airdvr 210 #1 February 12, 2009 I've been wondering about Supermom Nadya. 6 kids already, on the government teat. Isn't invitro fertilization expensive?Please don't dent the planet. Destinations by Roxanne Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kbordson 8 #2 February 12, 2009 QuoteAn in-vitro procedure typically costs between $8,000 and $15,000. Asked on NBC how she was able to afford the treatments, Suleman said she had saved money and used some of the more than $165,000 in disability payments she received after being injured in a 1999 riot at a state mental hospital where she worked. source Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #3 February 12, 2009 Yes it is! She got her money ($165,000.00) from a settlement in regard to an 'attack' at her then workplace where a patient turned violent. She denied taking welfare money but it was shown later... she did. She also had 'cosmetic work' done on her lips and nose so she would look more like that great American mom, Angelina Jolie. Three of her older kids have disabilities. Looks like she's after more of those California IOU's. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airdvr 210 #4 February 12, 2009 From the same article... "I'm really angry about that," Angela Suleman said of the doctor's decision to perform the procedure. "She already has six beautiful children. Why would she do this? I'm struggling to look after her six. We had to put in bunk beds, feed them in shifts and there's children's clothing piled all over the house." Hard to believe she had the money set aside.Please don't dent the planet. Destinations by Roxanne Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #5 February 12, 2009 QuoteYes it is! She got her money ($165,000.00) from a settlement in regard to an 'attack' at her then workplace where a patient turned violent. She denied taking welfare money but it was shown later... she did. She also had 'cosmetic work' done on her lips and nose so she would look more like that great American mom, Angelina Jolie. Three of her older kids have disabilities. Looks like she's after more of those California IOU's. I wouldn't call it welfare, but it's certainly in the vicinity of taxpayer money. Seems more probable she was a resident at this hospital, not an employee. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shropshire 0 #6 February 12, 2009 Just saw on the News that she's after donations via t'internet (.)Y(.) Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #7 February 12, 2009 Quote Just saw on the News that she's after donations via t'internet the crazy thing is as transparent as she's been, it's working. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shropshire 0 #8 February 12, 2009 Certainly seems to be (.)Y(.) Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #9 February 12, 2009 QuoteQuoteYes it is! She got her money ($165,000.00) from a settlement in regard to an 'attack' at her then workplace where a patient turned violent. She denied taking welfare money but it was shown later... she did. She also had 'cosmetic work' done on her lips and nose so she would look more like that great American mom, Angelina Jolie. Three of her older kids have disabilities. Looks like she's after more of those California IOU's. I wouldn't call it welfare, but it's certainly in the vicinity of taxpayer money. Seems more probable she was a resident at this hospital, not an employee. In an interview, her mother said she was 'getting out'! She was tired of all the dirty clothes laying around the house and her haveing to watch her daughter's kids. This may sound ugly but, I think, those kids... all 14, should be adopted out to families who can really take care of them. The woman couldn't really take care of the first six. Tax-payers should not have to take care of her kids. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NWFlyer 2 #10 February 12, 2009 Quote I wouldn't call it welfare, but it's certainly in the vicinity of taxpayer money. That wasn't the welfare - the food stamps she got for her kids was welfare, though. Plus, Social Security disability payments for three of the kids. But she's going back to school so everything will be okay. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/02/11/national/a152036S19.DTL&feed=rss.bayarea For all the hand-wringing her mother does, it's obvious she's been enabling her daughter's choices for a long damn time. I can understand a mother not wanting to abandon her child or grandchildren, but not setting some boundaries on the amount of assistance you'll give an ADULT child sets them up for these types of situations. "Mom will always be there to bail me out.""There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." -P.J. O'Rourke Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #11 February 12, 2009 It's amazing (though it shouldn't be) how poor the reporting has been on this. Obviously the A reporters won't have anything to do with this, but the JV ones are all over it. One day I read claims from the mother that there isn't a dime of taxpayer money. The next I read about this injury payout, plus the food stamps and the three kids receiving SS/D. And we still see conflicting reports about whether or not there were multiple doctors involved and if they ever tried to discourage her. And is it child abuse to have more (particularly when you have to try via medical invention, not just having fun without birth control) when it's clear that you can't handle the ones already. 6 kids, 3 disabled, is hardly the ideal candidate for IVF. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
headoverheels 334 #12 February 12, 2009 Quote Just saw on the News that she's after donations via t'internet Can I make a negative donation? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shropshire 0 #13 February 12, 2009 Yeap, you get one of the kids. (.)Y(.) Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #14 February 12, 2009 On fark.com they refer to her as the "Clown Car". "There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
faulknerwn 38 #15 February 13, 2009 Especially since premature octuplets are at high risk of all sorts of future disabilities.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryzflies 0 #16 February 13, 2009 Poster Mom for abortions.If you can't fix it with a hammer, the problem's electrical. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites