0
Lucky...

More Palin abuse of power..... what's new?

Recommended Posts

Quote

Fascinating interpretation of Article I of the Constitution from Palin:

"A vice president has a really great job because not only are they there to support the president's agenda, they're there like the team member, the teammate to the president. But also, they're in charge of the United States Senate, so if they want to they can really get in there with the senators and make a lot of good policy changes that will make life better for Brandon and his family and his classroom. And it's a great job and I look forward to having that job.”




What a power-drunk sick bitch. The VP just breaks ties in the Senate to my understanding, that's it. The majority leaders take care of organization of teh senate.

Here, let's have fun:

"A vice president has a really great job because not only are they there to support the president's agenda, they're there like the team member, the Joe six-pack to the president. But also, they're in charge of the United States Senate, so if they want to they can really get in there with the senators and get all Mavericky, that will make life better for Brandon and his family and his classroom with a picture of Jesus hanging on the wall. And it's a great job and I look forward to having that job.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Thanks for the reply -

I saw the entire quote more as a working with the Senate (as she said) rather than the 'bull in the china shop' 'you will respect my authoritay' scenario you describe.




Uhhhhhuh. Read the quote, typical usurpation of power by a neo-con admin.... nothing new here, just move along.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Well, let's look at a bit more of what she said for a somewhat fuller context;

Quote


But also, they're in charge of the United States Senate, so if they want to they can really get in there with the senators and make a lot of good policy changes . . . "



I really don't see how there's any other way to interpret that. It certainly seems as if she believes the VPs can, with respect to the Senate, somehow control the agenda, " . . . if they (the VPs) want . . . ."

That's simply not supported by the current rules of the Senate.




Republicans think it's still a Monarchy, just a throw-back party.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

they're in charge of the United States Senate



And your point is, what? That the President of the Senate really *isn't* a duty of the VP?



"IN CHARGE"?



Oh, relax. She simply meant that she'd be charging new clothes for all the Senators at Sak's Fifth Avenue. You have to admit, the Senate is pretty stuffy.




With all those Senators running around doing their senatory things, being all senaty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

By Constitutional title only.



And who gives a shit what that old document says.



What the US Constitution says and means has changed over time. It's meant to. In fact, provisions for doing so are written into it.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0