rushmc 23 #1 October 3, 2008 http://governor.mo.gov/cgi-bin/coranto/viewnews.cgi?id=EkkkVFulkpOzXqGMaj&style=Default+News+Style&tmpl=newsitem http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=36590 http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=28831 http://svforbes.newsvine.com/_news/2008/08/28/1796297-obama-campaign-confronts-wgn-radio-regarding-on-air-obama-critic"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #2 October 3, 2008 It's all okay - he respects everyone's 1st Amendment rights, he's not going to take away anyone's freedom of speech. But at the same time, he's in favor of allowing people to restrict free speech where necessary for the greater public good. (Parroting the standard Obama response to everything.) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #3 October 3, 2008 Quotefor the greater public good.Quote That's 'where nobody brings up my association with Bill Ayers or ACORN or Tony Rezko or Fannie/Freddie or my record on gun control', right?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites downwardspiral 0 #4 October 3, 2008 Holy fucking shit. That is scary. This is our future President. www.FourWheelerHB.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #5 October 3, 2008 Quote Holy fucking shit. That is scary. This is our future President. Can one even imagine if this was Bush 4 years ago?And now the dead silence from his supports"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites DanG 1 #6 October 3, 2008 Um, the Obama campaign wrote letters to TV stations asking them to take what they considered to be misleading ads off the air. What is wrong with that? It's pretty much standard practice. Do you really think that the McCain campaign has not written cease and desist letters? This is such a tempest in a teapot that I can't believe I'm responding. And nice choice of sources. All pieces you quoted are political opinion pieces, not investigative news. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #7 October 3, 2008 QuoteUm, the Obama campaign wrote letters to TV stations asking them to take what they considered to be misleading ads off the air. What is wrong with that? It's pretty much standard practice. Do you really think that the McCain campaign has not written cease and desist letters? This is such a tempest in a teapot that I can't believe I'm responding. And nice choice of sources. All pieces you quoted are political opinion pieces, not investigative news. I have no problem is that is what they did, but they didnt. And where did I say these were other than opinion. Did you read any of this?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites funjumper101 15 #8 October 3, 2008 Quotehttp://governor.mo.gov/cgi-bin/coranto/viewnews.cgi?id=EkkkVFulkpOzXqGMaj&style=Default+News+Style&tmpl=newsitem http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=36590 http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=28831 http://svforbes.newsvine.com/_news/2008/08/28/1796297-obama-campaign-confronts-wgn-radio-regarding-on-air-obama-critic Righties sure do hate it when they are held accountable, don't they? Here is a clue - you can't knowingly broadcast lies and untruths on the public airwaves. Obama's team is simply holding the radio and TV stations accountable for the content of what they broadcast. If they have truthful advertisments, they don't have anything to worry about. If it a load of the usual right wing lies and no-truths, and they broadcast after they have been told that the content is crap, they'll be held accountable. What is the problem that righties have with accountability and following the law? Why is it bad for broadcasters to be held to the contracts they agreed to when they lease the use of the public airwaves? Marc, you never answered my questions in another thread about your travel experience. I asked if you had ever traveled around the states or if you had traveled internationally. Have you traveled? How far? As a civilian or in the military? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites DanG 1 #9 October 3, 2008 I read it all. Did you? Nowhere does it say they did anything past writing letters. The rest is hyperbole and conjecture. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #10 October 4, 2008 QuoteAs a civilian or in the military? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA yeah right..... BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Capt.Slog 0 #11 October 4, 2008 Have you ever though about getting your "news" from a non partisan source? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #12 October 4, 2008 Quote Have you ever though about getting your "news" from a non partisan source? DUDE.. you dont really expect these guys to get news from any source not willing to tell them EXACTLY what they want to hear do you????The sad part is.. they really BELIEVE this is really fair and balanced and anything else is just left wing MSM.. or as this person in particular has picked up from Lush Rimjob... the Drive By Media Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #13 October 4, 2008 Quote Have you ever though about getting your "news" from a non partisan source? NOw this is dam funnyTalk about a 10 for 10 Well I guess we all know now that YOU know all the "non parisan" sources.WFJ "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Capt.Slog 0 #14 October 4, 2008 Quote Quote Have you ever though about getting your "news" from a non partisan source? NOw this is dam funnyTalk about a 10 for 10 Well I guess we all know now that YOU know all the "non parisan" sources.WFJ I believe I've only ever quoted the White House's own web site, the CIA factbook, and the Washington Post in my posts. are you saying that's not "fair and balanced"? Yuor "pattern" of posting from far right wing news sources and blogs doesn't make you a very impartial judge, now does it? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #15 October 4, 2008 Quote Quote Quote Have you ever though about getting your "news" from a non partisan source? NOw this is dam funnyTalk about a 10 for 10 Well I guess we all know now that YOU know all the "non parisan" sources.WFJ I believe I've only ever quoted the White House's own web site, the CIA factbook, and the Washington Post in my posts. are you saying that's not "fair and balanced"? Yuor "pattern" of posting from far right wing news sources and blogs doesn't make you a very impartial judge, now does it? OK, we will give it to you. You are the most impartial in the siteBased on what you have saidnot on the sites you say to post aboutOh pleasestop it"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #16 October 5, 2008 QuoteUm, the Obama campaign wrote letters to TV stations asking them to take what they considered to be misleading ads off the air. What is wrong with that? It's pretty much standard practice. Do you really think that the McCain campaign has not written cease and desist letters? This is such a tempest in a teapot that I can't believe I'm responding. And nice choice of sources. All pieces you quoted are political opinion pieces, not investigative news. I'd suggest doing a little more digging, but I know you won't. In point of fact, Obama went to the DOJ to try to shut down the ads (not the NRA ads, but others). The letters that were sent to the stations made oblique references to FCC licensing being in jeopardy. (Let's see, where have we seen that before? Oh yes, when the Dems went after stations showing "The Path to 9/11").Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #17 October 5, 2008 QuoteRighties sure do hate it when they are held accountable, don't they? Here is a clue - you can't knowingly broadcast lies and untruths on the public airwaves. News flash for ya there, Chief - the NRA ads AREN'T lies and untruths - Obama's team is dancing on their crank with golf shoes on with this one. QuoteObama's team is simply holding the radio and TV stations accountable for the content of what they broadcast. If they have truthful advertisments, they don't have anything to worry about. And they don't anything to worry about on that score. QuoteIf it a load of the usual right wing lies and no-truths, and they broadcast after they have been told that the content is crap, they'll be held accountable. Ah... so when Obama's campaign tells them it's wrong, they should pull it? Yeah, ok - when do the stories about rape kits and forced non-abortions get pulled from the OTHER new sites, then? QuoteWhat is the problem that righties have with accountability and following the law? Why is it bad for broadcasters to be held to the contracts they agreed to when they lease the use of the public airwaves? Funny you should say that, when it's the DEMS that keep getting their asses handed to them in that regard - trying to keep stations from providing info, that is. QuoteMarc, you never answered my questions in another thread about your travel experience. I asked if you had ever traveled around the states or if you had traveled internationally. Have you traveled? How far? As a civilian or in the military? What does that have to do with the Dems trying (yet again) to shut down dissenting news stations?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
downwardspiral 0 #4 October 3, 2008 Holy fucking shit. That is scary. This is our future President. www.FourWheelerHB.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #5 October 3, 2008 Quote Holy fucking shit. That is scary. This is our future President. Can one even imagine if this was Bush 4 years ago?And now the dead silence from his supports"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #6 October 3, 2008 Um, the Obama campaign wrote letters to TV stations asking them to take what they considered to be misleading ads off the air. What is wrong with that? It's pretty much standard practice. Do you really think that the McCain campaign has not written cease and desist letters? This is such a tempest in a teapot that I can't believe I'm responding. And nice choice of sources. All pieces you quoted are political opinion pieces, not investigative news. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #7 October 3, 2008 QuoteUm, the Obama campaign wrote letters to TV stations asking them to take what they considered to be misleading ads off the air. What is wrong with that? It's pretty much standard practice. Do you really think that the McCain campaign has not written cease and desist letters? This is such a tempest in a teapot that I can't believe I'm responding. And nice choice of sources. All pieces you quoted are political opinion pieces, not investigative news. I have no problem is that is what they did, but they didnt. And where did I say these were other than opinion. Did you read any of this?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
funjumper101 15 #8 October 3, 2008 Quotehttp://governor.mo.gov/cgi-bin/coranto/viewnews.cgi?id=EkkkVFulkpOzXqGMaj&style=Default+News+Style&tmpl=newsitem http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=36590 http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=28831 http://svforbes.newsvine.com/_news/2008/08/28/1796297-obama-campaign-confronts-wgn-radio-regarding-on-air-obama-critic Righties sure do hate it when they are held accountable, don't they? Here is a clue - you can't knowingly broadcast lies and untruths on the public airwaves. Obama's team is simply holding the radio and TV stations accountable for the content of what they broadcast. If they have truthful advertisments, they don't have anything to worry about. If it a load of the usual right wing lies and no-truths, and they broadcast after they have been told that the content is crap, they'll be held accountable. What is the problem that righties have with accountability and following the law? Why is it bad for broadcasters to be held to the contracts they agreed to when they lease the use of the public airwaves? Marc, you never answered my questions in another thread about your travel experience. I asked if you had ever traveled around the states or if you had traveled internationally. Have you traveled? How far? As a civilian or in the military? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #9 October 3, 2008 I read it all. Did you? Nowhere does it say they did anything past writing letters. The rest is hyperbole and conjecture. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #10 October 4, 2008 QuoteAs a civilian or in the military? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA yeah right..... BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Capt.Slog 0 #11 October 4, 2008 Have you ever though about getting your "news" from a non partisan source? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #12 October 4, 2008 Quote Have you ever though about getting your "news" from a non partisan source? DUDE.. you dont really expect these guys to get news from any source not willing to tell them EXACTLY what they want to hear do you????The sad part is.. they really BELIEVE this is really fair and balanced and anything else is just left wing MSM.. or as this person in particular has picked up from Lush Rimjob... the Drive By Media Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #13 October 4, 2008 Quote Have you ever though about getting your "news" from a non partisan source? NOw this is dam funnyTalk about a 10 for 10 Well I guess we all know now that YOU know all the "non parisan" sources.WFJ "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Capt.Slog 0 #14 October 4, 2008 Quote Quote Have you ever though about getting your "news" from a non partisan source? NOw this is dam funnyTalk about a 10 for 10 Well I guess we all know now that YOU know all the "non parisan" sources.WFJ I believe I've only ever quoted the White House's own web site, the CIA factbook, and the Washington Post in my posts. are you saying that's not "fair and balanced"? Yuor "pattern" of posting from far right wing news sources and blogs doesn't make you a very impartial judge, now does it? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #15 October 4, 2008 Quote Quote Quote Have you ever though about getting your "news" from a non partisan source? NOw this is dam funnyTalk about a 10 for 10 Well I guess we all know now that YOU know all the "non parisan" sources.WFJ I believe I've only ever quoted the White House's own web site, the CIA factbook, and the Washington Post in my posts. are you saying that's not "fair and balanced"? Yuor "pattern" of posting from far right wing news sources and blogs doesn't make you a very impartial judge, now does it? OK, we will give it to you. You are the most impartial in the siteBased on what you have saidnot on the sites you say to post aboutOh pleasestop it"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #16 October 5, 2008 QuoteUm, the Obama campaign wrote letters to TV stations asking them to take what they considered to be misleading ads off the air. What is wrong with that? It's pretty much standard practice. Do you really think that the McCain campaign has not written cease and desist letters? This is such a tempest in a teapot that I can't believe I'm responding. And nice choice of sources. All pieces you quoted are political opinion pieces, not investigative news. I'd suggest doing a little more digging, but I know you won't. In point of fact, Obama went to the DOJ to try to shut down the ads (not the NRA ads, but others). The letters that were sent to the stations made oblique references to FCC licensing being in jeopardy. (Let's see, where have we seen that before? Oh yes, when the Dems went after stations showing "The Path to 9/11").Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #17 October 5, 2008 QuoteRighties sure do hate it when they are held accountable, don't they? Here is a clue - you can't knowingly broadcast lies and untruths on the public airwaves. News flash for ya there, Chief - the NRA ads AREN'T lies and untruths - Obama's team is dancing on their crank with golf shoes on with this one. QuoteObama's team is simply holding the radio and TV stations accountable for the content of what they broadcast. If they have truthful advertisments, they don't have anything to worry about. And they don't anything to worry about on that score. QuoteIf it a load of the usual right wing lies and no-truths, and they broadcast after they have been told that the content is crap, they'll be held accountable. Ah... so when Obama's campaign tells them it's wrong, they should pull it? Yeah, ok - when do the stories about rape kits and forced non-abortions get pulled from the OTHER new sites, then? QuoteWhat is the problem that righties have with accountability and following the law? Why is it bad for broadcasters to be held to the contracts they agreed to when they lease the use of the public airwaves? Funny you should say that, when it's the DEMS that keep getting their asses handed to them in that regard - trying to keep stations from providing info, that is. QuoteMarc, you never answered my questions in another thread about your travel experience. I asked if you had ever traveled around the states or if you had traveled internationally. Have you traveled? How far? As a civilian or in the military? What does that have to do with the Dems trying (yet again) to shut down dissenting news stations?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
