lawrocket 3 #1 March 5, 2009 http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20090303/wl_csm/outwotaxes So U2 has relocated its business entity to the Netherlands to capitalize on a lower tax rate. For that, they are alleged to be bad. I say, "Good on them." Let them keep their money - or as much as possible. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryzflies 0 #2 March 5, 2009 Quotehttp://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20090303/wl_csm/outwotaxes So U2 has relocated its business entity to the Netherlands to capitalize on a lower tax rate. For that, they are alleged to be bad. I say, "Good on them." Let them keep their money - or as much as possible. How do you feel about the 50,000 wealthy Americans who stashed their cash in secret Swiss bank accounts?If you can't fix it with a hammer, the problem's electrical. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #3 March 5, 2009 They need only make friends with the Obama cabinet and all will be forgiven........ But, I do agree with you "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #4 March 5, 2009 QuoteQuotehttp://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20090303/wl_csm/outwotaxes So U2 has relocated its business entity to the Netherlands to capitalize on a lower tax rate. For that, they are alleged to be bad. I say, "Good on them." Let them keep their money - or as much as possible. How do you feel about the 50,000 wealthy Americans who stashed their cash in secret Swiss bank accounts? Good for them too. If you support Obama and his cabinet you have little you can honestly say against this."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1969912 0 #5 March 5, 2009 Yes, good on them. Didn't the Beatles (or some other band(s)) move their operation to the US at one time for the same reason? "Once we got to the point where twenty/something's needed a place on the corner that changed the oil in their cars we were doomed . . ." -NickDG Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #6 March 5, 2009 Yep. Lennon came here for tax reasons. He made a lot of money singing about communism. But hed be damned if he was gonna pay high taxes. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #7 March 5, 2009 Quote Yep. Lennon came here for tax reasons. He made a lot of money singing about communism. But hed be damned if he was gonna pay high taxes. But in the end, moving here turned out pretty bad for him."There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1969912 0 #8 March 5, 2009 Quote Quote Yep. Lennon came here for tax reasons. He made a lot of money singing about communism. But hed be damned if he was gonna pay high taxes. But in the end, moving here turned out pretty bad for him. He'll never make that mistake again. "Once we got to the point where twenty/something's needed a place on the corner that changed the oil in their cars we were doomed . . ." -NickDG Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #9 March 5, 2009 Yep. Dodging taxes? He got Instant Karma... My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airdvr 210 #10 March 5, 2009 Who cares if they don't play in Texas?Please don't dent the planet. Destinations by Roxanne Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andrewwhyte 1 #11 March 5, 2009 QuoteQuotehttp://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20090303/wl_csm/outwotaxes So U2 has relocated its business entity to the Netherlands to capitalize on a lower tax rate. For that, they are alleged to be bad. I say, "Good on them." Let them keep their money - or as much as possible. How do you feel about the 50,000 wealthy Americans who stashed their cash in secret Swiss bank accounts? There is a big difference between choosing to earn your future earnings in a lower tax environment, and choosing to remain and and then hiding your income. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ZigZagMarquis 9 #12 March 5, 2009 This is yet another example of why it is liberals are all for higher taxes... they don't pay em! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #13 March 5, 2009 QuoteQuotehttp://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20090303/wl_csm/outwotaxes So U2 has relocated its business entity to the Netherlands to capitalize on a lower tax rate. For that, they are alleged to be bad. I say, "Good on them." Let them keep their money - or as much as possible. How do you feel about the 50,000 wealthy Americans who stashed their cash in secret Swiss bank accounts? The same way I feel about any person seeking to protect his or her property. Why is government taking the money such a moral good thing. "Taking someone else's money" is, as a rule, bad. Anyone else does it and it's called "larceny." RICO covers organizations that do it. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
akarunway 1 #14 March 5, 2009 Quotehttp://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20090303/wl_csm/outwotaxes So U2 has relocated its business entity to the Netherlands to capitalize on a lower tax rate. For that, they are alleged to be bad. I say, "Good on them." Let them keep their money - or as much as possible.The Rolling Stones also. OLD NEWS. Yahoo must be desperate http://www.finfacts.com/irelandbusinessnews/publish/article_10008939.shtmlI hold it true, whate'er befall; I feel it, when I sorrow most; 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #15 March 5, 2009 My attitude is when they can make a Gibson Explorer sing the way the Edge does, they can criticize. Until then, they can bite my ass. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Broke 0 #16 March 5, 2009 Quote This is yet another example of why it is liberals are all for higher taxes... they don't pay em! Even though it is our patriotic duty to pay taxes. OUr VP says soDivot your source for all things Hillbilly. Anvil Brother 84 SCR 14192 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,098 #17 March 5, 2009 >Even though it is our patriotic duty to pay taxes. Who would have thought U2 would turn out to be republicans? Stranger and stranger. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #18 March 5, 2009 QuoteHow do you feel about the 50,000 wealthy Americans who stashed their cash in secret Swiss bank accounts? It's their property - what business of yours is it what they do with it?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #19 March 5, 2009 QuoteThere is a big difference between choosing to earn your future earnings in a lower tax environment, and choosing to remain and and then hiding your income. Hiding the income? How so?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #20 March 5, 2009 QuoteQuotehttp://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20090303/wl_csm/outwotaxes So U2 has relocated its business entity to the Netherlands to capitalize on a lower tax rate. For that, they are alleged to be bad. I say, "Good on them." Let them keep their money - or as much as possible. How do you feel about the 50,000 wealthy Americans who stashed their cash in secret Swiss bank accounts? The Americans who stashed their cash in secret Swiss accounts - also know as hiding that income - if they did it to avoid reporting that income to the IRS, were committing the Federal crime of income tax evasion. Now, whether that ought to be a crime is a separate issue to take up with Congress. But until such time the law is repealed, that conduct is a crime. And that, like it or not, is what makes it the government's business. Don't like that? - tell Congress to change the law. Relocating oneself to another jurisdiction so as to fall within the jurisdiction of its tax laws is not a crime; businesses do it all the time, and of course it's perfectly legal (at least in the US it is). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lefty 0 #21 March 6, 2009 QuoteMy attitude is when they can make a Gibson Explorer sing the way the Edge does, they can criticize. Until then, they can bite my ass. If I didn't already have my own libertarian-minded reasons for agreeing with their actions, your reason would be enough. :-)Provoking a reaction isn't the same thing as saying something meaningful. -Calvin Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
heavydude 0 #22 March 7, 2009 Better not catch them with one of those Obama "Hope" stickys on their van, bus, jet., they aint contributing. They sound like awful smart R&R people. Adam Clayton rules the Bass world ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jclalor 12 #23 March 7, 2009 Bono has done more and spent more than most celebs for good causes, good on him if he can save a few bucks that enable him to support more charities. After all is this not what Jesus would do? Just a few of his causes: 46664 ALAFA Amnesty International Charity Projects Entertainment Fund Chernobyl Children's Project International DATA Food Bank For New York City Global Fund Greenpeace Keep A Child Alive Live 8 Make Poverty History Mencap Millennium Promise Alliance Millennium Villages Mulago Positive Women’s Network MusiCares ONE Campaign (RED) The Lunchbox Fund UN Millennium Project War Child Wildlife Conservation Society Witness Zero Hunger Not to mention all the lobbying he has done to eliminate third world debt and his work with Bush to provide billions to west africa for aids medication. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #24 March 8, 2009 QuoteBono has done more and spent more than most celebs for good causes, good on him if he can save a few bucks that enable him to support more charities. What about the poor Irish government? It's not booming there like it used to. And the dollars (pounds?) he doesn't pay is money the rest of the people have to make up for. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites