Zarkon 0 #26 February 22, 2008 Set in his ways as it pertains the the Constitution yes. Would you rather vote for someone who runs on a pro-choice platform and decides to vote pro-life afterwards? Or for a candidate who runs a non-intervention campaign, then decides they want to police the world after they get in office? I would like to vote for someone who I know will uphold their end of the bargain after elected rather than tell me what I want to hear in order to get my vote. Quote***I think you need to go back to watching Faux. Uh . . . you don't know me very well do you? Wink Nope, I certainly don't. Just saying that sounds like a very Fox or main stream media point of view. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterblaster72 0 #27 February 22, 2008 QuoteSet in his ways as it pertains the the Constitution yes. Would you rather vote for someone who runs on a pro-choice platform and decides to vote pro-life afterwards? Or for a candidate who runs a non-intervention campaign, then decides they want to police the world after they get in office? I would like to vote for someone who I know will uphold their end of the bargain after elected rather than tell me what I want to hear in order to get my vote. Quote***I think you need to go back to watching Faux. Uh . . . you don't know me very well do you? Wink Nope, I certainly don't. Just saying that sounds like a very Fox or main stream media point of view. It's a colossal waste of time discussing Ron Paul with quade. Talk about "bullheaded"... Be humble, ask questions, listen, learn, follow the golden rule, talk when necessary, and know when to shut the fuck up. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterblaster72 0 #28 February 22, 2008 Quote After much research on CONSPIRECY shit Reminds me of this video, brought to you by "Consipracy Shit." Be humble, ask questions, listen, learn, follow the golden rule, talk when necessary, and know when to shut the fuck up. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
