Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

You have FAR more to worry about from "Little Brother" down the street or in your work place, than "Big Brother" in your nation's capitol.



I disagree. Little Brother can take steps to damage your reputation. Big Brother can do far more, can he not? What makes you think that Big Brother is only in the nation's capitol? I myself can think of several other brothers in Sacramento. As well as Fresno County and the City.

These brothers can all do things little brother cannot. Erin Andrews was publicly embarrassed by little brother. Perhaps little brother is a snitch to big brother - there's the big possible problem.

Little brother cannot imprison me. Big brothers can.


My wife is hotter than your wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


However, there is simply not a rats chance in hell the government cares all that much about the average individual nor could they. Even with tons of computer help, they simply don't have the man power to sift through the data of 300 million people's lives and give a shit.



The recent development in facial recognition technology threatens this thought. The storage costs would preclude going back in time far, but we're not far from being able to automatically track people through a network of cameras.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

You have FAR more to worry about from "Little Brother" down the street or in your work place, than "Big Brother" in your nation's capitol.



I disagree. Little Brother can take steps to damage your reputation. Big Brother can do far more, can he not? What makes you think that Big Brother is only in the nation's capitol? I myself can think of several other brothers in Sacramento. As well as Fresno County and the City.

These brothers can all do things little brother cannot. Erin Andrews was publicly embarrassed by little brother. Perhaps little brother is a snitch to big brother - there's the big possible problem.

Little brother cannot imprison me. Big brothers can.



Yeah, but Big Brother doesn't have a reason and Little Brother can be a major asshole just because he's bored.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Anyone interested in this needs to watch The Last Enemy, a British "Masterpiece Theater" type mini-series.

It is excellent and thought provoking.



This is interesting;
The entire episodes are available on YouTube.
Here is the first one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8kbqCKe8Ymo
"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Analyzing the information coming to them is like trying to take sips from
>a fire hose.

Indeed. But the devices that take sips from that firehose are getting faster and larger all the time. Betting that computing power and bandwidth will never be up to a given task is a poor bet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Unless the government starts using an army of robots working 24/7 to arrest people, I'm not too worried.

All the information for minor crimes played out in our daily lives still would swamp the availability of manpower to enforce and arrest.

I guess we could eventually have a system where computers start giving tickets like red light cameras, but I doubt the population would put up with that for very long and all everyone would have to do is refuse to pay which again would force human enforcement back into the equation.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>All the information for minor crimes played out in our daily lives still
>would swamp the availability of manpower to enforce and arrest.

Agreed. But it would not swamp the ability of computers to collect and analyze that information - and that is something we should guard against. Hoping that the ability never arises is a poor strategy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The idea that the government is tracking an average person's every move or listening and reading every communication is simply ridiculous. While it's true that computers may do this on a gross level, there is simply too much data for anyone to possibly give a shit about the average person as an individual.



So, if the smallest details of your personal life are recorded by the government, you're ok with that, because there's so much data that no one will actually give a shit?
-- Tom Aiello

Tom@SnakeRiverBASE.com
SnakeRiverBASE.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Here's an article that reinforces exactly why I have no fear of Big Brother.



Well, ok then, since they're incompetent, having them wantonly violate our rights is all okey-dokey, right?



I don't think they're incompetent. I think they're understaffed for the big tasks at hand and it's impossible for them to give a shit about something as far down the chain as me.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

They may have some other weird crap going on in this specific case as well we're not privy to, like maybe it' a matter of mistaken identity / people with the same name ect.



Yeah.

They confused her with the other person who had applied to enroll their kid at that school, and whom it would have been totally reasonable to tail for three weeks.

Sure. That's it.
-- Tom Aiello

Tom@SnakeRiverBASE.com
SnakeRiverBASE.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I think they're understaffed for the big tasks at hand and it's impossible for them to give a shit about something as far down the chain as me.



And that makes it all ok?

That's like saying it's ok to invade Mexico, because our army is so busy in Iraq and Afghanistan that it won't do much damage in Mexico anyway.
-- Tom Aiello

Tom@SnakeRiverBASE.com
SnakeRiverBASE.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0