rushmc 23 #26 September 13, 2008 Quote Do you? There are actually three parts. But Bush did not give them the name doctrine. The liberal media did. How can anybody that thinks the Bush doctrine is bad not be able to say what it is? After all, their source is where the name came from"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
christelsabine 1 #27 September 13, 2008 Quote Do you? Yes. Ask Wolfowitz. dudeist skydiver # 3105 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1969912 0 #28 September 13, 2008 Quote Quote Do you? Yes. Ask Wolfowitz. Ten minutes googling "Bush Doctrine", and that's all you can come up with? "Once we got to the point where twenty/something's needed a place on the corner that changed the oil in their cars we were doomed . . ." -NickDG Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FallloutboyDAoC 0 #29 September 13, 2008 http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=bush+doctrine Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
christelsabine 1 #30 September 13, 2008 Quote Quote Quote Do you? Yes. Ask Wolfowitz. Ten minutes googling "Bush Doctrine", and that's all you can come up with? No. I knew a bit longer as I'm reading on a daily basis, and not only the actual prices of milk. Why didn't your "surprise praline" Palin google a bit? Or MCains counselors before instructing her what to answer? She might have been looking much better. dudeist skydiver # 3105 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1969912 0 #31 September 13, 2008 QuoteWhy didn't your "surprise praline" Palin google a bit? Because there is no formal definition of the "Bush Doctrine". Start here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_Doctrine "Once we got to the point where twenty/something's needed a place on the corner that changed the oil in their cars we were doomed . . ." -NickDG Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #32 September 13, 2008 QuoteQuoteWhy didn't your "surprise praline" Palin google a bit? Because there is no formal definition of the "Bush Doctrine". Start here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_Doctrine If that is admitted then Gibson's question was stupid of him, not Palin....."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
christelsabine 1 #33 September 13, 2008 Quote Quote Why didn't your "surprise praline" Palin google a bit? Because there is no formal definition of the "Bush Doctrine". Start here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_Doctrine Why did Charlie ask her, then? 3 times? BTW: Wikipedia is poor sh*t. There are better explanations available. Again: Why did Charlie ask Palin several times? Insisting on an answer? dudeist skydiver # 3105 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #34 September 13, 2008 Quote She did not even know what Bush Doctrine means. WHO created that title? Dam, you really dont get it do you? She made Gibson look like a fool! "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #35 September 13, 2008 Quote Quote Quote Why didn't your "surprise praline" Palin google a bit? Because there is no formal definition of the "Bush Doctrine". Start here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_Doctrine Why did Charlie ask her, then? 3 times? BTW: Wikipedia is poor sh*t. There are better explanations available. Again: Why did Charlie ask Palin several times? Insisting on an answer? Because he was trying to trap her!!! And she was too smart for him? Let me ask you. There are 3 parts as stated by the media (not Bush) What are the three parts of the "Bush Doctrine"?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1969912 0 #36 September 13, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuoteWhy didn't your "surprise praline" Palin google a bit? Because there is no formal definition of the "Bush Doctrine". Start here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_Doctrine If that is admitted then Gibson's question was stupid of him, not Palin..... No shit. It was a very stupid question. "Once we got to the point where twenty/something's needed a place on the corner that changed the oil in their cars we were doomed . . ." -NickDG Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1969912 0 #37 September 13, 2008 ....And Gov. Palin handled it brilliantly. She made her Charlie define the term (in much the same way as the "Urban Dictionary" defines it), then responded to the question. "Once we got to the point where twenty/something's needed a place on the corner that changed the oil in their cars we were doomed . . ." -NickDG Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1969912 0 #38 September 13, 2008 QuoteWhy did Charlie ask her, then? 3 times? BTW: Wikipedia is poor sh*t. There are better explanations available. Again: Why did Charlie ask Palin several times? Insisting on an answer? Semms rushmc is right - you don't get it. Go ask kallend... "Once we got to the point where twenty/something's needed a place on the corner that changed the oil in their cars we were doomed . . ." -NickDG Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
christelsabine 1 #39 September 13, 2008 Quote ....And Gov. Palin handled it brilliantly. She made her Charlie define the term (in much the same way as the "Urban Dictionary" defines it), then responded to the question. No. He did not define that term. He refused to explain to her. She again asked him "In what way, Charlie?", and then again: "His [Bush's] view of the world, or what?... She simply was overstrained with his question. Jeez, people, believe what you want. I've seen it, my eyes and ears are working fine. And the media is working fine, too - and did show it to the world. No doubt about it. dudeist skydiver # 3105 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1969912 0 #40 September 14, 2008 Quote Quote ....And Gov. Palin handled it brilliantly. She made her Charlie define the term (in much the same way as the "Urban Dictionary" defines it), then responded to the question. No. He did not define that term. He refused to explain to her. She again asked him "In what way, Charlie?", and then again: "His [Bush's] view of the world, or what?... She simply was overstrained with his question. Jeez, people, believe what you want. I've seen it, my eyes and ears are working fine. And the media is working fine, too - and did show it to the world. No doubt about it. From Huffington Post: "GIBSON: Do you agree with the Bush doctrine? PALIN: In what respect, Charlie? GIBSON: The Bush -- well, what do you -- what do you interpret it to be? PALIN: His world view. GIBSON: No, the Bush doctrine, enunciated September 2002, before