airdvr 210 #1 October 1, 2008 About time. Once again another Dem on the wrong side of history. Marine Names Murtha in Defamation Suit Congressman Discussed Killings Involving Serviceman's Squad in Haditha, Iraq http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/01/AR2006080101345.html By Josh White Washington Post Staff Writer Wednesday, August 2, 2006; Page A05 A Marine Corps staff sergeant who led the squad accused of killing two dozen civilians in Haditha, Iraq, will file a lawsuit today in federal court in Washington claiming that Rep. John P. Murtha (D-Pa.) defamed him when the congressman made public comments about the incident earlier this year. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXPw5Ragb4U&feature=related Gen. clears 2 Marines in Hadithah deaths http://www.navytimes.com/news/2007/08/marine_sharratt_070809/ By Gidget Fuentes - Staff writer Posted : Sunday Aug 12, 2007 8:46:37 EDT OCEANSIDE, Calif. — A top Marine commander dropped all charges Thursday against a lance corporal charged with the 2005 murder of Iraqis in Hadithah. Lt. Gen. Jim Mattis, head of Marine Corps Forces-Central Command, made his decision to dismiss all charges against Lance Cpl. Justin Sharratt after meeting with Sharratt and his attorneys, and cited “this morally bruising environment” in his decision. Mattis also dismissed charges on Thursday against Capt. Randy Stone, a lawyer who was serving as the infantry battalion’s staff judge advocate at the time of the Hadithah incident.Please don't dent the planet. Destinations by Roxanne Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,156 #2 October 1, 2008 QuoteAbout time. Once again another Dem on the wrong side of history. Marine Names Murtha in Defamation Suit Congressman Discussed Killings Involving Serviceman's Squad in Haditha, Iraq http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/01/AR2006080101345.html By Josh White Washington Post Staff Writer Wednesday, August 2, 2006; About time? Did you read the date on the article? It's over 2 years old. Been saving it for a slow news day?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airdvr 210 #3 October 1, 2008 You're correct Professor. This better? Murtha sued over remarks BY MIKE FAHER The Tribune-Democrat September 26, 2008 12:06 am http://www.tribune-democrat.com/local/local_story_270000717.html/resources_printstory — In May 2006, six months after 24 people were killed in a small Iraqi town, U.S. Rep. John Murtha made a startling accusation. American soldiers, he contended, had killed innocent civilians “in cold blood.” Now, less than six weeks before the longtime Johnstown Democrat is up for re-election, a Marine involved in the now-infamous Haditha incident is suing Murtha for slander. Justin Sharratt of Canonsburg, Washington County, left the Marine Corps last year. But he claims Murtha’s statements have caused “permanent, irreversible damage to his reputation.” “What Murtha did is outrageous, and I am seeking punitive damages,” said Noah Geary, a Pittsburgh attorney representing Sharratt. Sorry about the timeline problem. Either way, Murtha is still a POS.Please don't dent the planet. Destinations by Roxanne Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AWL71 0 #4 October 1, 2008 QuoteYou're correct Professor. This better? Murtha sued over remarks BY MIKE FAHER The Tribune-Democrat September 26, 2008 12:06 am http://www.tribune-democrat.com/local/local_story_270000717.html/resources_printstory — In May 2006, six months after 24 people were killed in a small Iraqi town, U.S. Rep. John Murtha made a startling accusation. American soldiers, he contended, had killed innocent civilians “in cold blood.” Now, less than six weeks before the longtime Johnstown Democrat is up for re-election, a Marine involved in the now-infamous Haditha incident is suing Murtha for slander. Justin Sharratt of Canonsburg, Washington County, left the Marine Corps last year. But he claims Murtha’s statements have caused “permanent, irreversible damage to his reputation.” “What Murtha did is outrageous, and I am seeking punitive damages,” said Noah Geary, a Pittsburgh attorney representing Sharratt. Sorry about the timeline problem. Either way, Murtha is still a POS. I 2nd the motion. Murtha is a POS and I hope he loses his re-election bid.The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,156 #5 October 1, 2008 Quote Sorry about the timeline problem. Either way, Murtha is still a POS. I'm sure you're right. POS is the only way to describe a guy who rises through the ranks of the US Marine Corps to full Colonel, and is awarded a Bronze Star and 2 Purple Hearts for his service in Vietnam. I bet you have a much better record of service.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Trent 0 #6 October 1, 2008 Unfortunately someone's past doesn't always carry over into the present. If a war hero killed a child, he'd be a POS and it'd be sad that someone who WAS a hero did such things. It is sad that someone who served honorably turned around later in life to defame soldiers currently serving. Someone wrongfully accusing people of mass murders is a POS. Murtha wrongly accused people of mass murder. Do you disagree? Even more amazing is that people on the left accuse McCain of being too old to have his wits about him, but readily believe the rantings of someone 4 years older, like Murtha? Your double standard is ridiculous and obvious.Oh, hello again! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
