Rookie120 0 #1 February 24, 2008 QuoteWASHINGTON (AP) - Ralph Nader is launching a third-party campaign for president. The consumer advocate made the announcement Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press." He says most Americans are disenchanted with the Democratic and Republican parties, and that none of the presidential contenders are addressing ways to stem corporate crime and Pentagon waste and promote labor rights. Nader also ran as a third-party candidate in the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections. He is still loathed by many Democrats who call him a spoiler and claim his candidacy in 2000 cost the party the election by siphoning votes away from Al Gore in a razor-thin contest in Florida. How many times does his man have to run before he sees his approval rating on what he stands for are extremely low? It is his right to run but damn! I have been to places where I could tell I wasn't really welcomed so I showed myself the door. Maybe he should do the same.If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andrewwhyte 1 #2 February 24, 2008 Maybe it will encourage Ron Paul to run again and it will be a push. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rookie120 0 #3 February 24, 2008 QuoteMaybe it will encourage Ron Paul to run again Oh what a great combo! Combine their votes and they might squeeze out 3% of the vote on election day.If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andrewwhyte 1 #4 February 24, 2008 It kind of shows the wisdom of the French system; first round you vote for the person you really wish would win, second round you face reality and vote for the prick you hate the least. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
akarunway 1 #5 February 24, 2008 Quote Quote Maybe it will encourage Ron Paul to run again Oh what a great combo! Combine their votes and they might squeeze out 3% of the vote on election day. I'd take either one over what options we have now. Maybe throw Ross Perot in the mix too!Yes. I am an "Angry White Man" I hold it true, whate'er befall; I feel it, when I sorrow most; 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rookie120 0 #6 February 24, 2008 QuoteI'd take either one over what options we have now. I feel like I am in that episode of South Park when they had the election and the choice was a Dousche Bag or a Turd Sandwich. None of these asswhipes give me a warm and fuzzy. I cannot believe this is the best we got to run for office.If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #7 February 24, 2008 Serious question here. Which party will he take votes from. And I know he would get some from both but, which party canidate would he hurt? This year I am not sure I really have an idea."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andrewwhyte 1 #8 February 24, 2008 QuoteSerious question here. Which party will he take votes from. And I know he would get some from both but, which party canidate would he hurt? This year I am not sure I really have an idea. He would absolutely hurt Obama the most. Obama gets a lot of support from the unions; Nader is big on labour rights. Obama is the candidate of stickin' it to the man; Nader is all about stickin' it to the man. Obama is questioning free trade; Nader is very much anti-free trade. Ralph Nader running because Obama isn't anti-establishment enough for him is like Jesse Jackson running because Obama isn't black enough for him. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #9 February 25, 2008 QuoteQuoteSerious question here. Which party will he take votes from. And I know he would get some from both but, which party canidate would he hurt? This year I am not sure I really have an idea. He would absolutely hurt Obama the most. Obama gets a lot of support from the unions; Nader is big on labour rights. Obama is the candidate of stickin' it to the man; Nader is all about stickin' it to the man. Obama is questioning free trade; Nader is very much anti-free trade. Ralph Nader running because Obama isn't anti-establishment enough for him is like Jesse Jackson running because Obama isn't black enough for him. Interesting. Probably true. Thanks"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crwtom 0 #10 February 25, 2008 Quote Ralph Nader running because ... same reason as McCain -- 2008 is the last chance to make a stand before the bio clock runs out. Cheers, T ******************************************************************* Fear causes hesitation, and hesitation will cause your worst fears to come true Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #11 February 25, 2008 QuoteQuote Ralph Nader running because ... same reason as McCain -- 2008 is the last chance to make a stand before the bio clock runs out. Cheers, T Ralph Nader is running because he simply cannot bear the thought of being out of the national conversation every few years. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #12 February 25, 2008 QuoteQuote Ralph Nader running because ... same reason as McCain -- 2008 is the last chance to make a stand before the bio clock runs out. Cheers, T I'm sure that's part of it, but I also suspect he is wanting to get a policy concession from the Democratic nominee in exchange for dropping out of the race and giving an endorsement.Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #13 February 25, 2008 Quote I'm sure that's part of it, but I also suspect he is wanting to get a policy concession from the Democratic nominee in exchange for dropping out of the race and giving an endorsement. There's no negotiation at this point - not from the nominee given the history of Florida in 2000, and not from Nader, who doesn't consider the interests of the Party whatsoever. I don't see many votes for him from either party. He had his moment, though not a very successful one. He was one of the many deciders that tipped 2000 to Bush, and yet the Democratic Party still hasn't made changes to keep him from running again in 04 or 08. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #14 February 25, 2008 QuoteThere's no negotiation at this point - not from the nominee given the history of Florida in 2000, and not from Nader, who doesn't consider the interests of the Party whatsoever. While the nominee may not choose to negotiate to keep Nader from staying in, their option indeed remains. Personally, I consider it one of Nader's strengths that he doesn't put the party's interests before the people's.Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tink1717 2 #15 February 25, 2008 Naer will siphon enought votes from the left to insure that the republicans will win the general election. I've often thought that this is a tool that the right uses when they think the'll lose to the left. Skydivers don't knock on Death's door. They ring the bell and runaway... It really pisses him off. -The World Famous Tink. (I never heard of you either!!) AA #2069 ASA#33 POPS#8808 Swooo 1717 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 23 #16 February 25, 2008 Quote Naer will siphon enought votes from the left to insure that the republicans will win the general election. I've often thought that this is a tool that the right uses when they think the'll lose to the left. Ok"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andrewwhyte 1 #17 February 25, 2008 Quote Naer will siphon enought votes from the left to insure that the republicans will win the general election. I've often thought that this is a tool that the right uses when they think the'll lose to the left. So do you think GM is secretly financing him? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rookie120 0 #18 February 25, 2008 QuoteSo do you think GM is secretly financing him? I would love to hear what company is financing him. I cannot see what corporation would give this asshat any money.If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #19 February 25, 2008 Quote I would love to hear what company is financing him. I cannot see what corporation would give this asshat any money. Corporations are not generally inclined to support consumer advocates. He's such an asshat for putting consumers ahead of big business. Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,465 #20 February 25, 2008 On Meet the Press he claimed he would not accept donations from any corporations Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rookie120 0 #21 February 25, 2008 QuoteOn Meet the Press he claimed he would not accept donations from any corporations So he plans on standing on a street corner and talk to anyone who passes him? Does he not see how crazy this looks and how he has 0 chance of winning?If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BillyVance 35 #22 February 25, 2008 I don't know why he does this every four years. Is he really that rich and doesn't have anything else to spend money on? "Mediocre people don't like high achievers, and high achievers don't like mediocre people." - SIX TIME National Champion coach Nick Saban Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jcd11235 0 #23 February 25, 2008 Quote I don't know why he does this every four years. Is he really that rich and doesn't have anything else to spend money on? Or maybe he just takes his civic responsibility more seriously than most.Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #24 February 25, 2008 Quote So he plans on standing on a street corner and talk to anyone who passes him? Does he not see how crazy this looks and how he has 0 chance of winning? Of course he knows he has zero chance of winning. That's not the point for him. He's advocating a viewpoint that the Democrats will not (actively) support. If they keep losing elections, they'll have to adopt some of those platform items. I just don't think that he'll matter this time. I believe voters in close states will choose to pick the Democrat over McCain, and voters in non competitive states like California will give votes to Nader to make some sort of statement. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites