Scott McClellan Interview...... <<<crickets>>> Come on guys you can attack him like the rest of the fringe right.
By
Amazon, in Speakers Corner
Recommended Posts
kallend 2,146
QuoteNo. Clinton did not do it first. Well, some things he did.
Bush, Jr. took what Clinton did politically and improved and expanded it.
Clinton merely took from Bush, Sr., and improved and exanded it.
Bush, Sr. improved upon Reagan.
Reagan improved upon Carter.
Carter - he's an exception. He did things differently. The last idealist we've had in office.
Ford - let's forget about him.
Nixon - took what LBJ did to the limit.
LBJ - shall we continue?
Vinnie is right, Professor.
Since when is "he/she did it first" an excuse for unacceptable behavior? Bush Jr's unacceptable behavior is worse than any predecessor since Nixon. In addition to which he's an incompetent.
Bush Jr's legacy will be:
Interminable war entered under false pretenses,
Failure to catch public enemy #1,
US Dollar at all time low,
US credibility at all time low,
Traditional allies pissed off with us,
Zero or negative progress on environmental issues,
Trade deficit at all time high,
National Debt at all time high by large margin,
Failed education program,
Failure to achieve his "#1 priority" (SS reform),
Millions of high paying jobs exported,
Wider gap between rich and poor Americans
Failure to achieve immigration reform,
Endorsement of torture as official US policy,
Tapping American's phones without a warrant,
Evading Constitutional protections by shipping suspected undesirables to secret overseas prisons,
Imprisonment of US citizens without trial,
"Signing statements",
Overriding FOI Act as one of his first actions as president.
Other than that, his administration has been just great.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
jcd11235 0
QuoteSince when is "he/she did it first" an excuse for unacceptable behavior? Bush Jr's unacceptable behavior is worse than any predecessor since Nixon. In addition to which he's an incompetent.
Bush Jr's legacy will be:
Interminable war entered under false pretenses,
Failure to catch public enemy #1,
US Dollar at all time low,
US credibility at all time low,
Traditional allies pissed off with us,
Zero or negative progress on environmental issues,
Trade deficit at all time high,
National Debt at all time high by large margin,
Failed education program,
Failure to achieve his "#1 priority" (SS reform),
Millions of high paying jobs exported,
Wider gap between rich and poor Americans
Failure to achieve immigration reform,
Endorsement of torture as official US policy,
Tapping American's phones without a warrant,
Evading Constitutional protections by shipping suspected undesirables to secret overseas prisons,
Imprisonment of US citizens without trial,
"Signing statements",
Overriding FOI Act as one of his first actions as president.
Other than that, his administration has been just great.
So what you're saying is, except for his foreign policy and his domestic policy, President Bush has not been responsible for any spectacular failures as President? That sounds reasonable.
mnealtx 0
Oh, snap!
QuoteMR. McCLELLAN: And, David, we very much appreciate his service. That's the President's view. We appreciate his service. Again, I think I would say what I said a minute ago, that while I certainly haven't seen the book, I've just seen what you all have seen, but it just appears to be more about trying to justify personal views and opinions than it does about looking at the results we're achieving on behalf of the American people. And that's where the President is going to keep his focus, on the results we're trying to accomplish for the American people.
Oh, snap redux
QuoteMR. McCLELLAN: Well, why, all of a sudden, if he had all these grave concerns, did he not raise these sooner? This is one-and-a-half years after he left the administration. And now, all of a sudden, he's raising these grave concerns that he claims he had. And I think you have to look at some of the facts. One, he is bringing this up in the heat of a presidential campaign. He has written a book and he certainly wants to go out there and promote that book. Certainly let's look at the politics of it. His best buddy is Rand Beers, who is the principal foreign policy advisor to Senator Kerry's campaign. The Kerry campaign went out and immediately put these comments up on their website that Mr. Clarke made.
But of course, with HIM (McLellan) it's just DIFFERENT....
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
jcd11235 0
mnealtx 0
"some critical reading skills", I believe it was?
What does the Press Secretary serving at the convenience of the President have to do with the quotes above?
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
TheAnvil 0
Read the post above yours. Memo's in gov't are written daily - thousands of them unclassified. Most of them never see press. I believe a more salient query would be why would left wingers living in a 007-esque fantasy world of conspiracy would think the contents of a single memo or conversation with any government official would end up in the press.
Iced tea is the choice drink of liberals trying to avoid facts. You should try it! It worked well for Al Gore...after that excuse he was on a Presidential ticket! Iced tea for ALL my liberal friends!
Post Traumatic Didn't Make The Lakers Syndrome is REAL
JACKASS POWER!!!!!!
TheAnvil 0
Friedman's recent book, in addition to a bit of reading on economics, would be superb reading for you, Sir John. THE WORLD IS FLAT 'tis the name. Good read. Perhaps sitting in on a fellow professor's entry level econ courses would clear a few things up. Not sure if I recommended them to you, but The Economist and Foreign Affairs would be superb publications to start reading. Replace moronic TIME or NEWSWEEK with The Economist and Foreign Affairs is but a pittance per quarter. Very good reading.
You'll find many conservatives and libertarians enraged by the current state of affairs and by some of this administrations performances in many areas. It's quite bewildering that you think we'd abandon all sense and principle because of that, however.
i disagree with you that this administration is sleazier than El Jefe Clintonista's. Do you REALLY want to go into iced tea, Rose Law firm records, Pauline Kanchalachak, and the like? Could go on for a long time and nothing productive would come of it. THink as you like - I always do. And drink up on the iced tea. Be like Al Gore! He was a vice president and almost president, you know.
You completely miss my point, by the way. McClellan has a SUPERB point that the constant campaign mentality pervading DC is a cancer. A poor deal for the nation. Set your partisanship aside for a second and think on that for a bit. Left wingers are so giddy and right wingers so angry that this point is being lost. It's a good point that has rarely been brought up publicly - and it should be brought up repeatedly.
Post Traumatic Didn't Make The Lakers Syndrome is REAL
JACKASS POWER!!!!!!
jcd11235 0
QuoteWhat does the Press Secretary serving at the convenience of the President have to do with the quotes above?
The Press Secretary is an official voice for the Office of the POTUS. D you really believe that they can speak freely, speak their conscience?
It's amazing how many former Cabinet members of this administration have since come forward and spoken more candidly. Do you think that's a coincidence?
Your links don't indicate anything except that McClellan took his professional responsibility seriously. His book indicates he also takes his integrity seriously now that he is able to speak candidly and truthfully about his experience in the White House.
mnealtx 0
QuoteYou completely miss my point, by the way. McClellan has a SUPERB point that the constant campaign mentality pervading DC is a cancer. A poor deal for the nation.
Agreed, and well said. It's been said in other posts before, but it's evident that politicians are more interested in the next campaign and soundbites that will make then look good to the voters than doing what is right.
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
TheAnvil 0
They're busy campaigning and not leading. Some afraid to do something unpopular. I honestly think EJC...er...WJC was the worst I can remember. GWB CLEARLY isn't scared to do something unpopular, though Lord knows he's in constant campaign mode sometimes. Stupid steel tariff thing during his first term, for instance - DUMB DUMB DUMB DUMB DUMB.
Post Traumatic Didn't Make The Lakers Syndrome is REAL
JACKASS POWER!!!!!!
jcd11235 0
QuoteRead the post above yours. Memo's in gov't are written daily - thousands of them unclassified. Most of them never see press. I believe a more salient query would be why would left wingers living in a 007-esque fantasy world of conspiracy would think the contents of a single memo or conversation with any government official would end up in the press.
I have no idea. You'll have to ask a "left winger living in a 007-esque fantasy world of conspiracy" to get that answer. You'll probably find him in a cantina somewhere arguing over warm beer with a right wing nut-case who believes that Suddam posed an imminent threat to the United States.
QuoteIced tea is the choice drink of liberals trying to avoid facts.
It doesn't appear that I am the one trying to avoid facts.
mnealtx 0
QuoteQuoteWhat does the Press Secretary serving at the convenience of the President have to do with the quotes above?
The Press Secretary is an official voice for the Office of the POTUS. D you really believe that they can speak freely, speak their conscience?
It's amazing how many former Cabinet members of this administration have since come forward and spoken more candidly. Do you think that's a coincidence?
Your links don't indicate anything except that McClellan took his professional responsibility seriously. His book indicates he also takes his integrity seriously now that he is able to speak candidly and truthfully about his experience in the White House.
Ok.... so BEFORE, he was lying about everything but NOW he's telling the truth? All this proves is that he is STILL willing to lie for money (I suppose it helps when you have Soros bankrolling your publisher, too). Where was this vaunted integrity of his when he was in office, and if he was SO troubled by all this, why did he wait so long to leave?
This proves nothing but that you are a poor judge of character, if you only start believing someone when they agree with you. (Also applicable to the media bias conversation, come to think of it)
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
jcd11235 0
QuoteFriedman's recent book, in addition to a bit of reading on economics, would be superb reading for you, Sir John. THE WORLD IS FLAT 'tis the name. Good read. Perhaps sitting in on a fellow professor's entry level econ courses would clear a few things up. Not sure if I recommended them to you, but The Economist and Foreign Affairs would be superb publications to start reading. Replace moronic TIME or NEWSWEEK with The Economist and Foreign Affairs is but a pittance per quarter. Very good reading.
You'll find many conservatives and libertarians enraged …
LOL. I hope you can appreciate the irony of implying Kallend needs a better understanding of economics, and then referencing how Libertarians currently feel enraged.
jcd11235 0
QuoteOk.... so BEFORE, he was lying about everything but NOW he's telling the truth? All this proves is that he is STILL willing to lie for money (I suppose it helps when you have Soros bankrolling your publisher, too). Where was this vaunted integrity of his when he was in office, and if he was SO troubled by all this, why did he wait so long to leave?
He wasn't knowingly lying then, either. He was telling the press what he was being told to tell them.
QuoteThis proves nothing but that you are a poor judge of character, if you only start believing someone when they agree with you. (Also applicable to the media bias conversation, come to think of it)
No, I don't think I'd be inclined to have him in my circle of friends before or after he resigned. However, I, unlike you, apparently, am objective enough to understand that just because someone disagrees with me does not mean they're lying.
In the media discussion, since you brought it up, you made an assertion and then you were unable to support that assertion with primary data. It didn't mean you were lying. I'm sure you believe the media has a liberal bias, considering the far-right viewpoint you have (if your posts on this forum are any indication).
mnealtx 0
Far right viewpoints? Compared to most of the leftist posters in the forum, I suppose that's true. It also helps explain why you see no bias in the media...why, that's how things are SUPPOSED to be!
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
Bush, Jr. took what Clinton did politically and improved and expanded it.
Clinton merely took from Bush, Sr., and improved and exanded it.
Bush, Sr. improved upon Reagan.
Reagan improved upon Carter.
Carter - he's an exception. He did things differently. The last idealist we've had in office.
Ford - let's forget about him.
Nixon - took what LBJ did to the limit.
LBJ - shall we continue?
Vinnie is right, Professor.
My wife is hotter than your wife.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites