Recommended Posts
jcd11235 0
QuoteNope.. but I DO know who my enemies are...
Couldn't find any posts to back up your claims, I guess?
QuoteI wont shed a tear for them at all till they try to make a lasting peace and get their own country to run the way they want.
Yet, when they show a willingness to make peace, it is Israel and the US who stand in the way because Carter held talks with Hamas, who are in power legitimately and democratically.
Amazon 7
They selected the terrorist organization and support them in their war to obliterate Israel....too bad.. so sad.
They talked with Carter... good for them.. maybe something will come of it...
But if you TRUELY believe they want peace you are smokin some very expensive stuff that is causeing some interesting hallucinations.
THEIR avowed purpose is to end the occupation.. that includes ALL of what they consider to be Palestine. The 1967 borders to START talking is so much smoke and mirrors... it would never happen.
They were the ones about to attack the State of Israel in 1967 with massive armies from all sectors around Israel... and they got their asses kicked by a VASTLY outnumbered army and airforce.... they dont learn verry well.
jcd11235 0
QuoteThen the stupid fucks who voted them into office need to suffer the consequences of their poor choices.
I suppose you feel that it would be justifiable for the United States to be attacked for voting in Bush?
QuoteThey selected the terrorist organization and support them in their war to obliterate Israel....too bad.. so sad.
Too bad Hamas' willingness to work towards peace is inconsistent with your opinion.
QuoteThey talked with Carter... good for them.. maybe something will come of it...
As long as the White House and Israel don't stand in the way of peace, it does have potential benefits.
QuoteBut if you TRUELY believe they want peace you are smokin some very expensive stuff that is causeing some interesting hallucinations.
Remember, it's Israel that won't step up to the table to negotiate peace.
QuoteTHEIR avowed purpose is to end the occupation.. that includes ALL of what they consider to be Palestine. The 1967 borders to START talking is so much smoke and mirrors... it would never happen.
Yeah. How unreasonable to suggest that the internationally recognized borders be recognized by Israel.

Amazon 7
QuoteI suppose you feel that it would be justifiable for the United States to be attacked for voting in Bush?
The American People voted the stupid fuck into office... and the American people and their children.. and their childrens children will be paying the price of his fuckups.
QuoteRemember, it's Israel that won't step up to the table to negotiate peace.
Bullshit.. they were getting close when the Palestinians started the Intefada... remember???
QuoteYeah. How unreasonable to suggest that the internationally recognized borders be recognized by Israel.
THe Palestinians and most of the Arab States do not recognize those borders from 1948 even.. they want Israel gone.. or dont you get that....guess not.
jcd11235 0
QuoteQuoteRemember, it's Israel that won't step up to the table to negotiate peace.
Bullshit.. they were getting close when the Palestinians started the Intefada... remember???
With some degree of reluctance and some uncertainty about the reception my book would receive, I used maps, text and documents to describe the situation accurately and to analyze the only possible path to peace: Israelis and Palestinians living side by side within their own internationally recognized boundaries. These options are consistent with key U.N. resolutions supported by the U.S. and Israel, official American policy since 1967, agreements consummated by Israeli leaders and their governments in 1978 and 1993 (for which they earned Nobel Peace Prizes), the Arab League's offer to recognize Israel in 2002 and the International Quartet's "Roadmap for Peace," which has been accepted by the PLO and largely rejected by Israel. (emphasis mine --jcd11235)
-- Pres. Jimmy Carter
Don't let the truth stand in the way of your rhetoric.
Amazon 7
They gave Israel an Ultimatum.. not a real proposal..
To negotiate for peace you have to do it in good faith.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/30/world/middleeast/30saudi.html
But Deputy Prime Minister Shimon Peres appeared on the Arab satellite channel Al Jazeera to encourage Arab and Israeli leaders to hold direct talks on peace. “Let’s sit together as we are supposed to and work on it as we did before with Egypt, Jordan and the Palestinians,” he said.
Arab leaders bristled at the Israeli reaction. “This does not express a positive stand of a country that wants peace,” said Prince Saud al-Faisal, the Saudi foreign minister.
Amr Moussa, secretary general of the Arab League, told reporters, referring to the
QuoteDon't let the truth stand in the way of your rhetoric.
Don't let the truth stand in the way of your rhetoric.
jcd11235 0
QuoteTo negotiate for peace you have to do it in good faith.
True. The Arabs had an offer for peace talks on the table for five years, yet Israel didn't want to sit down.
Amazon 7
QuoteTrue. The Arabs had an offer for peace talks on the table for five years, yet Israel didn't want to sit down.
Try READING the article.....the truth will set you free
jcd11235 0
QuoteQuoteTrue. The Arabs had an offer for peace talks on the table for five years, yet Israel didn't want to sit down.
Try READING the article.....the truth will set you free
I did, but apparently you only took one quote out of context. Besides, Carter is more credible than the NYT.
The reactions of the Palistinian people on 9/11 showed me yet again who they are...fuck them
I wont shed a tear for them at all till they try to make a lasting peace and get their own country to run the way they want.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites