0
SpeedRacer

Isn't it kind of stupid to bash "liberals" or "liberalism"

Recommended Posts

EGAD.. dont suggest that....its all the fringe right has and its the foundation of their religion. Most of them have been brought up on it by right wing hate radio since the early 90's. Lush Rimjobs success has been based on painting ANYONE who does not follow their NEO CON religion as a"liberal.

In the Lush Rimjob , Micheal " Hatemonger" Savage and Glen "Loonytoons" Beck' rather black and white world.. there is only the "CONSERVATIVE" world filled with love and apple pie and mom... and the liberals.. filled with rage and hate and no patriotism. There is no room for moderation in THEIR world.

Its the greatest use of George Orwells doublespeak EVER foisted on the world.>:(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't need to bash liberalism, their track record speaks volumes. Social programs cracking under the weight of bureaucracy in Europe, Canada and America's largest cities. Costs for education and healthcare choked because of well-meaning, but misguided liberal policies that hinder development and real creative thinking, and choice.

Given that, I simply challenge the ideas and hope the light begins to shine in...

...it will eventually. ;)

:P

So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aw come on Jeanne...I don't think you're a lib...I just think you're mad...

...just never really sure at whom though...

...ever since that day I picked you up at the airport in Phoenix in 03... :P;):D:)


:ph34r:B|;):P

edited because I misspelled your name and I don't want you to be mad at me...though it would be entertaining to read the creative names you might come up with for me...:)

So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

EGAD.. dont suggest that....its all the fringe right has and its the foundation of their religion. Most of them have been brought up on it by right wing hate radio since the early 90's. Lush Rimjobs success has been based on painting ANYONE who does not follow their NEO CON religion as a"liberal.



Don't upset the liberal. But feel free to call any conservative a neo con.

I'm a conservative southern boy with a great family, a strong marriage, and a steady income. I believe in God and support the President no matter what party he's from. Good lord, I'm a fucking crazy ass neo con.

--------------------------------------------------
Stay positive and love your life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It doesn't matter what "type" of liberalism you're into...the basic premise is that "government should take care of you because you're not capable of doing it yourself".

We've had 50+ years of government handouts and what has it gotten us? Take a drive into any innercity neighborhood near you and take a good look around. That is, if you have the balls to go.

I'll bet most people on this board haven't been near those areas in a long time, if ever. Go see what your dollars have been spent on...see the effects of "government taking care of it's citizens".
Please don't dent the planet.

Destinations by Roxanne

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

We've had 50+ years of government handouts and what has it gotten us? Take a drive into any innercity neighborhood near you and take a good look around. That is, if you have the balls to go.



That is only because we haven't taken enough from the corporations and small business owners that provide the jobs, innovation, and economic force in this company.

We need to take more from them, make bigger social programs, bigger government. :S

The double speak refrence is ironic... I heard the democrats are going to increase the chocolate ration if Obama is elected.
"The restraining order says you're only allowed to touch me in freefall"
=P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes.

In addition to pointing out that radical Islamists are the antithesis of liberalism, the track record of liberalism has afforded the world individual rights, rule of law (versus Divine right of Kings), freedom of speech, freedom of reading material, market economics, the concept of private property, child labor laws, decrease in poverty rates (compare poverty rates of the 1800s in the US when estimates range from 50-75%+ of nation living in poverty to the last 50 years when it varies ~8-12%; decrease in poverty correlates with decrease in crime & increase in GDP), veterans benefits (e.g., Roosevelt’s original GI Bill) … & the weekend. Those are all products of liberalism.

VR/Marg

Act as if everything you do matters, while laughing at yourself for thinking anything you do matters.
Tibetan Buddhist saying

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


compare poverty rates of the 1800s in the US when estimates range from 50-75%+ of nation living in poverty to the last 50 years when it varies ~8-12%; decrease in poverty correlates with decrease in crime & increase in GDP.... Those are all products of liberalism.



Please explain how liberalism is responsible for the increase in GDP that has been the root cause of all the great improvements in this country.

Liberal policies are almost allways in direct conflict with prevailing economic theories.
"The restraining order says you're only allowed to touch me in freefall"
=P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

It doesn't matter what "type" of liberalism you're into...the basic premise is that "government should take care of you because you're not capable of doing it yourself".



That's akin to saying that the basic premise of conservatism is to line the pockets of big business through fraud
and to start wars to which other people's children are sent to fight and die as canon fodder. Neither description is accurate.


Quote

We've had 50+ years of government handouts and what has it gotten us? Take a drive into any innercity neighborhood near you and take a good look around. That is, if you have the balls to go.



No balls. Ovaries, perhaps. :P
Did a 4 mile walk through inner city Atlanta this morning.


Quote

I'll bet most people on this board haven't been near those areas in a long time, if ever.



Lived in South Central Los Angeles during the 1992 riots. When I Washington DC I frequently stay in northeast quad, near North Capitol NE.

There are parts of Tokyo & Moscow in which I hesitate to walk alone.

I've also been to urban and rural areas of India, Nepal, and Mexico and seen the poverty there. When one compares the US to those areas or to much of sub-Saharan Africa, the US has done very well over the last 75 years since Pres Roosevelt introduced the New Deal. And frankly, we should. Hold the bar high for ourselves, rather than lower it.

My question is how many people (1) have seen rural and urban povery outside of the US and seen the deleterious impact on those nations, I'm confident there are quite a few; how that group intersects/overlaps with the most outspoken critics of western liberalism is unknown) and (2) how many people remember or have any knowledge of history of what the US was like in the 1930s?

VR/Marg

Act as if everything you do matters, while laughing at yourself for thinking anything you do matters.
Tibetan Buddhist saying

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

compare poverty rates of the 1800s in the US when estimates range from 50-75%+ of nation living in poverty to the last 50 years when it varies ~8-12%; decrease in poverty correlates with decrease in crime & increase in GDP.... Those are all products of liberalism.



Please explain how liberalism is responsible for the increase in GDP that has been the root cause of all the great improvements in this country.



That statement has multiple assumptions that are not proven … & may not be valid.

Is rise in GDP the root cause of all great improvements in this country? Or is the rise in GDP a result of choices and structures that have been made by the US? The stronger case is for the vector of causality to be for the latter. (E.g., what is the correlation btw investment in science & engineering and resulting new technology and increases in GDP? see Vannevar Bush’s now-famous ‘Science: The Endless Frontier.”)

But the question of “does a decrease in poverty correlate with a rise in GDP” is underlying your response (or at least I’m going to pull that question out).

Fundamentally, how does GDP grow? (1) Have more people working and (2) have people work more efficiently. When large percentages (really large, e.g., >50%) of people are in poverty or dependent on subsistence income, one doesn’t get a rise in GDP. To the contrary, high poverty rates generally combined with other elements can push a GDP to be negative or even a state to brink of failure, e.g., Economists have long known and have empirical evidence that reducing rampant poverty correlates with increase in GDP. That’s the underlying principal of Pres Bush’s Millennium Challenge Corporation.

The policy issue is how does one induce reduction in poverty: possible policy options range from kill/poison/eat/deport the poor (overall poverty is reduced but it’s probably not viable as a blatant policy) through efforts to stimulate economic growth (which has commensurate “hows? – education, trickle down economics, rise minimum raise, increase or decrease taxes on certain groups, targeted investment, etc) to (limited to massive) redistribution of wealth to income caps.

You may also want to compare US GDP from any year in the 1800s to any year after 1938 to see the positive impact.

The larger question for the 21st Century US, im-ever-ho, is what percentage of the population can the US afford to not have contributing and still economically grow?


Quote

Liberal policies are almost allways in direct conflict with prevailing economic theories.



What do you think is the prevailing economic theory?

Since the day of Adam Smith, liberal economic theories have prevailed in the capitalistic world.

VR/Marg

Act as if everything you do matters, while laughing at yourself for thinking anything you do matters.
Tibetan Buddhist saying

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Liberal policies are almost allways in direct conflict with prevailing economic theories.



What do you think is the prevailing economic theory?

Since the day of Adam Smith, liberal economic theories have prevailed in the capitalistic world.

VR/Marg



Liberal economic theories do not equate to liberal political/socialist ideals.

Adam Smith's being the "founder" of free market economics has been possible, in fact, only from limiting government intervention.
So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

It doesn't matter what "type" of liberalism you're into...the basic premise is that "government should take care of you because you're not capable of doing it yourself".



That's akin to saying that the basic premise of conservatism is to line the pockets of big business through fraud
and to start wars to which other people's children are sent to fight and die as canon fodder. Neither description is accurate.


Quote

We've had 50+ years of government handouts and what has it gotten us? Take a drive into any innercity neighborhood near you and take a good look around. That is, if you have the balls to go.



No balls. Ovaries, perhaps. :P
Did a 4 mile walk through inner city Atlanta this morning.

How's it looking to you? How many boarded up crack houses did you pass? I'm sure your "walk" had something to do wth MLK. Do you think he'd be impressed with the progress?

Quote

I'll bet most people on this board haven't been near those areas in a long time, if ever.



Lived in South Central Los Angeles during the 1992 riots. When I Washington DC I frequently stay in northeast quad, near North Capitol NE.

You don't live there now though do you. Why is that?

There are parts of Tokyo & Moscow in which I hesitate to walk alone.

I've also been to urban and rural areas of India, Nepal, and Mexico and seen the poverty there. When one compares the US to those areas or to much of sub-Saharan Africa, the US has done very well over the last 75 years since Pres Roosevelt introduced the New Deal. And frankly, we should. Hold the bar high for ourselves, rather than lower it.

My question is how many people (1) have seen rural and urban povery outside of the US and seen the deleterious impact on those nations, I'm confident there are quite a few; how that group intersects/overlaps with the most outspoken critics of western liberalism is unknown) and (2) how many people remember or have any knowledge of history of what the US was like in the 1930s?

During a depression? Hardly a suitable comparison.

Why are we talking about living conditions outside the US? I'm assuming your point is to say it's better here. That's kind of like being the lead car in the funeral procession. Liberal government give away programs are a miserable failure. Not the only one for sure but I always chuckle when I see the poor backing the Dems. Yep, it's working out really good for them.

VR/Marg

Please don't dent the planet.

Destinations by Roxanne

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Liberal policies are almost allways in direct conflict with prevailing economic theories.



What do you think is the prevailing economic theory?

Since the day of Adam Smith, liberal economic theories have prevailed in the capitalistic world.



Liberal economic theories do not equate to liberal political/socialist ideals.



Socialist does not equal liberal. That is just as in err as saying conservative equals fascist. Neither is correct and it limits useful dialogue.


Quote

Adam Smith's being the "founder" of free market economics has been possible, in fact, only from limiting government intervention.



Adam Smith's work is liberal economic theory.

Before Smith, the predominant belief was that without poverty people would not want to work and that everyone would be lazy and pursue leisure (as did many aristocrats who owned virtually all of the property -- because remember before liberalism the concept of private property was extremely limited). The predominant view among English conservatives at Smith's time was that the poor were poor because God meant them to be so. It's also connected to Protestant work ethic, i.e., God looked with favor upon people of wealth and success in business.

Otoh, Smith, asserted that more wealth to common people would benefit the nation's economy and society as a whole - the invisable hand. He proposed market economics as the economic policy to accomplish that. Smith proposed *limited* intervention not *no* intervention.

VR/Marg

Act as if everything you do matters, while laughing at yourself for thinking anything you do matters.
Tibetan Buddhist saying

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Socialist does not equal liberal.



Not in literal terms, but the reality is otherwise. The liberal political mindset now consistently seeks to funnel as much as possible through government oversight, regardless of mandate.

The argument could be made that "true" communism is in fact very conservative. However, as you point out it's a matter of perspective.

Quote

Quote

Adam Smith's being the "founder" of free market economics has been possible, in fact, only from limiting government intervention.



Adam Smith's work is liberal economic theory.



I don't dispute that, I said that liberal economic theory does not equate to liberal political theory.

Quote

He proposed market economics as the economic policy to accomplish that. Smith proposed *limited* intervention not *no* intervention.



That's what I said...
So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Did a 4 mile walk through inner city Atlanta this morning.



How's it looking to you? How many boarded up crack houses did you pass? I'm sure your "walk" had something to do wth MLK.



Nope, had nothing to do with MLK.
Zero boarded up crack houses.


Quote

Quote

Quote

I'll bet most people on this board haven't been near those areas in a long time, if ever.



Lived in South Central Los Angeles during the 1992 riots. When I Washington DC I frequently stay in northeast quad, near North Capitol NE.



You don't live there now though do you. Why is that?



Job. Don't live in the suburbs, rural area, Outer Mongolia, or Oslo either.


Quote

Quote

My question is how many people (1) have seen rural and urban povery outside of the US and seen the deleterious impact on those nations, I'm confident there are quite a few; how that group intersects/overlaps with the most outspoken critics of western liberalism is unknown) and (2) how many people remember or have any knowledge of history of what the US was like in the 1930s?



During a depression? Hardly a suitable comparison.



I disagree. It is *the* single most apt comparision.

I would argue that it's the lack of cognizance of history -- our own history -- that underlies much of the argument against the New Deal programs.


Quote

Why are we talking about living conditions outside the US?



In order to have cogniznance of what the situation is like in states lacking the institutions and infrastructure of the US and western world. That's what it looks like.

VR/Marg

Act as if everything you do matters, while laughing at yourself for thinking anything you do matters.
Tibetan Buddhist saying

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>I don't need to bash liberalism, their track record speaks volumes.

Yeah. Those idiot libs that got rid of slavery didn't think for a second about all those poor farmers they destroyed. Typical. And the Bill of Rights! I suppose the liberals that came up with that nonsense thought everyone would just join hands and sing KumBayAh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Adam Smith's being the "founder" of free market economics has been possible, in fact, only from limiting government intervention.



Adam Smith's work is liberal economic theory.


I don't dispute that, I said that liberal economic theory does not equate to liberal political theory.

What do you think liberal political theory is?

Thus far most (all?) of the criticism in this thread have re-stated a single, innacurate highly partisan aphorism.


Conservative political theory does not equate to liberal economic theory. Both political theories are subsets of the liberal economic theory. In the 1980s, economic policy wonks of the conservative political movement adapted/adopted neo-liberalism.


Quote

He proposed market economics as the economic policy to accomplish that. Smith proposed *limited* intervention not *no* intervention.



That's what I said...

Then why did you disagree with me? :P

That's what liberal policies espouse. Late 20th/early 21st Century conservative policies want less or none.

VR/Marg

Act as if everything you do matters, while laughing at yourself for thinking anything you do matters.
Tibetan Buddhist saying

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I don't need to bash liberalism, their track record speaks volumes. Social programs cracking under the weight of bureaucracy in Europe, Canada and America's largest cities. Costs for education and healthcare choked because of well-meaning, but misguided liberal policies that hinder development and real creative thinking, and choice.

Given that, I simply challenge the ideas and hope the light begins to shine in...

...it will eventually. ;)

:P




As discussed in other threads, liberalism freed the slaves, fought the Britts and gave Rosa Parks the right to sit on the bus. Liberalism made/makes this country great, unless you like Republican Naziism.

I agree with the rest, keep shoveling off trillions to our military when there is no enemy and shun social programs where there is dire need - it makes great sense to me.:S

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

EGAD.. dont suggest that....its all the fringe right has and its the foundation of their religion. Most of them have been brought up on it by right wing hate radio since the early 90's. Lush Rimjobs success has been based on painting ANYONE who does not follow their NEO CON religion as a"liberal.



Don't upset the liberal. But feel free to call any conservative a neo con.

I'm a conservative southern boy with a great family, a strong marriage, and a steady income. I believe in God and support the President no matter what party he's from. Good lord, I'm a fucking crazy ass neo con.



I'm sure you supported Clinton....whatever

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

It doesn't matter what "type" of liberalism you're into...the basic premise is that "government should take care of you because you're not capable of doing it yourself".

We've had 50+ years of government handouts and what has it gotten us? Take a drive into any innercity neighborhood near you and take a good look around. That is, if you have the balls to go.

I'll bet most people on this board haven't been near those areas in a long time, if ever. Go see what your dollars have been spent on...see the effects of "government taking care of it's citizens".




Are you joking? Last 50 years have yielded handouts to the military indust complex maybe, not social svs, esp the last 30.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I'll bet most people on this board haven't been near those areas in a long time, if ever. Go see what your dollars have been spent on...see the effects of "government taking care of it's citizens".

What tax dollars? They're going to the military complex and the debt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

We've had 50+ years of government handouts and what has it gotten us? Take a drive into any innercity neighborhood near you and take a good look around. That is, if you have the balls to go.



That is only because we haven't taken enough from the corporations and small business owners that provide the jobs, innovation, and economic force in this company.

We need to take more from them, make bigger social programs, bigger government. :S

The double speak refrence is ironic... I heard the democrats are going to increase the chocolate ration if Obama is elected.



Yea, that trickle down thing is great....worked so well for Hoover and Reagan, not to mention Bush.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

As discussed in other threads, liberalism freed the slaves, fought the Britts and gave Rosa Parks the right to sit on the bus.



Concur strongly.


Quote

Liberalism made/makes this country great, unless you like Republican Naziism.



[:/] While I have no doubt that there exist among the 90M or so Republicans (or conservatives) in the US a few who do espouse Nazi ideas/neo-Aryan/anti-government ideas, the overwhelmingly vast majority don't. [:/]

VR/Marg

Act as if everything you do matters, while laughing at yourself for thinking anything you do matters.
Tibetan Buddhist saying

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0