quade 4 #1 May 15, 2009 Why yes! It's the yearbook that's at fault. It certainly can't be the girl. http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2009/05/14/dnt.yearbook.private.parts.wtspquade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #2 May 15, 2009 Next is the police arresting everyone in possession of the yearbook for possession of child porn. Then comes charges against the yearbook staff and yearbook publisher for production of child porn. They will all be registered sex offenders. Of course, when I worked yearbook we examined every photo to make sure nothing potentially embarrasing like that would make it through. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #3 May 15, 2009 QuoteOf course, when I worked yearbook we examined every photo to make sure nothing potentially embarrasing like that would make it through. Riiight! What's the cut off age for kiddie porn as opposed to just underage porn?quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #4 May 15, 2009 Traci Lords wa smart enough to make one porn movie after her 18th birthday and had all rights to it. Everything else was off the shelves and she made a truckload. 18. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NWFlyer 2 #5 May 15, 2009 This experience apparently taught her nothing about how to sit, at least based on the video. "There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." -P.J. O'Rourke Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1969912 0 #6 May 15, 2009 Her mom might suggest to her that wearing panties is a good idea. When I first heard about this on the radio, I thought I'd like to see the picture. But not after seeing the news video. She's a bit heavy - it probably looks like a gutted salmon. "Once we got to the point where twenty/something's needed a place on the corner that changed the oil in their cars we were doomed . . ." -NickDG Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #7 May 15, 2009 Quote18. But aren't there greater issues below a certain limit? I seem to recall it being 12 or 13.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #8 May 15, 2009 That has to do with a different crime - contact with the child. There is a sliding scale of criminal punishment that has to do with the age of the child and the age of the alleged offender (in Cali). Child porn, I believe, is strict liability. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billeisele 130 #9 May 17, 2009 so they are arguing about - is it a shadow or not for some Pottery Club would be embarrassing enoughGive one city to the thugs so they can all live together. I vote for Chicago where they have strict gun laws. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
riddler 0 #10 May 19, 2009 Quoteis it a shadow or not More importantly, who at the school is in charge of staring at the photo with a magnifying glass for hours trying to figure it out? At my high school, we had a kinda perverted Vice Principle that would definitely volunteer for the job. Thank God, today, we have the Internet, so we can all judge for ourselves. The photo is available on-line. I will not post a link to it, because I feel it crosses the line on the subject of pedophilia. But I will post a pic of the girl and her mom sharing a bong: http://www.blippitt.com/sickles-yearbook-photo-girl-smokes-weed-with-mom-photosTrapped on the surface of a sphere. XKCD Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites