0
TrophyHusband

castro resigns

Recommended Posts

... because there's no need to hold an embargo against a country that we have essentially been in a "pride battle" with for the past 40 or so of those 50 years. There are places that pose an actual threat (or a perceived, 'more' actual threat) that we trade with daily.

It isn't about a beach hotel, it's about free trade with a country that badly needs it.

It's not always about 'what's in it for us,' from a US perspective. Or I guess it is. But it shouldn't be.

The CNN article quoted Bush as stating ""The United States will help the people of Cuba realize the blessings of liberty." ...Vomit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

It isn't about a beach hotel, it's about free trade with a country that badly needs it.

It's not always about 'what's in it for us,' from a US perspective. Or I guess it is. But it shouldn't be.

The CNN article quoted Bush as stating ""The United States will help the people of Cuba realize the blessings of liberty." ...Vomit.



One of the "blessings of liberty" is a free market.
Provoking a reaction isn't the same thing as saying something meaningful.
-Calvin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One of the characteristics of liberty (in an economic sense) is a free market. I know it's semantics, but the 'blessing' thing irks me.

Castro's regime does eliminate a number of freedoms and restricts liberty. But... to play devil's advocate, the US embargo further restricts the possibility of a free market and, therefore, liberty.

No one's helping the situation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

One of the characteristics of liberty (in an economic sense) is a free market. I know it's semantics, but the 'blessing' thing irks me.

Castro's regime does eliminate a number of freedoms and restricts liberty. But... to play devil's advocate, the US embargo further restricts the possibility of a free market and, therefore, liberty.

No one's helping the situation.



Sounds like Bush is willing to try. If he wants to frame it as a blessing, well, I guess it's to be expected. As long as the embargo gets lifted, I can look past semantics.
Provoking a reaction isn't the same thing as saying something meaningful.
-Calvin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

One of the "blessings of liberty" is a free market.



Possibly, but not necessarily.

Liberty itself can be its own dichotomy. A free market implies property rights and freedom from government intervention in the market. Those things, however, do not imply freedom of opportunity or a level playing field. Many believe the latter two characteristics are more important to ensure the blessings of liberty than are the former two characteristics. Others have the opposite opinion.

Personally, I believe that in order to "ensure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity," freedom of opportunity must be preserved. That cannot always be done in a free market.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just knew the sanctions and embargo would eventually force Castro out!:)I hope all those who doubted the wisdom of our administrations will now see the error of their beliefs.:P

"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

WTF do we want an island that for all practical purposes stopped developing in the 50's?



What do you mean "Want an island"? He said "Can we end sanctions?" not "Can we take over?".:S


Also, while maybe they are a minimal threat at best, and economically their market is not the largest, I can't help but think that it might be advantageous to have good relations with a country that sits 90 miles from the United States as opposed to bad relations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

One of the "blessings of liberty" is a free market.



Possibly, but not necessarily.

Liberty itself can be its own dichotomy. A free market implies property rights and freedom from government intervention in the market. Those things, however, do not imply freedom of opportunity or a level playing field. Many believe the latter two characteristics are more important to ensure the blessings of liberty than are the former two characteristics. Others have the opposite opinion.

Personally, I believe that in order to "ensure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity," freedom of opportunity must be preserved. That cannot always be done in a free market.



I don't think anyone is arguing that equal opportunity is not a good thing. Equality of opportunity, however, does not mean equality of results. That is a big sticking point between the left, the right, and us libertarians in the middle.
Provoking a reaction isn't the same thing as saying something meaningful.
-Calvin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Liberty itself can be its own dichotomy. A free market implies property rights and freedom from government intervention in the market. Those things, however, do not imply freedom of opportunity or a level playing field. Many believe the latter two characteristics are more important to ensure the blessings of liberty than are the former two characteristics. Others have the opposite opinion.

Personally, I believe that in order to "ensure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity," freedom of opportunity must be preserved. That cannot always be done in a free market.



Really good, interesting point. But be careful, looks like you're going to get into a Dem/Rep 'what is the government's role' sort of thing...:P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Also, while maybe they are a minimal threat at best, and economically their market is not the largest, I can't help but think that it might be advantageous to have good relations with a country that sits 90 miles from the United States as opposed to bad relations.



I think we agree mostly, but what 'minimal' threats are you referring to? Honestly, i'm just curious

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

a vacation island is the same as "taking over"?
WTF IS there to take over???

:S



You said "Why do we want an island that..."

I have no idea what ending sanctions has to do with "wanting" Cuba?
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nothing specific. I just think that having a government a short flight or boat ride away that hates us is more threatening than not.

I'm not saying that they have the capacity to actually do anything or the desire to even try. However, I'd like to think that it'd be nicer to have a government over there that, if the opportunity to hurt the US in any capacity came up, would decline it rather than relish it.

I don't have any actual evidence of any threat - I was speaking in hypothetical terms more than anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0