speedy 0 #51 August 12, 2009 I'm all for cap & trade. It might make skydivers actually pay for the fuel they waste for mere entertainment. $100 a jump anyone? Why not, when you really think about what that energy is worth in terms of human labour. Dave Fallschirmsport Marl Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,120 #52 August 12, 2009 >$100 a jump anyone? Or $28 a jump from an E85-fueled or biodiesel-fueled Cessna 206. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
StreetScooby 5 #53 August 12, 2009 Quote It worked for SOx emissions. That's at a much lower scale. And, I doubt SOx transmission around the globe is as high as that now really bad CO2 molecule. So, we managed to actually measure SOx reductions locally. We won't be able to measure CO2 reductions from our local efforts. Thus, the federal government will have yet another set of numbers they can fudge at will to impose the appropriate taxes on us.We are all engines of karma Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
speedy 0 #54 August 13, 2009 Quote>$100 a jump anyone? Or $28 a jump from an E85-fueled or biodiesel-fueled Cessna 206. Please see attached pic! Dave Fallschirmsport Marl Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
