0
kallend

Interesting article on economics

Recommended Posts

Quote

My ADHD doesn't allow me to read that much online.



What I got out of it:

1) Neoclassical, supply-side macroeconomics (as embraced by fresh-water economists) doesn't work for market collapse. In other words, a completely free market is a really bad thing, bubbles are real.

2) Keynesian, demand-side macro (relegated to salt-water economists) does a better job of describing recessions and depressions, but it's far from perfect.

3) No macro models incorporate core individual financial elements, such as limited capital by individuals and corporations, or the fact that people will pull out of the market entirely to keep their houses.

Author's conclusions summed up here:

Quote

So here’s what I think economists have to do. First, they have to face up to the inconvenient reality that financial markets fall far short of perfection, that they are subject to extraordinary delusions and the madness of crowds. Second, they have to admit — and this will be very hard for the people who giggled and whispered over Keynes — that Keynesian economics remains the best framework we have for making sense of recessions and depressions. Third, they’ll have to do their best to incorporate the realities of finance into macroeconomics.


Trapped on the surface of a sphere. XKCD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0