0
happythoughts

religious tolerance in the news

Recommended Posts

Quote

Quote

You seem to misunderstand what I wrote. I asked, "Are you defining God as the universe (i.e. God = universe = God)?" In other words, God is the universe, no more, no less (i.e. a natural god). That is significantly different than defining god as the creator of the universe (i.e. a supernatural god), an idea for which there is absolutely no supporting evidence. By the defining god as the universe, No creature could be any closer to god than any other creature, including Jesus Christ, if he actually existed.



My personal view is that the universe with all of its physical laws is a visible manifestation of God. The universe is self aware, because God is self aware. It is the Physical part of God that gives the Spiritual a means of contact and expression. Like our bodies being the vehicle of our spiritual being. The perfect Nature of God is reflected in His manifested universal creation. The freedom He bestowed on us has been repaid by our corruption of His perfect creation.



You're free to believe that. However, that is a profoundly different concept than the one to which I referred. Your statement:

Interesting. Since this is one of God's attributes, it appears that you are simply exchanging personal viewpoints of what God is or isn't.

is incorrect, or, at the very least, extremely misleading. The comparison that was made is similar to comparing a cake at your local grocery store to a bakery referenced in a fictional novel.

Quote

As far as evidence, it surrounds us and speaks for itself.



Yet, amazingly, no one has ever been able to produce any in support of a supernatural god. One would think that if so much evidence for such a thing surrounds us, then someone would make the effort to point it out.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

The same thing which gave you life in your mothers womb also gave you desires which only it can fill. That is, only life can fill you with life.



Only life can fill you with life? Ok, after you've printed that out and stuck it into your "My First Truism" book could you explain just what it is that is supposed to mean, and how it has any relevance at all to an argument in favour of the existence of god?
Quote



Life is invisible and full of power and energy. We dont have life because we are alive, we are alive because we have life. Life itself is more miraculous than anything, it is the greatest gift we have, sacred and uniquely special to all it hosts, and that makes it good. When one makes the connection that life is good, then it takes what is good to connect with it in its favorite state. Love is that connection, not just the giving, but the recieving as well, and though someone can give you love all your life, it is your heart which must trust and believe in that love to recieve it. When you recieve love, life is inspired that much more, therefore, it takes (what is good in) life, to fill us with life.


Quote

Just look at nature, life has wisdom.



What does that mean? What do you mean when you say wisdom?



Wisdom, not in our traditionally defined sense of the word. When you look at instincts in nature, nature shows wisdom; when you see life evolve with its surroundings, life shows wisdom. Now humans have the greatest ability to recieve wisdom, and even with our greatest minds in collaboration, everything we learn through education and searching comes down to a foundation of truth. Like panning for gold...Wisdom is the foundation. Man will only prove wisdom, as wisdom was here first. But there is something greater than even wisdom, thanks to Jesus, I believe it is love. There is a common misconception that Jesus is a pansy because he is full of love, yet love takes more courage than anything.

Nature shows us an extreme amount of care, beauty, reliablility, provision, even at the destruction and wrath it brings, it shows more care than anything. That connection shows the nature of wisdom to posess care, and therefore love. I didnt make that connection until Jesus, and when I did, my entire perception changed and indeed is changing still as love continues to soften my once calloused heart.

The Gospel..."May they be ever seeing, but never percieving, ever hearing but never understanding becasue this peoples heart has become calloused"
"We didn't start the fire"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Life is invisible and full of power and energy. We dont have life because we are alive, we are alive because we have life. Life itself is more miraculous than anything, it is the greatest gift we have, sacred and uniquely special to all it hosts, and that makes it good. When one makes the connection that life is good, then it takes what is good to connect with it in its favorite state. Love is that connection, not just the giving, but the recieving as well, and though someone can give you love all your life, it is your heart which must trust and believe in that love to recieve it. When you recieve love, life is inspired that much more, therefore, it takes (what is good in) life, to fill us with life.



What are you babbling about? I have, quite honestly, absolutely no clue what you are saying. The words are definitely english, but beyond that I have no idea what language you think you are speaking.

Would it be possible, just once, to get a straightforward, intelligible sentance out of you?
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

What about truth? If there are immutable laws of physics, they surely operate under the truth right, yet it seems you can have truth without physics. So the law wouldnt necessarily be about physics, but about the greater truth in physics, making truth greater than even the laws of physics. Surely truth would meddle in even the affairs of man.



What the hell are you talking about?

"True" is a word we use to tag a piece of information that is correct, "False" is another word we use to tag a piece of information that is not correct.

If you ask me the question "What is 2+2" I would give the answer "4" and that would be true. That does not mean that some sort of entity called truth has guided me to the correct answer, just that I know some basic addition.

Honestly, you can't just pick words at random and then argue by definition and common usage that these words must represent supernatural forces that have an objective existence.:S


What makes something true to us is called proof. Without proof there is nothing true to us. However, proof only expsoses truth, therefore truth is the foundation of proof. Before you knew what 2+2 even was, truth was there. Just because you havent found proof, doesnt mean that there is not the truth underneath. I mean, you use physics and mathematics all the time to prove truth. How do you not see that truth is greater? And if truth is greater then it must be universal, and if it is universal and we are in the universe, then truth would apply, beyond mathematics and physics to the very nature of our being, perhaps even in ways that havent been "proven" or even "seen" yet?

Instead of looking at God as just some sort of random entity. Look at what truth is, and what wisdom is, look at the greater invisible qualities of the human spirit, those which inspire, and desire to share and be shared. Look at what is good and right, look at the power of fear. Look at life in all its beauty, creativity, and passion. Look at everything, then look inside yourself and see that you are not seperate of anything, but are a part of everything. On the surface, you feel as if you are in the sky, but in truth you are a part of it as the same power which bore the sky and set its limits is the same power which gave you life and desired you to connect with it. The ego is what gets in the way of us seeing that we are merely a drop in the ocean. The ocean isnt beautiful becasue of us, we are beautiful becasue of the ocean. The same with love. Love isnt beautiful becasue of us, we are beautiful becasue of love.
"We didn't start the fire"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

What makes something true to us is called proof. Without proof there is nothing true to us. However, proof only expsoses truth, therefore truth is the foundation of proof. Before you knew what 2+2 even was, truth was there. Just because you havent found proof, doesnt mean that there is not the truth underneath. I mean, you use physics and mathematics all the time to prove truth. How do you not see that truth is greater? And if truth is greater then it must be universal, and if it is universal and we are in the universe, then truth would apply, beyond mathematics and physics to the very nature of our being, perhaps even in ways that havent been "proven" or even "seen" yet?



How do you not see that you're applying Argumentum ad Dictionary? You can't use the definition of the word truth to prove that truth exists as an entity that pervades the universe. Hell, as arguments go this one deserves to be added to The List;

True things are true, therefore God exists!
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Life is invisible and full of power and energy. We dont have life because we are alive, we are alive because we have life. Life itself is more miraculous than anything, it is the greatest gift we have, sacred and uniquely special to all it hosts, and that makes it good. When one makes the connection that life is good, then it takes what is good to connect with it in its favorite state. Love is that connection, not just the giving, but the recieving as well, and though someone can give you love all your life, it is your heart which must trust and believe in that love to recieve it. When you recieve love, life is inspired that much more, therefore, it takes (what is good in) life, to fill us with life.



What are you babbling about? I have, quite honestly, absolutely no clue what you are saying. The words are definitely english, but beyond that I have no idea what language you think you are speaking.

Would it be possible, just once, to get a straightforward, intelligible sentance out of you?


:D:D Ok. I never claimed to be intelligent, but what exactly would you like to hear. I am quite surprised that you got nothing out of that, oh well, at least you made me laugh a bit!

Look at it mathematically. I am going to assume that you like your life and think life is good. So..

xlife=xgood therefore xgood=xlife.:D
"We didn't start the fire"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

What makes something true to us is called proof. Without proof there is nothing true to us. However, proof only expsoses truth, therefore truth is the foundation of proof. Before you knew what 2+2 even was, truth was there. Just because you havent found proof, doesnt mean that there is not the truth underneath. I mean, you use physics and mathematics all the time to prove truth. How do you not see that truth is greater? And if truth is greater then it must be universal, and if it is universal and we are in the universe, then truth would apply, beyond mathematics and physics to the very nature of our being, perhaps even in ways that havent been "proven" or even "seen" yet?



How do you not see that you're applying Argumentum ad Dictionary? You can't use the definition of the word truth to prove that truth exists as an entity that pervades the universe. Hell, as arguments go this one deserves to be added to The List;

True things are true, therefore God exists!


:D
"We didn't start the fire"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Wisdom, not in our traditionally defined sense of the word.



Could you please start using words in the context of their traditional definitions and meanings? It would definitely promote intelligent dialog.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Wisdom, not in our traditionally defined sense of the word.



Could you please start using words in the context of their traditional definitions and meanings? It would definitely promote intelligent dialog.



Am I trying to promote intelligent dialogue? Perhaps we are all inspiring one another to think, which is never a bad thing. If you want wordly intelligence, talk to a professor. My perception is of the spirit. Why is it that man, who we have just proven was not here before the earth, claims to have all the definitions of life? Didnt we already agree that perceptions are different? Many people understand exactly what I am saying. It is ok for us to disagree on things.
"We didn't start the fire"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Am I trying to promote intelligent dialogue?



Apparently not.

Quote

Perhaps we are all inspiring one another to think, which is never a bad thing.



Perhaps we might be if some of us would stop making up new definitions of words as we go along, without stating those new definitions.

Quote

If you want wordly intelligence, talk to a professor.



I do that daily, and the dialogs actually are meaningful.

Quote

My perception is of the spirit.



What is that? An undiscovered and undefined sixth sense?


Quote

Why is it that man, who we have just proven was not here before the earth, claims to have all the definitions of life?



Because a definition is a human construct.

Quote

Didnt we already agree that perceptions are different? Many people understand exactly what I am saying.



Many might be a bit of an extreme overstatement.

Quote

It is ok for us to disagree on things.



Absolutely, but it would be much more meaningful to disagree disagree on points, and not whether or not we should create brand new definitions for words in order to support assertions that are largely non-supportable.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yet, amazingly, no one has ever been able to produce any in support of a supernatural god. One would think that if so much evidence for such a thing surrounds us, then someone would make the effort to point it out.***

It is quite easy when you embrace the concept that reality may not be exactly as you have
envisioned it. I have read numerous personal opinions from physicists regarding quantum mechanics and general relativity that the universe is put together in a very unexpected way and that forth coming discoveries will probably exceed our wildest imagination. Seeing how 94% of the matter and energy that make up the universe is still unknown, and that there is the possibility of 7 more undiscovered dimensions.
______________________________________

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

It is quite easy when you embrace the concept that reality may not be exactly as you have
envisioned it. I have read numerous personal opinions from physicists regarding quantum mechanics and general relativity that the universe is put together in a very unexpected way and that forth coming discoveries will probably exceed our wildest imagination. Seeing how 94% of the matter and energy that make up the universe is still unknown, and that there is the possibility of 7 more undiscovered dimensions.



Absolutely, there is still more for physicists to understand. That does not mean that there is any likelihood of finding evidence of a supernatural creator. You're creating a false dichotomy, much like the one creationists created (no pun intended) with their false evolution/ID dichotomy. If evolution were to be absolutely disproved tomorrow, that would not mean that ID is suddenly a scientifically valid explanation. The same concept applies to cosmology. Just because cosmologists don't know with any certainty about critical points in the universe's past or future does not imply evidence for a supernatural creator.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

True things are true, therefore God exists!



...Upon further thought...

It should say, "true things are true, therefore truth exists"



Do you know what begging the question means?
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

True things are true, therefore God exists!



...Upon further thought...

It should say, "true things are true, therefore truth exists"



Do you know what begging the question means?



No. But I suppose you will say it means something like Ive already given the answer inside the question. Thats not my intent. My intent is to sincerely ask what he believes to be greater than man. Is that not a fair question?
"We didn't start the fire"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A thread about religious tolerance and conflicts.
Some are between believers and non-believers.
Some are between different religions.

Most religions think that they have "The Truth" and spend some time trying to convert non-believers.
The non-believers don't really enjoy it.

Then, they get fairly serious when someone, who is already in the religion business, challenges their flavor of The Truth.

I understand now. :ph34r:
Not the religion part, just the being irritated part.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Most religions think that they have "The Truth" and spend some time trying to convert non-believers.
The non-believers don't really enjoy it.
Quote



I dont know where your getting this conversion thing. I dont even like that word. It does absolutely no good to "convert" anyone who doesnt truly desire to be "converted", so I dont spend my time trying to convert anyone. I bring you the truth of the Gospel and if anything, there is just as much "conversion" technique going on with non-believers. If my intent were to use deceptive persuasion to coax someone into "conversion" then it would be obvious considering the company here. But its not obvious, becasue my intent is not deceptive. This is what I truly believe and it comes from my heart. I try hard to practice the truth of the Gospel. I am not operating alone, I am, in the sight of God, relaying the message of the Gospel the way it was given to me. It doesnt change the fact that there is something inherintly true in the universe. Contrary to popular belief, I have done some research on other religions that claim truth. I think truth pretty much speaks for itself.

"We didn't start the fire"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

True things are true, therefore God exists!



...Upon further thought...

It should say, "true things are true, therefore truth exists"



Do you know what begging the question means?



No. But I suppose you will say it means something like Ive already given the answer inside the question.



That is essentially what it means. You are using your conjecture to prove your conjecture. The problem with begging the question is that it allows one to reach logically invalid, erroneous conclusions.

Quote

Thats not my intent. My intent is to sincerely ask what he believes to be greater than man. Is that not a fair question?



Which man? Greater in what sense? Has a greater mass? Has a greater height? Has a greater volume? Has a greater temperature? Has a greater carbon content? What quantitative property of many does this particular thing you are looking for need to have more of than man? If you are talking about qualitative properties, greater than doesn't make much sense, since the answer will be purely subjective.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Ok. I never claimed to be intelligent, but what exactly would you like to hear. I am quite surprised that you got nothing out of that, oh well, at least you made me laugh a bit!



That! A sentance that can actually be understood! Now if you can transform your arguments into a similarly plain english format we might be able to get somewhere.
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

True things are true, therefore God exists!



...Upon further thought...

It should say, "true things are true, therefore truth exists" Truth is greater than us. What do you believe is greater than man?



What is 'greater'? Bigger? More powerful? More important?

If I think certain causes or concepts, or living by certain standards of moral behaviour are more important than my own life, does that mean I think they actually have objective existence somewhere? no. Would I call them greater than myself? Maybe.
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

True things are true, therefore God exists!



...Upon further thought...

It should say, "true things are true, therefore truth exists" Truth is greater than us. What do you believe is greater than man?



What is 'greater'? Bigger? More powerful? More important?

If I think certain causes or concepts, or living by certain standards of moral behaviour are more important than my own life, does that mean I think they actually have objective existence somewhere? no. Would I call them greater than myself? Maybe.



When I say greater and you guys ask me how, I believe it answers my question. Nevertheless, there are things that bind a man and things that free a man, both are greater than man.
"We didn't start the fire"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites