0
rushmc

The Paulson Plan Will Make Money For Taxpayers (aka the government)

Recommended Posts

Quote


The government deregulated the industry enough to allow that to happen, so yes, the government should do what it can to limit the repercussions to the economy, repercussions that would otherwise be suffered by people who didn't take out sub-prime mortgages or invest in companies or funds that held securities backed by such mortgages.



It looks like the deregulated industry has already corrected itself. At least nobody nowadays gives stated income loans, and most banks implemented very tough qualifying criteria like proving that you actually have a job. Those who made bad investments will be wiped out. Those who did not will take their place and make money. No matter whether you do something or not it will affect everyone.

Personally I don't think we need any bailout at all. The investors capitalized gain - let them capitalize loss as well. This will be a good lesson for everyone else.
* Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The investors capitalized gain - let them capitalize loss as well. This will be a good lesson for everyone else.



They will still have to take their losses. Bailout loans won't change that. However, with the bailouts, the companies likely will not fail due to those losses, which would have more dire consequences not only for those companies, but for the entire economy.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

The investors capitalized gain - let them capitalize loss as well. This will be a good lesson for everyone else.



They will still have to take their losses. Bailout loans won't change that. However, with the bailouts, the companies likely will not fail due to those losses, which would have more dire consequences not only for those companies, but for the entire economy.



Seems to me that if the taxpayers are going to be asked to pony up $700B to help the economy, there are much better places to invest the money than in companies that have shown total inability to take care of their own core businesses.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

The investors capitalized gain - let them capitalize loss as well. This will be a good lesson for everyone else.



They will still have to take their losses. Bailout loans won't change that. However, with the bailouts, the companies likely will not fail due to those losses, which would have more dire consequences not only for those companies, but for the entire economy.



Seems to me that if the taxpayers are going to be asked to pony up $700B to help the economy, there are much better places to invest the money than in companies that have shown total inability to take care of their own core businesses.



Seems to me that you want to ignore the core reason for this mess. While corps have thier part the main vilian here IS the government.

Now, many/most companies chose not to get themselves in as deep as those failing but, we need to recognize that this failure is because of government and the crooks who protected their money trees fannie and freddie.

As for the bail out? I think it is a bad idea. It just grows the governement and covers up the real problem
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is from my post on the other related thread and explains why I think the gov is the most to blame for this mess.

"“Just a few minutes ago, a reporter was asking me about this and saying, ‘Barney Frank is saying that’s just – because there were allegations,’ correct ones – ‘that Fannie and Freddie have been the playground for politicians for years and now the other side is saying Fannie and Freddie were just a small part of this and this goes far beyond.’ It does, but these same people a couple of weeks ago said, ‘You got to bail out Fannie and Freddie because they touch everything out there. They touch nearly every mortgage out there.’ And because of that explicit guarantee – that we would come and bail them out, nobody has been subject to market discipline.
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Seems to me that if the taxpayers are going to be asked to pony up $700B to help the economy, there are much better places to invest the money than in companies that have shown total inability to take care of their own core businesses.



Under normal circumstances, I would agree. However, these investments currently are bargains, provided current management methods are abandoned in favor of responsible behavior. That's not to say I like the idea of having to bail out major players of the financial sector, just that it appears to be the least painful option.

It's something of a catch 22, really. If we bail the companies out, then we send the wrong message to corporations regarding their behavior. OTOH, if we don't bail them out, and simply allow them to fail, we can't hold them responsible for the behavior that caused their financial woes to begin with, with the possible exception of a few individuals.

Whether or not the bailout loans are approved by Congress, Congress needs to make a priority of passing legislation to prevent this again, including, but not necessarily limited to, the repeal of GLBA.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

While corps have thier part the main vilian here IS the government



Specifically, the government's actions towards deregulation of the financial industry played a huge role. Of course, it's hard to believe any assertions that corporations did not play a major role in that via lobbying and campaign contributions.

I suspect one would be hard pressed to find any prominent (national) politicians that are not tied in any way to key players of corporations that are failing or have failed within the past ten years.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

The investors capitalized gain - let them capitalize loss as well. This will be a good lesson for everyone else.



They will still have to take their losses. Bailout loans won't change that. However, with the bailouts, the companies likely will not fail due to those losses, which would have more dire consequences not only for those companies, but for the entire economy.



Seems to me that if the taxpayers are going to be asked to pony up $700B to help the economy, there are much better places to invest the money than in companies that have shown total inability to take care of their own core businesses.



That's twice in a week that we agree on something.

Not a dime, I say.

If these companies are hurting, they should sweating their marketing and investor relations people to beg "us" for investment, not compulsory tax bail-out from the government.
So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

While corps have thier part the main vilian here IS the government



Specifically, the government's actions towards deregulation of the financial industry played a huge role.NO it did not!! Of course, it's hard to believe any assertions that corporations did not play a major role in that via lobbying and campaign contributions.I have not said that, they participated willingly under the rules given and, as I also posted, they played the part

I suspect one would be hard pressed to find any prominent (national) politicians that are not tied in any way to key players of corporations that are failing or have failed within the past ten years.



The government caused this. A few key politions are the main criminals (in both parties) The very fact that none of them are screaming for Senate and House investigations and hearings is very very telling
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If these companies are hurting, they should sweating their marketing and investor relations people to beg "us" for investment, not compulsory tax bail-out from the government.



YES!!
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

NO it did not!!



Nearly everyone who understands economic policy at all disagrees with you.


Quote

I have not said that, they participated willingly under the rules given and, as I also posted, they played the part



Right. The corporations lobbied Congress to have the rules changed, and then participated willingly under the new rules given. Those new rules, i.e. deregulation, need to be rescinded.

Quote

Quote

I suspect one would be hard pressed to find any prominent (national) politicians that are not tied in any way to key players of corporations that are failing or have failed within the past ten years.



The government caused this.



The government set the financial sector up for failure by repealing important provisions of the Glass-Steagall Act, and thus share responsibility. But, make no mistake, it was poor corporate leadership that caused this.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>If these companies are hurting, they should sweating their marketing and investor
>relations people to beg "us" for investment, not compulsory tax bail-out from the
>government.

Ironically the opposite is happening; lawmakers are "sweetening the pot" so more firms will accept the money. Very odd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



The government caused this. A few key politions are the main criminals (in both parties) The very fact that none of them are screaming for Senate and House investigations and hearings is very very telling



Nonsense. That's the old "You're to blame for not preventing me from doing something stupid" defense. The government didn't force anyone to make credit default swaps or trade in other convoluted derivatives.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


They will still have to take their losses. Bailout loans won't change that. However, with the bailouts, the companies likely will not fail due to those losses, which would have more dire consequences not only for those companies, but for the entire economy.



If "dire consequences" mean that the banks will not lend any money anymore to a person who works part-time for a minimum wage, and as a result this person will not become a "homeowner" of a 450K property he can never afford, I completely support such "dire consequences".
* Don't pray for me if you wanna help - just send me a check. *

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>If "dire consequences" mean that the banks will not lend any money anymore to a
>person who works part-time for a minimum wage, and as a result this person will
>not become a "homeowner" of a 450K property he can never afford, I completely
>support such "dire consequences".

"Dire consequences" might mean that no one, not even you, can get a mortgage for any price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

NO it did not!!



Nearly everyone who understands economic policy at all disagrees with you.as soon as a statement like this is made all credibility is lost


Quote

I have not said that, they participated willingly under the rules given and, as I also posted, they played the part



Right. The corporations lobbied Congress to have the rules changed, and then participated willingly under the new rules given. Those new rules, i.e. deregulation, need to be rescinded.

Quote

Quote

I suspect one would be hard pressed to find any prominent (national) politicians that are not tied in any way to key players of corporations that are failing or have failed within the past ten years.



The government caused this.



The government set the financial sector up for failure by repealing important provisions of the Glass-Steagall Act, and thus share responsibility. But, make no mistake, it was poor corporate leadership that caused this.

it was PART of it. Fair housing bull shit is what is the cause
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote



The government caused this. A few key politions are the main criminals (in both parties) The very fact that none of them are screaming for Senate and House investigations and hearings is very very telling



Nonsense. That's the old "You're to blame for not preventing me from doing something stupid" defense. The government didn't force anyone to make credit default swaps or trade in other convoluted derivatives.



That is not true. They did but threatened punative actions should they not lend money to those the gove thought they should.

I am not saying the corps did not go overboard but the cause is still the cause
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote



The government caused this. A few key politions are the main criminals (in both parties) The very fact that none of them are screaming for Senate and House investigations and hearings is very very telling



Nonsense. That's the old "You're to blame for not preventing me from doing something stupid" defense. The government didn't force anyone to make credit default swaps or trade in other convoluted derivatives.



That is not true.



Please provide evidence that the government forced any bank to make credit default swaps or trade in other convoluted derivatives or fancily packaged debt instruments.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote



The government caused this. A few key politions are the main criminals (in both parties) The very fact that none of them are screaming for Senate and House investigations and hearings is very very telling



Nonsense. That's the old "You're to blame for not preventing me from doing something stupid" defense. The government didn't force anyone to make credit default swaps or trade in other convoluted derivatives.



That is not true.



Please provide evidence that the government forced any bank to make credit default swaps or trade in other convoluted derivatives or fancily packaged debt instruments.



It can only be corporations for you can it.

Evil profit gathering bastards.

I will see if I can find Clintons speach that addreses what I posted. I do not expect it to make any difference to you. For you the bigger the gov the better, the more regulation the better, the more they tax the better.
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I found the name "Community Reinvestment Act"

Now I will see if I can find the speach

Link provided but I did not read it all

http://www.thekidalog.com/seejanemom/2008/09/c1992-bill-clin.html
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
http://www.ffiec.gov/cra/

http://tsfiles.wordpress.com/tag/government-engineered-mortgage-crisis/

"Jimmah Carter started the rot that led to the present financial crisis"

http://www.stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/09/22/jimmah-carter-started-the-rot-that-led-to-the-present-financial-crisis/

From the year 2000

http://www.city-journal.org/html/10_1_the_trillion_dollar.html

Still looking for Clintons threats regarding this bill
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
From the last link of the post above

"The Clinton administration's get-tough regulatory regime mattered so crucially because bank deregulation had set off a wave of mega-mergers, including the acquisition of the Bank of America by NationsBank, BankBoston by Fleet Financial, and Bankers Trust by Deutsche Bank. Regulatory approval of such mergers depended, in part, on positive CRA ratings. "To avoid the possibility of a denied or delayed application," advises the NCRC in its deadpan tone, "lending institutions have an incentive to make formal agreements with community organizations." By intervening—even just threatening to intervene—in the CRA review process, left-wing nonprofit groups have been able to gain control over eye-popping pools of bank capital, which they in turn parcel out to individual low-income mortgage seekers. A radical group called ACORN Housing has a $760 million commitment from the Bank of New York; the Boston-based Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America has a $3-billion agreement with the Bank of America; a coalition of groups headed by New Jersey Citizen Action has a five-year, $13-billion agreement with First Union Corporation. Similar deals operate in almost every major U.S. city. Observes Tom Callahan, executive director of the Massachusetts Affordable Housing Alliance, which has $220 million in bank mortgage money to parcel out, "CRA is the backbone of everything we do."
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The info is out there if you care to look.

Any ideas where I may find a library of Clintons speaches? I think you might be surprised at what he says
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Please provide evidence that the government forced any bank to make credit default swaps or trade in other convoluted derivatives.



Why? That is not what is being talked about here. You want to talk about that stop derailing this thread and start your own.

Mortgages are what we are talking about, if these istruments are part of that then they got the same starting place too
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0