jerryzflies 0 #101 April 13, 2009 QuoteQuote Your fallacy this time is to suggest that because a remedy isn't perfect, it has no beneficial effect at all. And your repeated fallacy is to ignore the costs of a remedy, as well as an inability to even define what the remedy would entail. Your error is not knowing the meaning of "fallacy".If you can't fix it with a hammer, the problem's electrical. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #102 April 13, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuote Your fallacy this time is to suggest that because a remedy isn't perfect, it has no beneficial effect at all. And your repeated fallacy is to ignore the costs of a remedy, as well as an inability to even define what the remedy would entail. Your error is not knowing the meaning of "fallacy". I know you are, but what am I? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
carmenc 0 #103 April 18, 2009 And another nutter with a gun: www.presstelegram.com/news/ci_12170353 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #104 April 18, 2009 QuoteAnd another nutter with a gun: www.presstelegram.com/news/ci_12170353 What law would you pass that you think would stop a murder-suicide? The shooter apparently wasn't a "nut" until that day. He was a long-time reliable employee, and stable family man, with no history of violence, and well-liked by everyone. So do you think that we should consider EVERYONE a potential dangerous nut, and structure our society based upon that philosophy? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