the Iraq war. PALIN: I believe that what President Bush has attempted to do is rid this world of Islamic extremism, terrorists who are hell bent on destroying our nation. There have been blunders along the way, though. There have been mistakes made. And with new leadership, and that's the beauty of American elections, of course, and democracy, is with new leadership comes opportunity to do things better. GIBSON: The Bush doctrine, as I understand it, is that we have the right of anticipatory self-defense, that we have the right to a preemptive strike against any other country that we think is going to attack us. Do you agree with that? PALIN: Charlie, if there is legitimate and enough intelligence that tells us that a strike is imminent against American people, we have every right to defend our country. In fact, the president has the obligation, the duty to defend." ----- "Once we got to the point where twenty/something's needed a place on the corner that changed the oil in their cars we were doomed . . ." -NickDG Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #41 September 14, 2008 Quote Quote ....And Gov. Palin handled it brilliantly. She made her Charlie define the term (in much the same way as the "Urban Dictionary" defines it), then responded to the question. No. He did not define that term. He refused to explain to her. She again asked him "In what way, Charlie?", and then again: "His [Bush's] view of the world, or what?... She simply was overstrained with his question. Jeez, people, believe what you want. I've seen it, my eyes and ears are working fine. And the media is working fine, too - and did show it to the world. No doubt about it. You still pissed that the US came over there to help put Germany's ass on a platter and hand it back to them or what?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,147 #42 September 14, 2008 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote .... You really need to expand where you get your news fromI am starting to feel sorry for you........ NOT From where, you ask? I do read. Daily. Newspapers, online news in several languages (yes, in French too). But, mainly I enjoy to read US newspapers. And did really enjoy the report about Mrs. Palin's first interview (Bush Doctrine???? What's that??) and her replies. Do a search, you'll find approval of every bit I wrote. No need to feel/feel not sorry for me. I feel great. Reading is a wonderful advantage. I still feel sorry for you because of your Bush doctrine comments. Palin handled that question perfectly. She clarified where HE was coming from and then followed up. I am sorry that such a strong person (woman or man I dont care) has threatened your God given right to have a Dem in power...........NOTdam the libs make this easy If she had farted into the microphone you would still praise her performance for modulation and tone.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #43 September 14, 2008 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote .... You really need to expand where you get your news fromI am starting to feel sorry for you........ NOT From where, you ask? I do read. Daily. Newspapers, online news in several languages (yes, in French too). But, mainly I enjoy to read US newspapers. And did really enjoy the report about Mrs. Palin's first interview (Bush Doctrine???? What's that??) and her replies. Do a search, you'll find approval of every bit I wrote. No need to feel/feel not sorry for me. I feel great. Reading is a wonderful advantage. I still feel sorry for you because of your Bush doctrine comments. Palin handled that question perfectly. She clarified where HE was coming from and then followed up. I am sorry that such a strong person (woman or man I dont care) has threatened your God given right to have a Dem in power...........NOTdam the libs make this easy If she had farted into the microphone you would still praise her performance for modulation and tone. No I would hold my nose. Kind of like I did for this post. But keep making it easy. I am having fun"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #44 September 14, 2008 Quote But keep making it easy. I am having fun Wow that is great Mark... Too bad 4100+ of your fellow Americans are not having fun.. nor will they EVER have fun again.... and your people want to make it go on and on and on on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on How many of your fellow Americans need to die for your leaders lies and arrogance till you and yours will not be having fun anymore Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #45 September 14, 2008 I am not sure why you are such an angry person. I hope you can resolve someday, that which make you so. I do not have as much hope for your narrow view of how this world and this country work and survive. I will now return to ingoring you and reading very few of your posts "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #46 September 14, 2008 Yep.. when you cant argue... make your silly one liners.. then stick your head back in the sand..Whats wrong.. no reruns of Lush Rimjob for you this weekend??? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MikeForsythe 0 #47 September 14, 2008 Quote Yep.. when you cant argue Well I can, if your democrat controlled congress has been in power for two years then why the fuck have you not ended the war and brought our brave home?Time and pressure will always show you who a person really is! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 893 #48 September 14, 2008 lack of resolve? actually understanding?? afraid to show THEY could??? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #49 September 14, 2008 Because ALL of you who support the war will not allow them.....to defund our troops while they are in the field..THEY are not the COMMANDER IN CHIEF.. who has the power to bring them home.. You can TRY to blame the congress.. but it comes down to who sent them there.. and HOW he sent them there. And you will vote to continue it on and on and on....I am sick and tired of the attitude of using the war war... before there has been jaw jaw. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tonyhays 86 #50 September 14, 2008 *Yawn*.....why even bother...if you can't argue effectively just type in capital letters NEO-CON, CHICKENHAWK, and RUSH LIMJOB and let the shouting take care of it for you. Or, if you are a NEO-CON, just type in CLINTON DID IT FIRST, BLOWJOB, ILLEGAL WAR, blah blah blah. Hmmm...seeing a pattern here...i think so.“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.” Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
