0
JohnRich

I'm Voting Democrat

Recommended Posts

A thank-you letter from Barack Obama:

My fellow Americans:

As your future President I want to thank my supporters, for your mindless support of me, despite my complete lack of any legislative achievement, my pastor's relations with Louis Farrakhan and Libyan dictator Moamar Quadafi, or my blatantly leftist voting record, while I present myself as some sort of bi-partisan agent of change.

I also like how my supporters claim my youthful drug use and criminal behavior somehow qualifies me for the Presidency, after 8 years of claiming Bush's youthful drinking disqualifies him. Your hypocrisy is a beacon of hope shining over a sea of political posing.

I would also like to thank the Kennedy's for coming out in support of me. There's a lot of glamor behind the Kennedy name, even though JFK started the Vietnam War, his brother Robert illegally wiretapped Martin Luther King, Jr. and Teddy killed a female employee with whom he was having an extra-marital affair and who was pregnant with his child. And I'm not going anywhere near the cousins, both literally and figuratively.

And I'd like to thank Oprah Winfrey for her support. Her love of meaningless empty platitudes will be the force that propels me to the White House.

Americans should vote for me, not because of my lack of experience or achievement, but because I make people feel good. Voting for me causes some white folks to feel relieved of their imagined, racist guilt. I say things that sound meaningful, but don't really mean anything because Americans are tired of things having meaning. If things have meaning, then that means you have to think about them. Americans are tired of thinking. It's time to shut down the brain, and open up the heart.

So when you go to vote, remember, don't think, just do. And do it for me.

Thank You.
Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote


Got your militia membership in order yet???



By definition, we're already militia :P


Perhaps by some, but certainly not by any legal one.


Wow... US Code Title 10 is illegal? Whodathunk...
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote


Got your militia membership in order yet???



By definition, we're already militia :P


Perhaps by some, but certainly not by any legal one.


Wow... US Code Title 10 is illegal? Whodathunk...


I'm guessing that at least JR is over 45.

I assume that Scooby's "we" may have just included him and JR, but if he meant "we" as in "all citizens of the US," then he's way off the mark.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote


Got your militia membership in order yet???



By definition, we're already militia :P


Perhaps by some, but certainly not by any legal one.


Wow... US Code Title 10 is illegal? Whodathunk...


I'm guessing that at least JR is over 45.

I assume that Scooby's "we" may have just included him and JR, but if he meant "we" as in "all citizens of the US," then he's way off the mark.


You may wish to look at Title 32, 313 - it could be argued that former members of the military are eligible up to age 64.

*Edit - Regardless, there is no legal requirement that I have ever heard of or seen mentioned in various places that SPECIALIZE in issues concerning constitutional law connected to the 2nd Amendment that even come CLOSE to bringing any sort of argument into play in regards to invalidation due to age.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The inference in your first post that the only militias that Scooby or JR could belong to would be 'illegal' is, frankly, disgusting.



Yeah, so why would YOU do that? Or do you also not understand what the word "infer" means?

What -I- was speaking about was that at least JR, but certainly a lot of folks that read this thread (possibly including Scooby I dunno, but definitely not Amazon) don't meet the qualifications for the "unregulated militia" implied by Article 1 Section 8 of the United States Constitution. Further, that should have been perfectly clear to anyone that followed the like to the article on Wikipedia I had placed.

If you want to infer that somehow means they'd then naturally join domestic terrorist groups masquerading as phony state militias, then yes, that certainly is shameful of you.

While I may disagree with a lot of what JR has ever said, I do not consider him to be a domestic terrorist.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why? Maybe your attitude towards those that see the preservation of the 2nd Amendment as a key issue.

It's not so far a stretch to believe that someone who likes calling gun owners "rambo" and other derogatory terms would also believe that the same gun owners would go to some sort of 'illegal' militia.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


It's not so far a stretch to believe that someone who likes calling gun owners "rambo" and other derogatory terms would also believe that the same gun owners would go to some sort of 'illegal' militia.



I believe a lot of people (the majority actually) are completely delusional on several topics, that doesn't mean I think they're terrorists.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


It's not so far a stretch to believe that someone who likes calling gun owners "rambo" and other derogatory terms would also believe that the same gun owners would go to some sort of 'illegal' militia.



I believe a lot of people (the majority actually) are completely delusional on several topics, that doesn't mean I think they're terrorists.



That's certainly reassuring... care to explain how you came to the conclusion that an unorganized militia as noted in USC 10 would be illegal - or how voluntary association with said militia, even though outside of the normal range limits, would be illegal?
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

That's certainly reassuring...



I aim to please. ;)

Quote


care to explain how you came to the conclusion that an unorganized militia as noted in USC 10 would be illegal - or how voluntary association with said militia, even though outside of the normal range limits, would be illegal?



No, because it's not even relevant to what I was talking about! YOU brought it up; not me. Why don't YOU explain it?

FFS Mike to you really get your jollies in these little side tracking pieces of crap YOU bring up?
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

That's certainly reassuring...



I aim to please. ;)

Quote


care to explain how you came to the conclusion that an unorganized militia as noted in USC 10 would be illegal - or how voluntary association with said militia, even though outside of the normal range limits, would be illegal?



No, because it's not even relevant to what I was talking about! YOU brought it up; not me. Why don't YOU explain it?

FFS Mike to you really get your jollies in these little side tracking pieces of crap YOU bring up?



You're the one that brought up the subject - YOU explain it. I took it to mean either the membership was illegal or the milita was. I disputed the illegal membership issue based on the US Code I mentioned above and have edited my post.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I took it to mean either the membership was illegal or the milita was. I disputed the illegal membership issue based on the US Code I mentioned above and have edited my post.



Well, that's YOUR problem then; isn't it?

I'm not going to attempt to explain YOUR faulty reasoning.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I took it to mean either the membership was illegal or the milita was. I disputed the illegal membership issue based on the US Code I mentioned above and have edited my post.



Well, that's YOUR problem then; isn't it?

I'm not going to attempt to explain YOUR faulty reasoning.



Incorrect - it is the duty of the WRITER to make sure that the meaning is his communication is clear - yours was not.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sorry pal. My writing is perfectly clear to those that are willing to read what I write and not make silly assumptions.

I can't be blamed for your inability to read and comprehend. Sorry.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I see the Far Right Wing is going into overdrive.
Got your militia membership in order yet???



No, but my sense of humor still works.
I'm sorry that you're having difficulty with yours.



I'm certain it doesn't apply to you, but as the election approaches, the 'patriots' will grace us with lots of gentle 'humor' essentially because they are not really allowed to scream ..."NO FUCKIN WAY MY AMERICA IS GONNA HAVE A NIGGER IN THE WHITEHOUSE"!!!
-----------------------
"O brave new world that has such people in it".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I see the Far Right Wing is going into overdrive.

Got your militia membership in order yet???



That's 2 in 2 days I've seen from the Right Wing Liars' Group. I expect they'll soon be claiming Obama deserted from a Swift Boat.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Sorry pal. My writing is perfectly clear to those that are willing to read what I write and not make silly assumptions.

I can't be blamed for your inability to read and comprehend. Sorry.



Nice PA, Mr. Moderator

In what world is "Perhaps by some, but certainly not by any legal one." a clear and effective communication?

Pretty lame for a staff officer.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0