0
kallend

McCain's energy policy

Recommended Posts

Quote

Crisscrossing the country over the last two weeks to promote his energy plans, Sen. John McCain promised a forceful national strategy to combat global warming and end U.S. dependence on foreign oil.

"We must steer far clear of the errors and false assumptions that have marked the energy policies of nearly 20 Congresses and seven presidents," the presumptive Republican nominee told a crowd of oil executives in Houston.




Oh oh.. there goes Marc's vote

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Inconsistency in policy is a direct reflection of allowing corporations to rule the roost. Corporate America chases dollars, whichever way the dollars happen to be flying at the moment. At every turn, at each change in wind direction, those same corporations are buying our politicians and telling them exactly how to represent the corporations. The politicians are nothing more than spin-doctors that tell the people that they are acting in our best interest.

A true representative politician would have a consistent policy; a policy that the electoral population understood and voted for (once every four years!), and would adhere to that policy in the name of the populations that they represent.
Trapped on the surface of a sphere. XKCD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dude...it's the LA Times. Of course they'll site Sen. McCain's faults and inconsistencies. :S:P

They'll do the same for Sen. Obama, but then they'll vindicate it as the path of a growing intellectual...

So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote
yeah. And check out his new ride>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/29/us/politics/29plane.html?_r=1&oref=slogin 20 K per fillup[:/]
I hold it true, whate'er befall;
I feel it, when I sorrow most;
'Tis better to have loved and lost
Than never to have loved at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


I wonder if he'll get the same treatment Hillary got:

www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=3188621#3188621
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


At least it's carrying an entire staff, and not just one person...or flying himself around to lecture on GW...
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


At least it's carrying an entire staff, and not just one person...or flying himself around to lecture on GW...
Just pointing out a fact. Just like Gore, Edwards et al, I sure wouldn't wanna pay their elec. bills. ALL politicians are a bunch of liars and thieves just pandering for the sheeps vote.;):P I'm loyal to myself.;)
I hold it true, whate'er befall;
I feel it, when I sorrow most;
'Tis better to have loved and lost
Than never to have loved at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


$20K per fill-up? You kidding? It's got a 5,300 gallon capacity, roughly 37,000 lbs. Jet A at a conservative $6.50/gal $35K...

Don't get all glum about it...it's not a solo team on a Gulfstream V, flying around at higher altitudes telling everyone to give up on their lifestyle...then returning to a mansion that consumes more resources now, than a year ago, despite "greening"...:S
So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh
Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright
'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life
Make light!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>flying around at higher altitudes telling everyone to give up on their
>lifestyle...

Actually he is doing just that. He wants a 60% cut in CO2 emissions by 2050 - which, if you go by the Gorebaiters here, means freezing in the dark.

>then returning to a mansion that consumes more resources now, than a
>year ago, despite "greening" . . .

Whereas McCain flies between his NINE mansions valued at well over 13 million.

But I have a feeling you will use the same rhetorical talent you used to condemn Gore for his emission of CO2 to excuse McCain's - despite his threatening to impose exactly the sort of CO2 reductions you condemn Gore for.

It will be interesting to see which of the people who condemned Gore will turn out to really be opposed to the sort of climate change legislation that Gore and McCain are pushing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Uh oh....someone dissed the Goreacle ®

I was unaware that McCain was flying around to various global warming summits and telling everyone how they'd have to tighten their belts (figuratively speaking), while the energy consumption at his house *increased*.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>I was unaware that McCain was flying around to various global warming
>summits and telling everyone how they'd have to tighten their belts
>(figuratively speaking)

And I was unaware that Gore was saying he would use his authority as president to make mandatory cuts in your CO2 emissions!

Are you swinging towards the "regulations are better than voluntary compliance" side of things, Mike?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>I was unaware that McCain was flying around to various global warming
>summits and telling everyone how they'd have to tighten their belts
>(figuratively speaking)

And I was unaware that Gore was saying he would use his authority as president to make mandatory cuts in your CO2 emissions!

Are you swinging towards the "regulations are better than voluntary compliance" side of things, Mike?



Odd... I thought Gore said he'd sign Kyoto as President....
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>I thought Gore said he'd sign Kyoto as President....

And I was unaware he was running! You must be more up on current events than I am.

No matter. What's important is that you now support a candidate who will pledge to reduce CO2 emissions. I see that as progress.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

>I thought Gore said he'd sign Kyoto as President....

And I was unaware he was running! You must be more up on current events than I am.

No matter. What's important is that you now support a candidate who will pledge to reduce CO2 emissions. I see that as progress.



You're the one that used "Gore" and "president".

I don't recall EVER saying we didn't need to reduce CO2, Bill... but that DOES seem to be the default assumption whenever someone brings up questions about AGW
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Weren't you left wingers up in arms when GWB tried to make a national energy strategy early in his presidency?

Out of morbid curiosity...


:)



That's different - just like it's different talking about the Crawford ranch having a heat pump instead of normal a/c, tile heatsinks, cistern rainwater catchment and graywater irrigation.

It's ok, though... Al purchases carbon credits to offset heating his swimming pool.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0