worlds smallest gun

[akarunway 1]

My question is> How do you pull the trigger? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=526655&in_page_id=1770

I hold it true, whate'er befall;
I feel it, when I sorrow most;
'Tis better to have loved and lost
Than never to have loved at all.

[kschilk 0]

Whuddya' need a trigger for? Everybody knows that guns fire radomly and by their own will. Just wait and see, one of those li'l things is gonna' get loose and then....there'll be dead ants and cockraoches (if their armor isn't too thick) everywhere!

"T'was ever thus."

[BIGUN 1,488]

I'd be willing to wager some money that it'd make it thru TSA screening.

Nobody has time to listen; because they're desperately chasing the need of being heard.

[Misternatural 0]

>>"powerful enough to kill at close range"


so is a rock, which is a hell of a lot cheaper.

Beware of the collateralizing and monetization of your desires.
D S #3.1415

[kelpdiver 2]

Quote

>>"powerful enough to kill at close range"


so is a rock, which is a hell of a lot cheaper.

Rocks can't self propel, and if you can't rear your shoulder back, you can't give it much momentum.

Seems like you'd have to fire with your pinky, and maybe not even then. But it's a great key chain ornament!

[Misternatural 0]

>>Rocks can't self propel-

ever heard of gravity?

Guns can't self fire either- uh normally, that is.



edited to add that you and I are having a rediculous online discussion....even by my standards

Beware of the collateralizing and monetization of your desires.
D S #3.1415

[Skyrad 0]

Quote

The gun is banned from being imported into the US - because it's barrel is less than three inches, meaning it is deemed too small to qualify for sporting purposes.

Sporting purposes? i thought Americans generally bought shorts for self protection. What do they mean it can't be imported because it doesn't qualify for sporting purposes???

When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy.
Lucius Annaeus Seneca

[shropshire 0]

If you car-jack someone with a gun that they can't see... well it wouldn't be very sporting now, would it? There are rules and standards that one simply must up-hold, don't y'know?

(.)Y(.)
Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome

[mnealtx 0]

The "sporting purposes" bit came about from the GCA '68 - just shows again that the anti-gunners really don't CARE if people have an effective means of defense, as long as they can LOOK like they're doing something about the situation....

Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706

[justinb138 0]

I seriously doubt that gun could kill unless it was shoved in someone's ear and fired - the bullet just doesn't have enough weight to penetrate deeply.

[billvon 3,120]

>Sporting purposes? i thought Americans generally bought shorts for self protection.

I don't think this qualifies for either!