martlet 0 #7 October 1, 2008 Amen. I hope these Marines cash in. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMedVWUsSFU Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #8 October 1, 2008 Quote Quote Sorry about the timeline problem. Either way, Murtha is still a POS. I'm sure you're right. POS is the only way to describe a guy who rises through the ranks of the US Marine Corps to full Colonel, and is awarded a Bronze Star and 2 Purple Hearts for his service in Vietnam. I bet you have a much better record of service. Well hells bells then. I believe there is a senator in prison you posted about. He had a great record so we should let him go thenYou inconsistant rantings are starting to catch up with you"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,156 #9 October 1, 2008 QuoteUnfortunately someone's past doesn't always carry over into the present. If a war hero killed a child, he'd be a POS and it'd be sad that someone who WAS a hero did such things. It is sad that someone who served honorably turned around later in life to defame soldiers currently serving. Someone wrongfully accusing people of mass murders is a POS. Murtha wrongly accused people of mass murder. Do you disagree? Even more amazing is that people on the left accuse McCain of being too old to have his wits about him, but readily believe the rantings of someone 4 years older, like Murtha? Your double standard is ridiculous and obvious. You could, of course, wait for the decision of the court (as is customary in free societies) before finding him guilty. Anyone can file a lawsuit. I hope that when you are his age you will have had as good a record of service.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #10 October 1, 2008 QuoteQuoteUnfortunately someone's past doesn't always carry over into the present. If a war hero killed a child, he'd be a POS and it'd be sad that someone who WAS a hero did such things. It is sad that someone who served honorably turned around later in life to defame soldiers currently serving. Someone wrongfully accusing people of mass murders is a POS. Murtha wrongly accused people of mass murder. Do you disagree? Even more amazing is that people on the left accuse McCain of being too old to have his wits about him, but readily believe the rantings of someone 4 years older, like Murtha? Your double standard is ridiculous and obvious. You could, of course, wait for the decision of the court (as is customary in free societies) before finding him guilty. Anyone can file a lawsuit. Quote Why? Murhta did not and you usually dont!"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mirage62 0 #11 October 1, 2008 John your getting KILLED here!! Better to just go quitely into the night on this one. Murtha did run his mouth, maybe it was a mistake, but he blew it. your showing your huge double standard. Besides he's older than YOU!Kevin Keenan is my hero, a double FUP, he does so much with so little Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,156 #12 October 1, 2008 Quote Quote Quote Unfortunately someone's past doesn't always carry over into the present. If a war hero killed a child, he'd be a POS and it'd be sad that someone who WAS a hero did such things. It is sad that someone who served honorably turned around later in life to defame soldiers currently serving. Someone wrongfully accusing people of mass murders is a POS. Murtha wrongly accused people of mass murder. Do you disagree? Even more amazing is that people on the left accuse McCain of being too old to have his wits about him, but readily believe the rantings of someone 4 years older, like Murtha? Your double standard is ridiculous and obvious. You could, of course, wait for the decision of the court (as is customary in free societies) before finding him guilty. Anyone can file a lawsuit. Quote Why? Murhta did not and you usually dont! From the article: "Geary acknowledged that the congressman never mentioned his client by name," Republican William Russell, challenging Murtha this year, has resurrected the theme. In fact, Russell’s campaign Web site features a “personal video message” from Justin Sharratt’s father, Darryl. And Russell’s only television ad has focused on Murtha’s Haditha comments. Geary denied that Sharratt’s lawsuit is connected in any way to the Russell campaign. Instead, he said, the legal action must be filed now because a statute of limitations for slander lawsuits is about to expire. “There’s no political motivation whatsoever,” Geary said Oh no, no political motivation.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Trent 0 #13 October 1, 2008 QuoteYou could, of course, wait for the decision of the court (as is customary in free societies) before finding him guilty. Anyone can file a lawsuit. I hope that when you are his age you will have had as good a record of service. Murtha SHOULD be sued over what he said. He really hurt those guys and our troops in general. I'm GLAD he's being sued and I HOPE they win. How's that? I hope you'll remember your bullshit attempts to make me compare myself to Murtha's past when you try to rip McCain apart. And just because someone did great things in the past, doesn't mean they can't become a shithead today. Why are you so eager to excuse what he did? You're losing every battle here lately. Just give up.Oh, hello again! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,156 #14 October 1, 2008 QuoteQuoteYou could, of course, wait for the decision of the court (as is customary in free societies) before finding him guilty. Anyone can file a lawsuit. I hope that when you are his age you will have had as good a record of service. Murtha SHOULD be sued over what he said. He really hurt those guys and our troops in general. I'm GLAD he's being sued and I HOPE they win. How's that? I hope you'll remember your bullshit attempts to make me compare myself to Murtha's past when you try to rip McCain apart. And just because someone did great things in the past, doesn't mean they can't become a shithead today. Why are you so eager to excuse what he did? You're losing every battle here lately. Just give up. Just in the interest of accuracy, I have NOT called McCain a POS or anything resembling that. And don't proclaim victory prematurely.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #15 October 1, 2008 Quote Quote You could, of course, wait for the decision of the court (as is customary in free societies) before finding him guilty. Anyone can file a lawsuit. I hope that when you are his age you will have had as good a record of service. Murtha SHOULD be sued over what he said. He really hurt those guys and our troops in general. I'm GLAD he's being sued and I HOPE they win. How's that? I hope you'll remember your bullshit attempts to make me compare myself to Murtha's past when you try to rip McCain apart. And just because someone did great things in the past, doesn't mean they can't become a shithead today. Why are you so eager to excuse what he did? You're losing every battle here lately. Just give up. It has been a tough couple of weeks for him here huh! "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,156 #16 October 1, 2008 Quote Quote Quote You could, of course, wait for the decision of the court (as is customary in free societies) before finding him guilty. Anyone can file a lawsuit. I hope that when you are his age you will have had as good a record of service. Murtha SHOULD be sued over what he said. He really hurt those guys and our troops in general. I'm GLAD he's being sued and I HOPE they win. How's that? I hope you'll remember your bullshit attempts to make me compare myself to Murtha's past when you try to rip McCain apart. And just because someone did great things in the past, doesn't mean they can't become a shithead today. Why are you so eager to excuse what he did? You're losing every battle here lately. Just give up. It has been a tough couple of weeks for him here huh! Don't hurt your shoulder patting yourself on the back, Marc. By the way, how's that Ted Stevens trial going? I... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites downwardspiral 0 #17 October 1, 2008 Quote Quote Sorry about the timeline problem. Either way, Murtha is still a POS. I'm sure you're right. POS is the only way to describe a guy who rises through the ranks of the US Marine Corps to full Colonel, and is awarded a Bronze Star and 2 Purple Hearts for his service in Vietnam. I bet you have a much better record of service. This guy IS a POS. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Cunningham On this very forum I contended that Haditha never happened at the hands of the Marines. Based on how the story came out as well as details of how it happened I theorized the incident was a very elaborate propoganda scheme by the insurgents to set up the Marines. Fuck, the source for the magazine article (Time I believe) was a well known insurgent propoganda agent and yet Murtha fell for it as well as many people here. It was all over the front page. But now that the Marines have been aquitted....mums the word. I hope Murtha pays dearly for the damage he has done. And his military service does not absolve him of shit....it only means he should have known better. BTW Shit like Haditha does happen. Soldiers and Marines snap after seeing too many of their brothers killed. BUT CO's never just sweep it under the rug.www.FourWheelerHB.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 23 #18 October 1, 2008 By the way, how's that Ted Stevens trial going? I why should I care?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites quade 4 #19 October 1, 2008 QuoteMurtha sued over remarks It's October, surprise!quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Trent 0 #20 October 1, 2008 Just continue to defend the indefensible... it does wonders for your credibility!! Pure entertainment.Oh, hello again! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Amazon 7 #21 October 1, 2008 Quote Geary denied that Sharratt’s lawsuit is connected in any way to the Russell campaign. Instead, he said, the legal action must be filed now because a statute of limitations for slander lawsuits is about to expire. “There’s no political motivation whatsoever,” Geary said Um hum..... yeah right. So were they exonerated of the charges??? Or was there not enough evidence. I was thinking at the time that Murtha did not like HIS CORPS being shown in that kind of light. Actions like what happened in SEVERAL instances reflect POORLY on all those who DO SERVE honorably.Of Course.. those who did not serve.. well thier milage seems to VARY depending on if there is a big (R) after someones name. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,156 #22 October 1, 2008 QuoteJust continue to defend the indefensible... it does wonders for your credibility!! Pure entertainment. Uh - last time I checked no judgment had been made against him. If that happens, I'll agree with you.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites warpedskydiver 0 #23 October 1, 2008 QuoteQuoteJust continue to defend the indefensible... it does wonders for your credibility!! Pure entertainment. Uh - last time I checked no judgment had been made against him. If that happens, I'll agree with you. Make up your mind, first you agreed with Murtha. YOU PROBABLY STILL DO. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,156 #24 October 1, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuoteJust continue to defend the indefensible... it does wonders for your credibility!! Pure entertainment. Uh - last time I checked no judgment had been made against him. If that happens, I'll agree with you. Make up your mind, first you agreed with Murtha. YOU PROBABLY STILL DO. I wrote in the relevant thread about Hathida: "There is no argument. Nothing to debate until the official enquiry reaches a conclusion." How is that agreeing with one side or the other? Please post a link to any post where I prejudged the issue. Or is this another one of your baseless attacks like the one on the 16-way team that you claimed didn't exist? It is the righties like you that are prejudging a lawsuit that hasn't come to court yet.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites lawrocket 3 #25 October 1, 2008 Had Murtha said it on the floor of Congress there would be no case, because things said in front of the legislature are privileged. But he said it on Larry King. D'Oh! My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 Next Page 1 of 2 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
mirage62 0 #11 October 1, 2008 John your getting KILLED here!! Better to just go quitely into the night on this one. Murtha did run his mouth, maybe it was a mistake, but he blew it. your showing your huge double standard. Besides he's older than YOU!Kevin Keenan is my hero, a double FUP, he does so much with so little Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,156 #12 October 1, 2008 Quote Quote Quote Unfortunately someone's past doesn't always carry over into the present. If a war hero killed a child, he'd be a POS and it'd be sad that someone who WAS a hero did such things. It is sad that someone who served honorably turned around later in life to defame soldiers currently serving. Someone wrongfully accusing people of mass murders is a POS. Murtha wrongly accused people of mass murder. Do you disagree? Even more amazing is that people on the left accuse McCain of being too old to have his wits about him, but readily believe the rantings of someone 4 years older, like Murtha? Your double standard is ridiculous and obvious. You could, of course, wait for the decision of the court (as is customary in free societies) before finding him guilty. Anyone can file a lawsuit. Quote Why? Murhta did not and you usually dont! From the article: "Geary acknowledged that the congressman never mentioned his client by name," Republican William Russell, challenging Murtha this year, has resurrected the theme. In fact, Russell’s campaign Web site features a “personal video message” from Justin Sharratt’s father, Darryl. And Russell’s only television ad has focused on Murtha’s Haditha comments. Geary denied that Sharratt’s lawsuit is connected in any way to the Russell campaign. Instead, he said, the legal action must be filed now because a statute of limitations for slander lawsuits is about to expire. “There’s no political motivation whatsoever,” Geary said Oh no, no political motivation.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Trent 0 #13 October 1, 2008 QuoteYou could, of course, wait for the decision of the court (as is customary in free societies) before finding him guilty. Anyone can file a lawsuit. I hope that when you are his age you will have had as good a record of service. Murtha SHOULD be sued over what he said. He really hurt those guys and our troops in general. I'm GLAD he's being sued and I HOPE they win. How's that? I hope you'll remember your bullshit attempts to make me compare myself to Murtha's past when you try to rip McCain apart. And just because someone did great things in the past, doesn't mean they can't become a shithead today. Why are you so eager to excuse what he did? You're losing every battle here lately. Just give up.Oh, hello again! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,156 #14 October 1, 2008 QuoteQuoteYou could, of course, wait for the decision of the court (as is customary in free societies) before finding him guilty. Anyone can file a lawsuit. I hope that when you are his age you will have had as good a record of service. Murtha SHOULD be sued over what he said. He really hurt those guys and our troops in general. I'm GLAD he's being sued and I HOPE they win. How's that? I hope you'll remember your bullshit attempts to make me compare myself to Murtha's past when you try to rip McCain apart. And just because someone did great things in the past, doesn't mean they can't become a shithead today. Why are you so eager to excuse what he did? You're losing every battle here lately. Just give up. Just in the interest of accuracy, I have NOT called McCain a POS or anything resembling that. And don't proclaim victory prematurely.