warpedskydiver 0 #101 September 17, 2009 The correlation on that is 1.00000 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #102 September 17, 2009 QuoteThe fact that someone engages in a lawful self-defense does not negate the fact that in the moments leading up to that self-defense, they were just walking around with a gun in violation of local law. Since when is being in your home (the bill mentioned was about HOME INVASION) 'walking around with a gun'?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #103 September 17, 2009 Quote*cough* rednecks *cough* *coughs*idiots*coughs*Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
livendive 8 #104 September 17, 2009 QuoteQuoteThe fact that someone engages in a lawful self-defense does not negate the fact that in the moments leading up to that self-defense, they were just walking around with a gun in violation of local law. Since when is being in your home (the bill mentioned was about HOME INVASION) 'walking around with a gun'? Where did I say they were walking outside their home? Even if I had, the point wouldn't be worth arguing. The key part is that they were violating a law that the state deemed permissible and that the voters accepted. Blues, Dave"I AM A PROFESSIONAL EXTREME ATHLETE!" (drink Mountain Dew) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
