rickjump1 0 #26 October 7, 2009 Quote Over the first decade of its life, the program would cost around $37.5 billion, and would start at around $3.25 billion per year. Cramer argues that because the money would be invested through the savings account, it would help spur economic growth. Lawmakers sponsoring the bill have said they would pay for it by making other cuts, but the bill doesn't specify what those cuts would be.Quote Quote doesn't specify what those cuts would be? sounds like another program not getting paid for. the government never seems to tell us what " those cuts " are. Senator salaries?Do your part for global warming: ban beans and hold all popcorn farts. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites marks2065 0 #27 October 7, 2009 only if washington would do something good for the people for once Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 Next Page 2 of 2 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
marks2065 0 #27 October 7, 2009 only if washington would do something good for the people for once Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
