Scott McClellan Interview...... <<<crickets>>> Come on guys you can attack him like the rest of the fringe right.

[idrankwhat 0]

Quote

You would have a valid point if he was trying to sell the source as non-partisan on one particular issue he agrees with. Instead, he acknowledged the partisanship and used it to emphasize his point.

Blues,
Dave

This was a pretty good interview that touched heavily on that point. It's worth the listen if you get the chance and are interested.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=91061991

[kallend 2,147]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Funny how you're so rah-rah on the place when it agrees with you, Professor.

Gotta love those situational ethics.

I think you failed to detect the sarcasm, since "bastion of commie-pinko-liberal-socialism" was too subtle for you.

I think you don't see the irony of using a source you complained about being partisan once it agrees with you...as I said - more situational ethics, but nothing unusual.

You would have a valid point if he was trying to sell the source as non-partisan on one particular issue he agrees with. Instead, he acknowledged the partisanship and used it to emphasize his point.

Blues,
Dave

I think Mike is trying to tell us that as well as having a partisan and distorted interpretation of the data, he believes the Heritage Foundation is also fabricating the data

...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

[mnealtx 0]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Funny how you're so rah-rah on the place when it agrees with you, Professor.

Gotta love those situational ethics.

I think you failed to detect the sarcasm, since "bastion of commie-pinko-liberal-socialism" was too subtle for you.

I think you don't see the irony of using a source you complained about being partisan once it agrees with you...as I said - more situational ethics, but nothing unusual.

You are really misusing the term, situational ethics here. Situational ethics has to do with applying a given moral imperative differently in different situations. It has nothing to do with whether you blindly follow or blindly disagree with a certain media source. There's nothing wrong with acknowledging that the sources you usually disagree with get it right once in a while.

Hmm... you may be right, since he's still on the "it's all Bush's fault" bandwagon regardless of the source.

My apologies, Professor - you weren't using situation ethics.

Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

[mnealtx 0]

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Funny how you're so rah-rah on the place when it agrees with you, Professor.

Gotta love those situational ethics.

I think you failed to detect the sarcasm, since "bastion of commie-pinko-liberal-socialism" was too subtle for you.

I think you don't see the irony of using a source you complained about being partisan once it agrees with you...as I said - more situational ethics, but nothing unusual.

But since you're such a fan, now... I'm guessing you don't disagree with this, this, this and this, then?

You confuse data with opinion. I agree with their raw data. Their interpretations of the data and their opinions are so clearly wrong that even a Republican should be able to see the errors.

Maybe the difference between data and opinion is also too subtle for you?

Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

[TheAnvil 0]

ROFLMFAO. Well well. It looks as if jet lag, not looking at this data for some time, and my own spreadsheets' format got the better of me. EJC did produce a budget surplus for three of eight vice two of eight years. I glanced at the wrong column. Oh darn. BFD.

The national debt did not decrease once during his tenure - or after for that matter - so as executed there was no surplus for any of them.

Maybe if health care were socialized, we further punish US corporations for success, we increase taxes, make SOX a bit harsher, make it easier for workers to unionize and harder for them to disestablish unions, and we allow the NEA to design a national education bill and pass it sans change, that would balance the budget. I think not.

Non-discretionary spending that will hit us in the near future has been a problem allowed to metastasize over the past several decades. Congress and not the president has the power of the purse, FYI.

Vinny the Anvil
Post Traumatic Didn't Make The Lakers Syndrome is REAL
JACKASS POWER!!!!!!