See the NRA ads that Obama doesn't want you to see

[JohnRich 4]

When the NRA took its warnings about Barack Obama to the airwaves, the Senator from Chicago had his lawyers issue 'cease and desist' letters to the television stations.

See what Obama doesn't want you to see - view all five NRA television ads here!

http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/node/6052

[christelsabine 1]

Quote

....
all five NRA television ads here ....
....

... obviously are made for simple minds.

dudeist skydiver # 3105

[JohnRich 4]

Quote

...obviously are made for simple minds.

But of course. It's necessary because all gun owners are stupid people, and they need messages delivered in simple terms like that.

[christelsabine 1]

Quote

But of course. It's necessary because all gun owners are stupid people, and ....

That's what you said.

Quote

.... they need messages delivered in simple terms like that.

That's what advertising experts call a "tool".

dudeist skydiver # 3105

[Andy9o8 2]

Quote

That's what advertising experts call a "tool".

What an excellent straight line.

[christelsabine 1]

Quote

Quote

That's what advertising experts call a "tool".

What an excellent straight line.

OK. Let me repeat in straight words:

JR is right.

dudeist skydiver # 3105

[marks2065 0]

Quote

When the NRA took its warnings about Barack Obama to the airwaves, the Senator from Chicago had his lawyers issue 'cease and desist' letters to the television stations.

See what Obama doesn't want you to see - view all five NRA television ads here!

http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/node/6052

to bad the left is to blind to see what is forming with this election. Obama and Biden have tryed to slowly squeeze our rights and with a poss 60 dem vote in the senate Obama will have free raine to do what he wants and we will all pay for it later by having less rights in a moore socialized country.

[normiss 892]

Hopefully not Michael Moore.
THAT'S scary.

[JohnRich 4]

Quote

Quote

But of course. It's necessary because all gun owners are stupid people, and they need messages delivered in simple terms like that.

JR is right.

That's funny. You see, I was just saying the above tongue-in-cheek to parody what you yourself we're trying to imply, without coming right out and saying it. And now you've admitted that it was indeed what you truly believe. But it's a ridiculous, bigoted statement.

You're a gun owner. What does this "stupid gun owners" belief say about your intelligence level?

If your belief is correct, then it would mean that you too are stupid. Or if you don't consider yourself to be stupid, then that disproves the belief. So, then you can just admit that you are wrong about all gun owners being stupid. Which is it?

[christelsabine 1]

Quote

....
So, then you can just admit that you are wrong about all gun owners being stupid. Which is it?

Very simple. We do not have stupid ads like the above.

Our gun owners (say: mainly hunters) are not used for political ads/issues.

Your 2nd amendment seems to be like your bible. Keep it. It's in your constitution. That's what I have to admit.

Using gun ownership for political ads like the above, nevertheless looks ridiculous.

I'd prefer a president with brain and international presence, not a shooter with a quick finger and a big mouth.

dudeist skydiver # 3105

[JohnRich 4]

Quote

Quote

So, then you can just admit that you are wrong about all gun owners being stupid. Which is it?

Very simple. We do not have stupid ads like the above. Our gun owners (say: mainly hunters) are not used for political ads/issues.

I see, so it's only American gun owners who are stupid. But not German gun owners. Got it.

Even if you consider the gun owners in those five ads stupid, how does that translate to all 80 million American gun owners also being stupid? Do those five adequately represent everyone?

Maybe you don't have gun owners in political ads over there, because you've already lost all the gun control battles, and have nothing left to lose.

How about when people from other advocacy groups make political ads - does that make them stupid too?

What is it about political ads that you think automatically makes them stupid?

[christelsabine 1]

Quote

Quote

Quote

So, then you can just admit that you are wrong about all gun owners being stupid. Which is it?

Very simple. We do not have stupid ads like the above. Our gun owners (say: mainly hunters) are not used for political ads/issues.

1)I see, so it's only American gun owners who are stupid. But not German gun owners. Got it.

2)Maybe you don't have gun owners in political ads over there, because you've already lost all the gun control battles, and have nothing left to lose.

3)How about when people from other advocacy groups make political ads - does that make them stupid too?

4)What is it about political ads that you think automatically makes them stupid?

1)
If you want to see it like that, it's your opinion, I did not mean it.

2)
To lose what? We're free in every directon. We don't want our fellow citizens to be armed.

3)
Don't let me doubt your intelligence. Ads - if stupid or not - always are customized to reach the located groups. And it's not the agency behind that ads which is stupid.

4)
What?

JR, you really should take some time to travel abroad. It would widen your horizon. There are countries which work w/o armed population. Promised.

dudeist skydiver # 3105

[rehmwa 2]

Quote

I'd prefer a president with brain and international presence, not a shooter with a quick finger and a big mouth.

How about two half presidents?

Clinton had a quick finger and Obama has a big mouth.

...
Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

[christelsabine 1]

Quote

Quote

I'd prefer a president with brain and international presence, not a shooter with a quick finger and a big mouth.

How about two half presidents?

Clinton had a quick finger and Obama has a big mouth.

Clinton? Really? I thought he only had a big cigar.

Obama: Has a good speech. Comes along genuine.

2 presidents, that's not a bad idea and surely would be of great benefit for your country.

Who might that be?

dudeist skydiver # 3105

[skybill 22]

Hi sab,

I like the part where you say "You're free in every direction?? and you don't want your fellow citizens to be armed!!

Dig it,
"An Armed man is a Citizen"
"An UnArmed man is a SUBJECT!!!!!!!"
Got That??

BTW, I've traveled 1/2 way around the world twice in both directions and I'm not impressed!

SCR-2034, SCS-680

III%,
Deli-out

[JohnRich 4]

Quote

JR, you really should take some time to travel abroad. It would widen your horizon.

You should really refrain from speaking about things you don't know anything about.

[rhys 0]

Quote

:
In Reply To
JR, you really should take some time to travel abroad. It would widen your horizon.

You should really refrain from speaking about things you don't know anything about.

are you trying to imply that you are well travelled and have a broad horizon? texas does have a broad horizon but that is not what she is talking about!



You really are obsessed, think you may need some counciling john before you blow your, or somebody elses brains out.

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, then the world will see peace." - 'Jimi' Hendrix

[airdvr 210]

To lose what? We're free in every directon. We don't want our fellow citizens to be armed.

I laughed when I read this. What do the schools in Germany teach you about WWII?

JR, you really should take some time to travel abroad. It would widen your horizon. There are countries which work w/o armed population. Promised.

[billvon 3,108]

Last warning, Rhys. Speak to the subject, don't attack the person.

[christelsabine 1]

Quote

Quote

JR, you really should take some time to travel abroad. It would widen your horizon.

You should really refrain from speaking about things you don't know anything about.

Same back to you, JR. Perhaps one day, you'll have the chance to leave your corral. You will learn a lot. Like I did.

dudeist skydiver # 3105

[JohnRich 4]

Quote

Quote

Quote

JR, you really should take some time to travel abroad. It would widen your horizon.

You should really refrain from speaking about things you don't know anything about.

Same back to you, JR. Perhaps one day, you'll have the chance to leave your corral.

You don't know me. You don't know how much I've traveled. You don't know my life experiences.

It is ludicrous for you to presume that I'm not well-traveled, worldly-experienced or well-educated, without knowing anything at all about me.

All you do when you make such presumptuous pronouncements is to demonstrate your own inability to be fair and logical.

That doesn't hurt me or my arguments at all. It hurts yours. It sounds egotistical and arrogant. You ought to step down off your high horse and stick to facts that you actually know. And if you don't know them, don't make 'em up.

[JohnRich 4]

Quote

You really are obsessed, think you may need some counciling john before you blow your, or somebody elses brains out.

Well, since the moderator didn't see fit to remove this personal attack, I guess I'll go ahead and make a comment upon it.

That statement takes some gall, coming from you. You're the one here who thinks the following:

- The founding fathers were pot-heads.
- America hasn't survived as a country.
- The U.S. is "United states socialist republic".
- There's a conspiracy by the alcohol industry and government to keep marijuana illegal.
- There's a government conspiracy to suppress the truth about hemp.
- Millions of Americans don't have decent water to drink or food to eat.
- George Bush ordered the CIA to blow up the WTC on 9/11/01.

And all that is just in the last 10 days.

So I'll let the readers decide for themselves which of the two of us they think is crazy.

Oh, and don't worry, just because I own guns doesn't mean that I want to blow someone's brains out. I hope that this revelation will help you sleep easy tonight.

[billvon 3,108]

Since the last 10 posts have been basically nothing but gradually escalating attacks, I'm locking this thread.

Guys, your candidate may be winning, your candidate may be losing. That does not give you the right to attack other people.