Mormonism being declared untrue+Obama being a Lamanite

[jakee 1,648]

Quote

I got as far as you claiming that I've an assumption that all religions are perfect and decided to end reading your pish right there and then.

You've still got half a post to reply to then.

Quote

Because I didn't make that assumption.

I have never seen you concede that religion tself has been the cause of something bad. Every time that someone comes up with an example of something bad that stems from religion you always, always, always pin it on 'misuse' and 'misapplication'.

So go on, if you don't think that religion itself is perfect, tell me something bad that has been caused by religion itself?

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[vortexring 0]

Your final question is foolish. Answer yourself again applying common sense and I might deem myself to refrain from fuckin' my old boots and pay attention to your rather silly replies.

'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'

[christelsabine 1]

Quote

You were upset when Diana died!?

Ok - it's sad when anybody dies, but if you'd been with me and my mates we'd have soon cheered you up, besides making you breathe our old boots. My buddy pretend quoted the headlines from 'The Sun'.

'Dead As A Dodi....'



As in Dodo? Ya get it?

Ya get it?? Do I look that dumb??

Dodi, Doda, Dildo - pheww! Who cares. I'd take his father. He's got the money.

(Di: RIP, i'm busy)

dudeist skydiver # 3105

[jakee 1,648]

Quote

Your final question is foolish. Answer yourself again applying common sense and I might deem myself to refrain from fuckin' my old boots and pay attention to your rather silly replies.

In other words, ya got nothing. Business as usual then.

Y'know, if you ever actually stopped and thought critically about your positions, rather than just attacking anyone who asks a difficult question about them you might actually learn something. Guess you're not interested in that.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[vortexring 0]

I've never attacked your points Jakee - I've only attacked your arrogant assumptions and misquotes. As you know.

Although I'm delighted to read you believe I avoid answering difficult questions in regards to my posts.

I welcome them. I've often had the pleasure of reading SC's reasoning on why my assertions are false, and then had constructive discussions, either publically, or privately.

You, I'm afraid to say, (in fact I'm not) are the typical wee man with a bag of McCains on his shoulder.

I enjoy your points, believe it or not, but what I don't enjoy is your attitude. For a start, it often clouds your point, and secondly, it makes me wish to introduce you to my 'bestfriend', a 2inch lump-hammer.

You'd love 'im!

'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'

[jakee 1,648]

Quote

I've only attacked your arrogant assumptions and misquotes.

Bullshit. Do I need to bring up the recent thread where you threw all manner of ad homs at me for 3 pages before admitting that I was actually right?

I think it is absolutely priceless that you attack my posting style when you are always the first to resort to name calling, swearing, threats of violence, claims that you've answered questions you haven't touched upon, refusals to answer other pertinent questions because you decree that they are not relevant... the list goes on.

Quote

You, I'm afraid to say, (in fact I'm not) are the typical wee man with a bag of McCains on his shoulder.

Nope. I'm just the one who brings up things that you can't answer, and that really fucks you off.

Feel free to start proving that last point wrong by either A) explaining why it is strange that someone should believe that their religion is the only true one, or B) giving an example of something bad happening as a result of religion, not man's misuse of it.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[christelsabine 1]

Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - This is the War Room!

dudeist skydiver # 3105

[vortexring 0]

Quote

Quote

I've only attacked your arrogant assumptions and misquotes.

Bullshit. Do I need to bring up the recent thread where you threw all manner of ad homs at me for 3 pages before admitting that I was actually right?

Fair enough - that's a good point, but as you know, I was happy enough to recognize when I was wrong. And I apologized. You never do. Ever. You'll lead the discussion onto something else; always avoiding the points I've directed at you.

Quote

I think it is absolutely priceless that you attack my posting style when you are always the first to resort to name calling, swearing, threats of violence, claims that you've answered questions you haven't touched upon, refusals to answer other pertinent questions because you decree that they are not relevant... the list goes on.

I'm so glad ya' do - if you take away my lump hammer, it also applies to you.

Quote

You, I'm afraid to say, (in fact I'm not) are the typical wee man with a bag of McCains on his shoulder.

Nope. I'm just the one who brings up things that you can't answer, and that really fucks you off.

[Skyrad 0]

Quote

why would someone laminate a presidential candidate?

it was because he is black, init.

When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy.
Lucius Annaeus Seneca

[Skyrad 0]

Quote

And NO. I did NOT see these freaks, I just broke down in front of TV, eyes filled with tears .... and did not move a millimeter for 3 days

You couldn't see the freaks crying because your eyes were full of tears!

When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy.
Lucius Annaeus Seneca

[jakee 1,648]

Quote

And I apologized. You never do.

You've never shown me to be blatantly wrong, and I've never been that offensive.

Quote

You'll lead the discussion onto something else; always avoiding the points I've directed at you.

Where?

Quote

Not really.

Then why don't you ever answer?

Quote

Ok, after you've answered the questions I've asked yourself.

Oh, the classic dodge. That one's getting really old. What makes this particularly special though, is that not one of your replies to me in this thread contains a question mark. Just what on earth am I supposed to be answering?

Now, I've asked you relevant, on topic questions, if you don't answer them, then I can only assume you can't answer them.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[christelsabine 1]

Quote

Quote

And I apologized. You never do.

*Sniff*

There still is love. In the air.

Where's a willl there's a bush, Jakee and Vortex, please....

(Running away, hiding, breaking down in tears, laughing my pretty a** off ...)

dudeist skydiver # 3105

• Quote

[vortexring 0]

The classic dodge! Fuck off! Justify the utter pish you wrote earlier on the thread! Justify and explain your usual trolling nonsense. This is fucking hilarious.

Look - do yourself a favour - go back and look at your wank original reply.

And in fact, the one after that.

Once you've applied yourself to this, feel free to get back to me.

But do yourself a favour. Abstain from your typical and pathetic whine.

It's un-manly. It makes me think less of you.

'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'

[Skyrad 0]

Quote

But do yourself a favour. Abstain from your typical and pathetic whine.

It's un-manly. It makes me think less of you.

LMAO

When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy.
Lucius Annaeus Seneca

[jakee 1,648]

Quote

Look - do yourself a favour - go back and look at your wank original reply.

It contained two points.

Point 1) Why is it strange to believe that one's religion is the only true religion? I stand by that question, which you have not answered (and, judging by your reply to it, misread).

Point 2) A large portion of the historical/ scientific claims of other religions (similar to the mormon crap which the Smithsonian refuted) is also recognised by official bodies to be utter rubbish. Re. the evangelical christians and their belief in creationism. What exactly is wrong about this statement?

Quote

And in fact, the one after that.

4 points.

Point 1: I tell you why you haven't answered point 1 of my first reply.

Point 2: Explain why it is not only reasonable but to be expected that a religious person should believe his religion to be the only true one.

Point 3: Concerns your monotonous misuse and misapplication piffle.

Point 4: Expansion of point 2 of my original reply.

There ya go, I've looked at it, I've considered it, and a) I'm right, and b) you haven't answered my questions. You're just back to your usual name calling, ad homs, refusals, whinging and general assorted shite. Why start a thread if you're not even going to try and engage your grey matter with the actual topic?

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[vortexring 0]

It's nice to read a more mature and un-fuckin-baby-boy-like-reply. Well done.

You've some good questions which I recognize. But see again my reply to your post number 24:


'I got as far as you claiming that I've an assumption that all religions are perfect and decided to end reading your pish right there and then.

Because I didn't make that assumption.

Behave yerself!'

Hopefully that should be able to re-iterate my earlier points, and you'll also try and man the fuck up in regards to our said banter.

'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'

[jakee 1,648]

Quote

You've some good questions which I recognize.

Then fucking address them instead of bitching and moaning like a schoolgirl who's had her favourite hairband stolen.*

Quote

Hopefully that should be able to re-iterate my earlier points,

Eh? The device that you've used to justify ignoring everything else I've said is what is supposed to illuminate your points? I don't get it.

Anyway, you still haven't demonstrated that I've misread your position. To use an analogy, you're like an african witchdoctor defending his magic rituals that supposedly makes warriors impervious to harm. Whenever one of them gets shot up it's never that the magic is faulty, it's that it wasn't used properly. The garlic was picked out of season, he didn't pray to the sun enough times on wednesday or wash his left foot after stepping through the front door. That's the same way you defend religions, any and all criticism can automatically be brushed off as misuse, without you ever having to consider that the underlying concept might be flawed.

Now fucking front up and answer some bloody questions instead of running away and crying about being so fucking misunderstood or that the big bad man is being too mean to you.*









* Banter.

Do you want to have an ideagasm?

[vortexring 0]

Your analogy is as utter wank as your earlier reply which I pointed my answer out to you:

''I got as far as you claiming that I've an assumption that all religions are perfect and decided to end reading your pish right there and then.

Because I didn't make that assumption.

Behave yerself!'


Stop trying to be what you perceive as manly - you're about as manly as a pussy in a cock contest.

Apply yourself to the point - and then we can advance.

'for it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "chuck 'im out, the brute!" But it's "saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot.'

[jakee 1,648]

Quote

Your analogy is as utter wank as your earlier reply which I pointed my answer out to you:

Why is it wank? You haven't shown it to be wrong.

Quote

''I got as far as you claiming that I've an assumption that all religions are perfect and decided to end reading your pish right there and then.

Because I didn't make that assumption.

Behave yerself!'

Problem is, you say that here, but you demonstrate time and time again that it is not the case. You always blame bad things that religion has caused on 'misuse'. Every single time. You use it as a shield that stops you from ever having to think about the possibility that there might be something fundamentally wrong with what religion is. If you're saying that I'm wrong, then fucking demonstrate it. Give an example of where you think religion might have caused something bad without having been 'misused'. Whatever the fuck that actually means.

[quade 4]

Gentlemen . . . locking it and giving you both 24 hours to think over your last few posts.

quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver