hairyjuan 0 #1 June 26, 2008 Source: "The Queen's Death Star" by Lauren Moret, 26 February 2006; The Sunday Times online, UK, 19 February 2006 DEPLETED URANIUM FROM GULF WAR II DETECTED IN ATMOSPHERE AND AIR FILTERS IN BRITAIN The UK Sunday Times reported on a shocking scientific study authored by British scientists Dr. Chris Busby Saoirise Morgan: "did the Use of Uranium Weapons in Gulf War 2 result in Contamination in Europe? Evidence from the measurements of the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE), Aldermaston, Berkshire, UK. The Atomis Weapons Establishment was established years ago to measure the radioactive emissions from British nuclear power plants and atomic weapons facilities. Three years ago it was taken over by Halliburton, which refused at first to release air monitoring data, as required by law, to Dr. Busby. An international expert on low-level radiation, Busby serves as an official adviser on several British government committees, and on committee on Radiation Risk (ECRR), for European Parliament. He eventually obtained the 2003 data from the Defence Procurement Agency. The fact that the air monitori ng data was circulated by Halliburton/AWE to the Defence Procurement Agency that it was considered to be relevant, and that Dr. Busby was Stonewalled because Halliburton/AWE clearly recognised that it was a serious enough matter to justify a government interpretation of the results, and official decisions had to be made about what data would show and their political implications for the military. In a similar circumstance in 1992 Major Doug Rokke, the DIRECTOR for the Depleted Uranium Cleanup Project after Gulf War I, was ordered by a US Army general to write a no-bid contract, "Depleted Uranium, Contaminated Equipment, and Facilities Recovery Plan Outline", for the procedures for cleaning up Kuwait, including depleted uranium, Kellog, Brown, and Root (KBR), a subsidiary of Halliburton. The contract/proposal was passed through Madeline Albright, the Secretary of State, to the Emirate of Kuwait, which considered the terms and then hired KBR for the clean-up. Aldermaston is one of many nuclear facilities throughout Europe that regularly monitor levels of radiation transported by atmospheric sand and dust storms or air currents from radiation sources in North Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia. After the "Shock and Awe" campaign in Iraq in 2003, very fine particles of depleted uranium were captured with larger sand and dust particles in filters in Britain. These particles of depleted uranium travelled in seven to nine days from Iraqi battlefields as far as 2400 miles away. The radiation measured in the atmosphere quadrupled within a few weeks of the beginning of the 2003 campaign, and at one of the five monitoring locations the levels twice required an official alert from the British Environment Agency. In addition to depleted uranium data gathered in previous studies in Kosovo and Bosnia by Dr Busby, the Aldermaston air monitoring data provide a continuous record of depleted uranium levels in Britain from other recent wars. Extensive video footage of the 2003 Iraq war, including Fallujah in 2004, provides IRREFUTABLE DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE that the US has unethically and illegally depleted uranium on ciities and other civilian populations. These military actions are in direct violation not only of international conventions but also of US military law because the US is a signatory to the Hague and Geneva Conventions and the 1925 Geneva Gas Protocol. Depleted uranium weaponry meets the definition of a WEAPON of MASS DESTRUCTION (WMD) in two out of three categories under USC Title 50, chap 40, SECTION 2302. 'This research shows that rather than remaining near the target as claimed by the military, depleted uranium weapons contaminate both locals and whole populations hundreds to thousands of miles away,' Dr Busby said. www.video.google.com/videosearch?=the+doctor+the+depleted+uranium+and+the+dying+children&sitesearch=+we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively wishers never choose, choosers never wish Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hairyjuan 0 #2 June 26, 2008 look at this www.youtube.com/watch?v=WD94xT6h3c www.youtube.com/watch?=L_RqKBU&feature=relatedwe are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively wishers never choose, choosers never wish Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hairyjuan 0 #3 June 26, 2008 no one wants to debate, guess the cat got your tonguewe are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively wishers never choose, choosers never wish Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #4 June 26, 2008 Quoteno one wants to debate, guess the cat got your tongue I suspect that if you link to credible sources that make similar claims, people might consider it worthy of their time. Internet videos don't qualify as credible sources.Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 3,118 #5 June 26, 2008 > no one wants to debate, guess the cat got your tongue Well, if it's HairyJuan style debate you want, then http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,268081,00.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7m782SdcQU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1FeEezee4s Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #6 June 26, 2008 Quote> no one wants to debate, guess the cat got your tongue Well, if it's HairyJuan style debate you want, then http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,268081,00.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7m782SdcQU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1FeEezee4s That's cheating. Your links actually went to videos.Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hairyjuan 0 #7 July 2, 2008 Tiltle 50, Ch 40, Sec 2302 is as crediible as you could possibly want. I found it MY town's library, You can too!we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively wishers never choose, choosers never wish Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hairyjuan 0 #8 July 3, 2008 here is Executive Order 13286, aLso available from local library, Reference section. Most likely place, if you've never been there [/url]www.13moon.com[url]we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively wishers never choose, choosers never wish Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #9 July 3, 2008 QuoteTiltle 50, Ch 40, Sec 2302 is as crediible as you could possibly want. I found it MY town's library, You can too! I agree, it's a credible source. However, it doesn't support your claim in any way. [/crazy] Did you actually read it first? TITLE 50 - WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE CHAPTER 40 - DEFENSE AGAINST WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION Sec. 2302. Definitions In this chapter: (1) The term "weapon of mass destruction" means any weapon or device that is intended, or has the capability, to cause death or serious bodily injury to a significant number of people through the release, dissemination, or impact of - (A) toxic or poisonous chemicals or their precursors; (B) a disease organism; or (C) radiation or radioactivity. (2) The term "independent states of the former Soviet Union" has the meaning given that term in section 5801 of title 22. (3) The term "highly enriched uranium" means uranium enriched to 20 percent or more in the isotope U-235. (Pub. L. 104-201, div. A, title XIV, Sec. 1403, Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2717.) REFERENCES IN TEXT This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title XIV of div. A of Pub. L. 104-201, Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2714, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title XIV to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2301 of this title and Tables.Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #10 July 3, 2008 Quote here is Executive Order 13286, aLso available from local library, Reference section. Most likely place, if you've never been there Dude, that is not Executive Order 13286. Do you even look at the references you cite? Here is Executive Order 13286. Please, read it and tell us what section(s) are relevant to your point.Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jasmin 0 #11 July 4, 2008 Don't feed the troll...although its amazing everybody's lasted this long! xj "I wouldn't recommend picking a fight with the earth...but then I wouldn't recommend picking a fight with a car either, and that's having tried both." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites