mnealtx 0 #26 November 25, 2008 QuoteQuoteThey probably think that guns are a hot button issue. Judging by your response I'd say they're right. It sure is making gun sales spike.... for all of those afraid of Obama Democrats resuming their gun-ban agenda. Fixed that for you.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #27 November 25, 2008 I dont know what you had in your "fix" but it leads to interesting hallucinations...they sure do skew your perceptions in some weird ass ways. Perhaps reality will smack you down to earth one of these days.... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brains 2 #28 November 25, 2008 Replying TO you john, not AT you. Does anyone know the exact laws in DC and the metro areas? Maybe they want to know that everyone will be within compliance if/when they get a cabinet position. I am generally about as pro-gun as one can be and i do not see this question being anything out of the ordinary for a presidential cabinet position. Never look down on someone, unless they are going down on you. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #29 November 25, 2008 QuoteDoes anyone know the exact laws in DC and the metro areas? Maybe they want to know that everyone will be within compliance if/when they get a cabinet position. I am generally about as pro-gun as one can be and i do not see this question being anything out of the ordinary for a presidential cabinet position. Handgun ownership is banned in the district. So if they go live there to work for Obamer, then they'll have to leave their guns behind. And Obamer has stated that he supports the D.C. handgun ban. Therefore, he also supports disarming his employees who come to live in the district to work for him. So, getting back to the questionnaire - the purpose may be so that Obamer can warn them to leave their guns behind when they come to work for him. "No guns allowed!" He wouldn't want to have a news story about how he supports the D.C. gun ban, yet some of his cabinet appointees violate that ban by daring to own a gun. And of course, that would be really embarrassing since he claims to be in support of the 2nd Amendment. Better to head it off so it doesn't happen, so that his true feelings and hypocrisy about guns won't be revealed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
akarunway 1 #30 November 25, 2008 QuoteBTW - you do not need a license to own a shotgun.And in many states a handgun or rifle. just a background check.I hold it true, whate'er befall; I feel it, when I sorrow most; 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,173 #31 November 26, 2008 >So if they go live there to work for Obamer, then they'll have to leave >their guns behind. It also asks about housekeepers. I guess they'll have to leave their housekeepers behind! It also asks about taxes. I guess they'll have to leave their taxes behind! It also asks about husbands/wives. I guess they'll have to leave them behind! It also asks about diaries. I guess they'll have to leave their diaries behind! (Where do you get this stuff? What right winger website is that dumb?) >Better to head it off so it doesn't happen, so that his true feelings and >hypocrisy about guns won't be revealed. You should talk to your doctor about that ODS before it gets out of hand. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
akarunway 1 #32 November 26, 2008 Quote Quote Does anyone know the exact laws in DC and the metro areas? Maybe they want to know that everyone will be within compliance if/when they get a cabinet position. I am generally about as pro-gun as one can be and i do not see this question being anything out of the ordinary for a presidential cabinet position. Handgun ownership is banned in the district. So if they go live there to work for Obamer, then they'll have to leave their guns behind. And Obamer has stated that he supports the D.C. handgun ban. Therefore, he also supports disarming his employees who come to live in the district to work for him. So, getting back to the questionnaire - the purpose may be so that Obamer can warn them to leave their guns behind when they come to work for him. "No guns allowed!" He wouldn't want to have a news story about how he supports the D.C. gun ban, yet some of his cabinet appointees violate that ban by daring to own a gun. And of course, that would be really embarrassing since he claims to be in support of the 2nd Amendment. Better to head it off so it doesn't happen, so that his true feelings and hypocrisy about guns won't be revealed. I thought the SCOTUS just shot down that law. I hold it true, whate'er befall; I feel it, when I sorrow most; 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #33 November 26, 2008 QuoteSo if they go live there to work for Obamer Pssst You are doing the GOB thing again John.. http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=3399551#3399551 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TankBuster 0 #34 November 26, 2008 QuoteI thought the SCOTUS just shot down that law. They did. It will be interesting to see what the BHO administration will do. Bring back the "evil black rifle" ban, or increase taxes on guns and ammo, I think will be a huge mistake for his party. I thought they learned that lesson back in the 90s.The forecast is mostly sunny with occasional beer. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
