Recommended Posts
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuote>The affair was with a woman this time.
True, and there were no underage people involved.
For all of you who can't keep up with the republican sex scandal du jour, here's a handy flowchart:
(psst - Mike - this is your cue to get in with a DDIF)
Is Mike not around? Maybe he's "hiking the Appalachian Trail".
No, I didn't bother answering - I already covered the STERLING examples of Mssrs Clinton and Edwards upthread, thanks.![]()
Neither Clinton nor Edwards is the governor of SC.
As was mentioned previously in this thread:
To quote mnealtx, "*yawn*
Got anything RELEVANT to the thread? thx".
Have a tissue.
Don't like being hoist by your own petard, do you?
(Just like preachy social conservative GOP philanderers who get caught out).![]()
Thread drift happens - sucks to be you.
Well, next time you think of complaining about someone else being off-topic (which you do frequently when it suits you) I suggest you remember what you just wrote, and refrain from posting your complaint.


mnealtx 0
Quote> I already covered the STERLING examples . . .
A little late, but all in all not a bad effort. Your GOP apologist card is safe.
A little late? That was on page 2, Bill...well before your bit'o'snark.
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
mnealtx 0
QuoteQuoteThread drift happens - sucks to be you.
Well, next time you think of complaining about someone else being off-topic (which you do frequently when it suits you) I suggest you remember what you just wrote, and refrain from posting your complaint.![]()
Yeah, about that - if you TRULY wanted an answer to the question posed in your title, you probably had that on post 3.
There is a large difference between a response to the FIRST off-topic post (mine to penniless) and a response to a thread drift that has gone on for a couple pages (yours to me).
So, yes - thread drift happens, and it still sucks to be you.
Have a tissue.
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
billvon 3,120
True, it just wasn't up to your usual "DDIF in under 10 minutes" standards.
mnealtx 0
Quote
So you STILL don't have anything relevant to the thread. OK.
Should have thought of that before YOU joined in the thread drift (which started with post 9, btw - your participation in the drift was post 34), don't you think?
Still sucks to be you....but keep making yourself look as silly as you want, I'm quite enjoying it.
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
QuoteQuote
So you STILL don't have anything relevant to the thread. OK.
Should have thought of that before YOU joined in the thread drift (which started with post 9, btw - your participation in the drift was post 34), don't you think?
Still sucks to be you....but keep making yourself look as silly as you want, I'm quite enjoying it.
If the others had as long a record of whining about distractions as you have, I'd point out their hypocrisy too.

mnealtx 0
QuoteQuoteQuote
So you STILL don't have anything relevant to the thread. OK.
Should have thought of that before YOU joined in the thread drift (which started with post 9, btw - your participation in the drift was post 34), don't you think?
Still sucks to be you....but keep making yourself look as silly as you want, I'm quite enjoying it.
If the others had as long a record of whining about distractions as you have, I'd point out their hypocrisy too.![]()
Use of relevant / SC posts:
Mnealtx: 47 /9873 - 0.47%
Jerryzflies: 11/691 - 1.6%
Looks like your whine ratio is 3 times mine....
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote
So you STILL don't have anything relevant to the thread. OK.
Should have thought of that before YOU joined in the thread drift (which started with post 9, btw - your participation in the drift was post 34), don't you think?
Still sucks to be you....but keep making yourself look as silly as you want, I'm quite enjoying it.
If the others had as long a record of whining about distractions as you have, I'd point out their hypocrisy too.![]()
Use of relevant / SC posts:
Mnealtx: 47 /9873 - 0.47%
Jerryzflies: 11/691 - 1.6%
Looks like your whine ratio is 3 times mine....
So you are a post-whore.
You are still guilty of criticizing others for the behavior you exhibit yourself.
mnealtx 0
QuoteSo you are a post-whore.
So what? Is this another one of those brilliant statements that you somehow think is connected to the thread?
QuoteYou are still guilty of criticizing others for the behavior you exhibit yourself.
I point out how Democrats do the same thing they critize Republicans for. I also participate in threads both before and after thread drift happens.
In this case, the thread had already drifted to the adultery aspect by the time I responded. Making a counter-jab about Dem adultery and those who excuse it WAS in line responding to a post about Rep adultery and accusations of excusing it.
So, yet again...you're wrong.
Have a nice day, now.
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
QuoteYou are still guilty of criticizing others for the behavior you exhibit yourself.
Emphasis mine, since apparently you continue to miss the point by a mile.
BTW the hypocrite Sanford (who also condemned others for behavior he exhibits himself) has admitted to more indiscretions today. Par for the GOP course.
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/30/AR2009063001990.html
mnealtx 0
QuoteBTW the hypocrite Sanford (who also condemned others for behavior he exhibits himself) has admitted to more indiscretions today. Par for the GOP course.
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/30/AR2009063001990.html
And par for the Democrat course to denigrate it when it's a Republican while excusing it from their own.
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
billvon 3,120
>
>it.
Fixed that.
mnealtx 0
I know - maybe you can come up with ANOTHER flowchart from dkos or du to tell me what I REALLY mean.
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
QuoteQuoteBTW the hypocrite Sanford (who also condemned others for behavior he exhibits himself) has admitted to more indiscretions today. Par for the GOP course.
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/30/AR2009063001990.html
And par for the Democrat course to denigrate it when it's a Republican while excusing it from their own.
Please list the Dems who loudly and self-righteously proclaim "family values" while hiking the Appalachian Trail in South America.
If you can, you'll have a point.
mnealtx 0
QuoteQuoteQuoteBTW the hypocrite Sanford (who also condemned others for behavior he exhibits himself) has admitted to more indiscretions today. Par for the GOP course.
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/30/AR2009063001990.html
And par for the Democrat course to denigrate it when it's a Republican while excusing it from their own.
Please list the Dems who loudly and self-righteously proclaim "family values" while hiking the Appalachian Trail in South America.
If you can, you'll have a point.
Nice impossible qualifier you stipulate there, (You can decide if it's the part about Dems having values or the part about the Appalachian Trail), but I think we'll ignore it for a moment.
Frankly, I'm fed up with politicians in Washington lecturing the rest of us about family values. Our families have values. But our government doesn’t.
BILL CLINTON, speech at Democratic National Convention, July 16, 1992
Well, he certainly proved THAT true, didn't he?
"Both my parents were critically important in how I emerged, the values they taught me. - Eliot Spitzer
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
billvon 3,120
Yes, you have a good point - at least on that topic, he's not a hypocrite.
mnealtx 0
Quote>Well, he certainly proved THAT true, didn't he?
Yes, you have a good point - at least on that topic, he's not a hypocrite.
Yes, you're correct - I can't find any quotes where Clinton said he had any values.
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
QuoteQuote>Well, he certainly proved THAT true, didn't he?
Yes, you have a good point - at least on that topic, he's not a hypocrite.
Yes, you're correct - I can't find any quotes where Clinton said he had any values.
Did you finally buy a dictionary?
mnealtx 0
QuoteQuoteQuote>Well, he certainly proved THAT true, didn't he?
Yes, you have a good point - at least on that topic, he's not a hypocrite.
Yes, you're correct - I can't find any quotes where Clinton said he had any values.
Did you finally buy a dictionary?
I've always had one handy... why, what word do you need me to tell you the definition of?
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote>Well, he certainly proved THAT true, didn't he?
Yes, you have a good point - at least on that topic, he's not a hypocrite.
Yes, you're correct - I can't find any quotes where Clinton said he had any values.
Did you finally buy a dictionary?
I've always had one handy... reply]
Why didn't you use it to look up "hypocrite" and "straw man" then, since these words seem to give you a lot of trouble?
A little late, but all in all not a bad effort. Your GOP apologist card is safe.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites