0
Gawain

Which City Will Win the Olympic Games in 2016

Recommended Posts

I posted this here, since for the first time in my memory, a sitting US president lobbied the IOC to try and close the deal. Also, to discuss the repercussions if Chicago does not win the 2016 summer games.

Personally, I'm rooting for the home team, even though I don't agree with their methods. Mayor Daly and the Governor of Illinois should follow the same play book used by previous cities in the US (Atlanta, Salt Lake, Los Angeles, Lake Placid, etc) that won without a Presidential lobby.

Having said that, I think Rio is the one to beat, and I think the fact that an Olympic games has never been held in South America (plus, I've heard that Rio is just an amazing city, though I've never been there) means that the IOC has tough choices to make.

So, what does this mean to President and First Lady Obama if Chicago does not close the deal? Some are of the opinion that this matter has already been settled, and that Chicago is a shoe-in. Understandable since so much of what this President does is choreographed beyond common sense. But, if it's not preordained, and Chicago does not win the games, I think this puts a huge mark against President Obama and his image abroad (since he's still apparently so popular in Europe) as well as his credibility to push an agenda back home.

It's about two hours until we find out. What do you think?
So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If its proposal is at all credible, Rio is definitely the one to beat. It is amazing (I lived there for a couple of years).

The biggest downsides to Rio are the crime rate (high) and the fact that corruption is still pretty endemic in Brazil, meaning both cost and organizational problems. It's a pity, because it's a lovely place with a lot of great people.

Wendy P.
There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

If its proposal is at all credible, Rio is definitely the one to beat. It is amazing (I lived there for a couple of years).

The biggest downsides to Rio are the crime rate (high) and the fact that corruption is still pretty endemic in Brazil, meaning both cost and organizational problems. It's a pity, because it's a lovely place with a lot of great people.

Wendy P.



I would like to see a comparison of crime rates between Rio and Chicago. Chicago has a death rate greater than our casualty rate in Iraq, and corruption....well...you know...:)
So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

If its proposal is at all credible, Rio is definitely the one to beat. It is amazing (I lived there for a couple of years).

The biggest downsides to Rio are the crime rate (high) and the fact that corruption is still pretty endemic in Brazil, meaning both cost and organizational problems. It's a pity, because it's a lovely place with a lot of great people.

Wendy P.



I would like to see a comparison of crime rates between Rio and Chicago. Chicago has a death rate greater than our casualty rate in Iraq, and corruption....well...you know...:)


About the only difference between the two cities is the climate. :S
"Mediocre people don't like high achievers, and high achievers don't like mediocre people." - SIX TIME National Champion coach Nick Saban

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Part of the issue with the presentations this time around is that every other country sent their King Prime Minister or President to lobby to host the games. How would have it looked if the United States was the only party that did not send the current leader to lobby? Spain has King Juan Carlos representing them, Brazil's got President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and Japan's Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama lead their presentation.

I'd say Rio has the lead based on what I've gathered but Chicago is looking better now. I'd say Rio gets the games in the end.
Yesterday is history
And tomorrow is a mystery

Parachutemanuals.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I posted this here, since for the first time in my memory, a sitting US president lobbied the IOC to try and close the deal. Also, to discuss the repercussions if Chicago does not win the 2016 summer games.

Personally, I'm rooting for the home team, even though I don't agree with their methods. Mayor Daly and the Governor of Illinois should follow the same play book used by previous cities in the US (Atlanta, Salt Lake, Los Angeles, Lake Placid, etc) that won without a Presidential lobby.

Having said that, I think Rio is the one to beat, and I think the fact that an Olympic games has never been held in South America (plus, I've heard that Rio is just an amazing city, though I've never been there) means that the IOC has tough choices to make.

So, what does this mean to President and First Lady Obama if Chicago does not close the deal? Some are of the opinion that this matter has already been settled, and that Chicago is a shoe-in. Understandable since so much of what this President does is choreographed beyond common sense. But, if it's not preordained, and Chicago does not win the games, I think this puts a huge mark against President Obama and his image abroad (since he's still apparently so popular in Europe) as well as his credibility to push an agenda back home.

It's about two hours until we find out. What do you think?



How funny, I hit the prompt for a thread about the olympics and I get a presidential thread.

Wait, wait, you say Obama is a Muslim and born in Africa, then why isn't he promoting a city somewhere in Africa for the olympics?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Part of the issue with the presentations this time around is that every other country sent their King Prime Minister or President to lobby to host the games. How would have it looked if the United States was the only party that did not send the current leader to lobby? Spain has King Juan Carlos representing them, Brazil's got President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and Japan's Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama lead their presentation.

I'd say Rio has the lead based on what I've gathered but Chicago is looking better now. I'd say Rio gets the games in the end.



Other countries send their heads-of-state all the time. The US has not done so before. The Mayors or Governors provide a more sincere and credible presentation in my opinion.
So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

If its proposal is at all credible, Rio is definitely the one to beat. It is amazing (I lived there for a couple of years).

The biggest downsides to Rio are the crime rate (high) and the fact that corruption is still pretty endemic in Brazil, meaning both cost and organizational problems. It's a pity, because it's a lovely place with a lot of great people.

Wendy P.



I doubt Rio's coruption is worse than Chicago's;)
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I posted this here, since for the first time in my memory, a sitting US president lobbied the IOC to try and close the deal. Also, to discuss the repercussions if Chicago does not win the 2016 summer games.

Personally, I'm rooting for the home team, even though I don't agree with their methods. Mayor Daly and the Governor of Illinois should follow the same play book used by previous cities in the US (Atlanta, Salt Lake, Los Angeles, Lake Placid, etc) that won without a Presidential lobby.

Having said that, I think Rio is the one to beat, and I think the fact that an Olympic games has never been held in South America (plus, I've heard that Rio is just an amazing city, though I've never been there) means that the IOC has tough choices to make.

So, what does this mean to President and First Lady Obama if Chicago does not close the deal? Some are of the opinion that this matter has already been settled, and that Chicago is a shoe-in. Understandable since so much of what this President does is choreographed beyond common sense. But, if it's not preordained, and Chicago does not win the games, I think this puts a huge mark against President Obama and his image abroad (since he's still apparently so popular in Europe) as well as his credibility to push an agenda back home.

It's about two hours until we find out. What do you think?



How funny, I hit the prompt for a thread about the olympics and I get a presidential thread.

Wait, wait, you say Obama is a Muslim and born in Africa, then why isn't he promoting a city somewhere in Africa for the olympics?



Dude...what the f*ck are you talking about? I state, clearly, and in english, in the first sentence my meaning. I then elaborate on that, and summarize to continue a discussion. One which you chose not to participate in.
So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Chicago out the first round



Just saw that announced. So now it's Rio, Madrid and Tokyo. My wife being Japanese, I'm now rooting for Tokyo. Japan is really cool.
So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Chicago out the first round



Just saw that announced. So now it's Rio, Madrid and Tokyo. My wife being Japanese, I'm now rooting for Tokyo. Japan is really cool.



Now Tokyo is out. Oh well. Rio, here we go!!
So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

I posted this here, since for the first time in my memory, a sitting US president lobbied the IOC to try and close the deal. Also, to discuss the repercussions if Chicago does not win the 2016 summer games.

Personally, I'm rooting for the home team, even though I don't agree with their methods. Mayor Daly and the Governor of Illinois should follow the same play book used by previous cities in the US (Atlanta, Salt Lake, Los Angeles, Lake Placid, etc) that won without a Presidential lobby.

Having said that, I think Rio is the one to beat, and I think the fact that an Olympic games has never been held in South America (plus, I've heard that Rio is just an amazing city, though I've never been there) means that the IOC has tough choices to make.

So, what does this mean to President and First Lady Obama if Chicago does not close the deal? Some are of the opinion that this matter has already been settled, and that Chicago is a shoe-in. Understandable since so much of what this President does is choreographed beyond common sense. But, if it's not preordained, and Chicago does not win the games, I think this puts a huge mark against President Obama and his image abroad (since he's still apparently so popular in Europe) as well as his credibility to push an agenda back home.

It's about two hours until we find out. What do you think?



How funny, I hit the prompt for a thread about the olympics and I get a presidential thread.

Wait, wait, you say Obama is a Muslim and born in Africa, then why isn't he promoting a city somewhere in Africa for the olympics?


Dude...what the f*ck are you talking about? I state, clearly, and in english, in the first sentence my meaning. I then elaborate on that, and summarize to continue a discussion. One which you chose not to participate in.


My point is that all Obama haaters morph most threads back to Dems or Obama and how they are fucking the country up. I guess we were guilty of the same to your boy GWB. B|

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

My point is that all Obama haaters morph most threads back to Dems or Obama and how they are fucking the country up. I guess we were guilty of the same to your boy GWB. B|



I did none of that. Why don't you re-read my post and join the discussion. This trip was a huge departure, and the consequences are indeed political. He couldn't close the deal. That's not "hate", it's reality, and it also brings to light that there are some things that the President should NOT do. I personally believe he diminished the office by going to Copenhagen.
So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0