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #15 October 1, 2008 Quote Quote You could, of course, wait for the decision of the court (as is customary in free societies) before finding him guilty. Anyone can file a lawsuit. I hope that when you are his age you will have had as good a record of service. Murtha SHOULD be sued over what he said. He really hurt those guys and our troops in general. I'm GLAD he's being sued and I HOPE they win. How's that? I hope you'll remember your bullshit attempts to make me compare myself to Murtha's past when you try to rip McCain apart. And just because someone did great things in the past, doesn't mean they can't become a shithead today. Why are you so eager to excuse what he did? You're losing every battle here lately. Just give up. It has been a tough couple of weeks for him here huh! "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,156 #16 October 1, 2008 Quote Quote Quote You could, of course, wait for the decision of the court (as is customary in free societies) before finding him guilty. Anyone can file a lawsuit. I hope that when you are his age you will have had as good a record of service. Murtha SHOULD be sued over what he said. He really hurt those guys and our troops in general. I'm GLAD he's being sued and I HOPE they win. How's that? I hope you'll remember your bullshit attempts to make me compare myself to Murtha's past when you try to rip McCain apart. And just because someone did great things in the past, doesn't mean they can't become a shithead today. Why are you so eager to excuse what he did? You're losing every battle here lately. Just give up. It has been a tough couple of weeks for him here huh! Don't hurt your shoulder patting yourself on the back, Marc. By the way, how's that Ted Stevens trial going? I... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
downwardspiral 0 #17 October 1, 2008 Quote Quote Sorry about the timeline problem. Either way, Murtha is still a POS. I'm sure you're right. POS is the only way to describe a guy who rises through the ranks of the US Marine Corps to full Colonel, and is awarded a Bronze Star and 2 Purple Hearts for his service in Vietnam. I bet you have a much better record of service. This guy IS a POS. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_Cunningham On this very forum I contended that Haditha never happened at the hands of the Marines. Based on how the story came out as well as details of how it happened I theorized the incident was a very elaborate propoganda scheme by the insurgents to set up the Marines. Fuck, the source for the magazine article (Time I believe) was a well known insurgent propoganda agent and yet Murtha fell for it as well as many people here. It was all over the front page. But now that the Marines have been aquitted....mums the word. I hope Murtha pays dearly for the damage he has done. And his military service does not absolve him of shit....it only means he should have known better. BTW Shit like Haditha does happen. Soldiers and Marines snap after seeing too many of their brothers killed. BUT CO's never just sweep it under the rug.www.FourWheelerHB.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #18 October 1, 2008 By the way, how's that Ted Stevens trial going? I why should I care?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #19 October 1, 2008 QuoteMurtha sued over remarks It's October, surprise!quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Trent 0 #20 October 1, 2008 Just continue to defend the indefensible... it does wonders for your credibility!! Pure entertainment.Oh, hello again! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #21 October 1, 2008 Quote Geary denied that Sharratt’s lawsuit is connected in any way to the Russell campaign. Instead, he said, the legal action must be filed now because a statute of limitations for slander lawsuits is about to expire. “There’s no political motivation whatsoever,” Geary said Um hum..... yeah right. So were they exonerated of the charges??? Or was there not enough evidence. I was thinking at the time that Murtha did not like HIS CORPS being shown in that kind of light. Actions like what happened in SEVERAL instances reflect POORLY on all those who DO SERVE honorably.Of Course.. those who did not serve.. well thier milage seems to VARY depending on if there is a big (R) after someones name. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,156 #22 October 1, 2008 QuoteJust continue to defend the indefensible... it does wonders for your credibility!! Pure entertainment. Uh - last time I checked no judgment had been made against him. If that happens, I'll agree with you.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
warpedskydiver 0 #23 October 1, 2008 QuoteQuoteJust continue to defend the indefensible... it does wonders for your credibility!! Pure entertainment. Uh - last time I checked no judgment had been made against him. If that happens, I'll agree with you. Make up your mind, first you agreed with Murtha. YOU PROBABLY STILL DO. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,156 #24 October 1, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuoteJust continue to defend the indefensible... it does wonders for your credibility!! Pure entertainment. Uh - last time I checked no judgment had been made against him. If that happens, I'll agree with you. Make up your mind, first you agreed with Murtha. YOU PROBABLY STILL DO. I wrote in the relevant thread about Hathida: "There is no argument. Nothing to debate until the official enquiry reaches a conclusion." How is that agreeing with one side or the other? Please post a link to any post where I prejudged the issue. Or is this another one of your baseless attacks like the one on the 16-way team that you claimed didn't exist? It is the righties like you that are prejudging a lawsuit that hasn't come to court yet.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #25 October 1, 2008 Had Murtha said it on the floor of Congress there would be no case, because things said in front of the legislature are privileged. But he said it on Larry King. D'Oh! My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
