0
airdvr

Where'd she get the money?

Recommended Posts

Quote

An in-vitro procedure typically costs between $8,000 and $15,000. Asked on NBC how she was able to afford the treatments, Suleman said she had saved money and used some of the more than $165,000 in disability payments she received after being injured in a 1999 riot at a state mental hospital where she worked.



source

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes it is! She got her money ($165,000.00) from a settlement in regard to an 'attack' at her then workplace where a patient turned violent. She denied taking welfare money but it was shown later... she did. She also had 'cosmetic work' done on her lips and nose so she would look more like that great American mom, Angelina Jolie. Three of her older kids have disabilities. Looks like she's after more of those California IOU's.


Chuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
From the same article...

"I'm really angry about that," Angela Suleman said of the doctor's decision to perform the procedure. "She already has six beautiful children. Why would she do this? I'm struggling to look after her six. We had to put in bunk beds, feed them in shifts and there's children's clothing piled all over the house."

Hard to believe she had the money set aside.
Please don't dent the planet.

Destinations by Roxanne

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Yes it is! She got her money ($165,000.00) from a settlement in regard to an 'attack' at her then workplace where a patient turned violent. She denied taking welfare money but it was shown later... she did. She also had 'cosmetic work' done on her lips and nose so she would look more like that great American mom, Angelina Jolie. Three of her older kids have disabilities. Looks like she's after more of those California IOU's.



I wouldn't call it welfare, but it's certainly in the vicinity of taxpayer money.

Seems more probable she was a resident at this hospital, not an employee.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Yes it is! She got her money ($165,000.00) from a settlement in regard to an 'attack' at her then workplace where a patient turned violent. She denied taking welfare money but it was shown later... she did. She also had 'cosmetic work' done on her lips and nose so she would look more like that great American mom, Angelina Jolie. Three of her older kids have disabilities. Looks like she's after more of those California IOU's.



I wouldn't call it welfare, but it's certainly in the vicinity of taxpayer money.

Seems more probable she was a resident at this hospital, not an employee.



In an interview, her mother said she was 'getting out'! She was tired of all the dirty clothes laying around the house and her haveing to watch her daughter's kids.

This may sound ugly but, I think, those kids... all 14, should be adopted out to families who can really take care of them. The woman couldn't really take care of the first six. Tax-payers should not have to take care of her kids.


Chuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I wouldn't call it welfare, but it's certainly in the vicinity of taxpayer money.



That wasn't the welfare - the food stamps she got for her kids was welfare, though. Plus, Social Security disability payments for three of the kids.

But she's going back to school so everything will be okay. :S

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/02/11/national/a152036S19.DTL&feed=rss.bayarea

For all the hand-wringing her mother does, it's obvious she's been enabling her daughter's choices for a long damn time. I can understand a mother not wanting to abandon her child or grandchildren, but not setting some boundaries on the amount of assistance you'll give an ADULT child sets them up for these types of situations. "Mom will always be there to bail me out."
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." -P.J. O'Rourke

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's amazing (though it shouldn't be) how poor the reporting has been on this. Obviously the A reporters won't have anything to do with this, but the JV ones are all over it.

One day I read claims from the mother that there isn't a dime of taxpayer money. The next I read about this injury payout, plus the food stamps and the three kids receiving SS/D. And we still see conflicting reports about whether or not there were multiple doctors involved and if they ever tried to discourage her.

And is it child abuse to have more (particularly when you have to try via medical invention, not just having fun without birth control) when it's clear that you can't handle the ones already. 6 kids, 3 disabled, is hardly the ideal candidate for IVF.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0