lawrocket 3 #26 February 7, 2008 Bush outsmarted Gore, didn't he? And Bush outsmarted Kerry. So, the choice becomes: 1) Is Bush smarter than he is given credit for; or 2) Do Gore and Kerry fall into the bottom .1% of intellect of the American population? My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #27 February 8, 2008 QuoteBush outsmarted Gore, didn't he? That debate in 2000 probably won't be remembered, not nearly the way that Nixon in 1960 was, but it was one of those factors that pushed the edge over to Bush. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #28 February 8, 2008 QuoteThat debate in 2000 probably won't be remembered, not nearly the way that Nixon in 1960 was, but it was one of those factors that pushed the edge over to Bush. I still think Diebold had more to do with the election than we will ever be allowed to know. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #29 February 8, 2008 QuoteQuoteThat debate in 2000 probably won't be remembered, not nearly the way that Nixon in 1960 was, but it was one of those factors that pushed the edge over to Bush. I still think Diebold had more to do with the election than we will ever be allowed to know. I don't. Gore blew it in so many ways, it should never have been so close that Diebold or a bad ballot design or Naderites could have given the election to Bush. But yeah, I'll oppose any touch voting systems that don't have open architecture and a paper receipt that can be verified after the election. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #30 February 8, 2008 QuoteQuote Nope. His SAT score demonstrates quite clearly that he is more intelligent than the majority of the public. Better than 2 in 3. What he chose to do with that ability is a different matter. reply] You assume that Daddy didn't buy those scores or that he didn't cheat? There is another explanation: http://www.adbuzz.com/bushbuzz.htm"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kelpdiver 2 #31 February 8, 2008 It's not medical, it is deliberate action to differentiate himself from the elite, even though as a member of the Bush family, he certainly is part of it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites lawrocket 3 #32 February 8, 2008 QuoteQuoteThat debate in 2000 probably won't be remembered, not nearly the way that Nixon in 1960 was, but it was one of those factors that pushed the edge over to Bush. I still think Diebold had more to do with the election than we will ever be allowed to know. No, not Bush looking good int he election, nor Gore looking like a buffoon. NO! CAN'T BE! BUSH IS A MORON AND GORE IS A GENIUS! NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! p.s. - NADER is more to blame than anything for Gore loosing it. Don't blame me - I voted for Harry Browne. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites crwtom 0 #33 February 8, 2008 QuoteThe pundits are saying McCain should take Romney as his VP since he has a good conservative base and lots of money. I don't think those two like each other very much. Huckabee seems more the logical choice since he would help McCain carry the South. that's what Huckabee has effectively done - run for vice president. Split the conservative vote to hand the ticket to McCain, give him some more opportunities for publicity by staying in so that they can have a few more "cordial debates" and prove that he can carry the south and religious vote. In the end being perceived as to liberal may not be the biggest problem that McCain will have in the general election -- it is not too hard to make a case that he's the candidate closest to the current prez, who is not exactly popular. Just to name a few - He'll keep the US involved in Iraq longer than any other candidate, and much of his talk indicates he will not shy away from further military engagements. - He promises to appoint conservative judges to the supreme court. - He is been "establishment" longer than any of the other cadidates. - He (self admittedly) knows as little about economy as GWB. - Supported pretty much any initiative of GWB in last 2 year. - etc If it is true that his main strength is his appeal is to independent he is quite vulnerable. Thus far dem's not gone on the attack and tried to make him into "GWB II" - but it is not unlikely this will happen and discourage more than a few "independents". Cheers, T ******************************************************************* Fear causes hesitation, and hesitation will cause your worst fears to come true Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #34 February 8, 2008 QuoteQuote Nope. His SAT score demonstrates quite clearly that he is more intelligent than the majority of the public. Better than 2 in 3. What he chose to do with that ability is a different matter. reply] You assume that Daddy didn't buy those scores or that he didn't cheat? And you automatically assume that he did...Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites TrophyHusband 0 #35 February 8, 2008 what happens to romney's delegates? do they disappear? does he still get the votes at the convention? do they get divided between the remaining candidates? i'm confused. "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites DSE 5 #36 February 8, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuote Nope. His SAT score demonstrates quite clearly that he is more intelligent than the majority of the public. Better than 2 in 3. What he chose to do with that ability is a different matter. reply] You assume that Daddy didn't buy those scores or that he didn't cheat? And you automatically assume that he did... I assume that most significant events in George Bush' early life was bought, stolen, commandeered, fixed, manipulated, whatever. I'm jaded, admittedly. I do like Ryoder's medical example, that could explain a lot. But the callousness he shows towards poverty and lower-class people isn't a byproduct of Alszheimers, it's just a lack of compassion. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #37 February 8, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Nope. His SAT score demonstrates quite clearly that he is more intelligent than the majority of the public. Better than 2 in 3. What he chose to do with that ability is a different matter. reply] You assume that Daddy didn't buy those scores or that he didn't cheat? And you automatically assume that he did... I assume that most significant events in George Bush' early life was bought, stolen, commandeered, fixed, manipulated, whatever. I'm jaded, admittedly. I do like Ryoder's medical example, that could explain a lot. But the callousness he shows towards poverty and lower-class people isn't a byproduct of Alszheimers, it's just a lack of compassion. Lack of compassion? Tax cuts that took something over 10 *MILLION* additional working poor OFF the tax rolls is callous, in addition to a 25% increase in discretionary spending between 2001-2005? You must be working from a different dictionary than I am...Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,148 #38 February 8, 2008 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Nope. His SAT score demonstrates quite clearly that he is more intelligent than the majority of the public. Better than 2 in 3. What he chose to do with that ability is a different matter. reply] You assume that Daddy didn't buy those scores or that he didn't cheat? And you automatically assume that he did... I assume that most significant events in George Bush' early life was bought, stolen, commandeered, fixed, manipulated, whatever. I'm jaded, admittedly. I do like Ryoder's medical example, that could explain a lot. But the callousness he shows towards poverty and lower-class people isn't a byproduct of Alszheimers, it's just a lack of compassion. Lack of compassion? Tax cuts that took something over 10 *MILLION* additional working poor OFF the tax rolls is callous, in addition to a 25% increase in discretionary spending between 2001-2005? You must be working from a different dictionary than I am... Of course, at some time the resultant DEBT will have to be serviced. Seems that, despite the promises from the right, the economy hasn't responded to tax cuts the way we were told it would. So the answer is more "rebates". I wonder when China will foreclose on us.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #39 February 8, 2008 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Nope. His SAT score demonstrates quite clearly that he is more intelligent than the majority of the public. Better than 2 in 3. What he chose to do with that ability is a different matter. reply] You assume that Daddy didn't buy those scores or that he didn't cheat? And you automatically assume that he did... I assume that most significant events in George Bush' early life was bought, stolen, commandeered, fixed, manipulated, whatever. I'm jaded, admittedly. I do like Ryoder's medical example, that could explain a lot. But the callousness he shows towards poverty and lower-class people isn't a byproduct of Alszheimers, it's just a lack of compassion. Lack of compassion? Tax cuts that took something over 10 *MILLION* additional working poor OFF the tax rolls is callous, in addition to a 25% increase in discretionary spending between 2001-2005? You must be working from a different dictionary than I am... Of course, at some time the resultant DEBT will have to be serviced. Seems that, despite the promises from the right, the economy hasn't responded to tax cuts the way we were told it would. So the answer is more "rebates". I wonder when China will foreclose on us. Probably at some point after the Dems tax the businesses into the dirt and ruin the economy again. Too bad they (Congress) think the answer is more spending and not pulling the pigs back from the trough.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,148 #40 February 8, 2008 Quote Too bad they (Congress) think the answer is more spending and not pulling the pigs back from the trough. Finally you realize that Bush and Cheney are "pigs". Pity it took you so long.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rehmwa 2 #41 February 8, 2008 QuoteQuote Too bad they (Congress) think the answer is more spending and not pulling the pigs back from the trough. Finally you realize that Bush and Cheney are "pigs". Pity it took you so long. Nonsense - Mike's been noting that all along. You just can't process it because he includes the Dem's (as well as the Reps) in Congress in the group also. Once the Dem's are added, you guys zone out in a white hot fury and start hiding behind Lucky. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kelpdiver 2 #42 February 8, 2008 Quotewhat happens to romney's delegates? do they disappear? does he still get the votes at the convention? do they get divided between the remaining candidates? i'm confused. I don't know if they are actual named people (like Electors) with free will, or totally at his disposal. I believe they will tend to go to the person he throws his support to. Not positive that they have to do it. But reality is that he has so few that it won't matter. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Andrewwhyte 1 #43 February 8, 2008 Yes they are real people. I believe (but don't know) that bound delegates must vote publicly on the first ballot. I suspect it varies from state to state. In many states the primary selected delegates to the state convention. If the state convention has occurred, then the delegates to the national convention have been chosen. They are usually bound to vote for the no longer running candidate on the first round. On the second round they can vote how they like. If the state convention has not yet occurred I really don't know what happens. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #44 February 9, 2008 QuoteQuote Too bad they (Congress) think the answer is more spending and not pulling the pigs back from the trough. Finally you realize that Bush and Cheney are "pigs". Pity it took you so long. Go audit a "Reading is Fundamental" class, professor, then read my prior post again. When you do, you'll realize that I said "Congress" and not the Prez/VP, as Congress are the ones with control over the earmarks and pork barrels.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,148 #45 February 9, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuote Too bad they (Congress) think the answer is more spending and not pulling the pigs back from the trough. Finally you realize that Bush and Cheney are "pigs". Pity it took you so long. Go audit a "Reading is Fundamental" class, professor, then read my prior post again. When you do, you'll realize that I said "Congress" and not the Prez/VP, as Congress are the ones with control over the earmarks and pork barrels. Go back to Sentence Analysis class, dear boy. Apparently it's not your strong point. "Congress" is the subject, "pigs" is the object, not the complement, of "pull" in the predicate.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites needheadnow 0 #46 February 10, 2008 At the moment it would appear that John McCain has the best chance to get the Republican nomination. QuoteI would say this: John McCain doesn't have a chance in hell of beating the Establishment's chosen puppet, Hillary Clinton. Though they are both members of the Council on Foreign Relations, John McCain is simply an old war-mongering liberal with very little charm, while Hillary is a slick war-mongering liberal whose talent for deceit could give her husband a run for his money. Hillary has the most contributions from big corporations of any candidate. And to the delight of most Democrats, every single thing she advocates translates into more money out of our pockets and more government control over our lives. I doubt there is one Democrat in the country who would vote for liberal McCain over liberal Clinton. And because of the performance of George W. Bush, the Republican Party is toast anyway. Ron Paul is the Republican Party's one hope. In fact he is the only real Republican of the bunch. He has already brought most of us Libertarians into the party, if only temporarily in order to vote for him in primaries. And I know that many disillusioned awakening Democrats are supporting him. Dennis Kucinich has nothing but praise for him. Most importantly, regardless of who gets which nomination, Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate that would follow the Constitution and get this country turned around. All Paul has done for ten terms in Congress has been to follow the Constitution. The Constitution may not be perfect, but it is fundamentally correct, and most of the major problems the country faces are the result of not following the Constitution. If you haven't figured that out, you're simply not doing your homework. Of course our pathetic government schools won't teach you this. And the traitorous near blackout and misrepresentation of Ron Paul by the Establishment mainstream media doesn't help. But there is no longer any excuse for ignorance. The Establishment doesn't control the internet....YET! I've been doing my homework, including giving doomsayers a fair listen, for over thirty years. I've known of the machinations of the "Federal" Reserve since 1972, and now I finally have to say: WE'RE IN BIG TROUBLE! The country is bankrupt and our constitutional protections are all but gone. SO.... If you're happy with the direction the country is going in, be sure to vote for Clinton, Obama (The CFR's backup candidate), McCain, Romney or Huckabee, because I can say with absolute certainty that Clinton, or perhaps Obama will be elected. Here will be the "change" we've been promised: The US will continue to wreak death and destruction, and to recruit enemies as it attempts to police the world with its seven hundred military bases around the world. The Bill of Rights will continue to be ignored as we are spied on and searched. The falling dollar will continue to wipe out our savings as the criminal Federal Reserve prints phony money to pay for massive deficits. Health care, already severely crippled by government, will fall increasingly into the hands of federal politicians and bureaucrats. More vaccinations will be forced upon us. The bankruptcy of massive welfare monstrosities such as "Social Security" and "Medicare" will become more and more apparent. Your liberty and wallet will be increasingly looted in the name of the global warming scam. Our schools will continue to be pasteurized, homogenized and socialized into one-size-fits-all, politically correct, endoctrination factories. We'll have to show our "papers" at more and more locations. The US will continue to have the highest per capita prison population in the world as the INSANE "war on drugs" continues. People will continue to be put in jail for taking the most effective medicine available for certain illnesses. Aliens will continue to be lured to the US to receive "free" (stolen by government) goods and services, and to send money out of the country... Most tragically, the United States will continue to give away its sovereignty to World Government. THIS ABSOLUTELY POSITIVELY WILL HAPPEN! This is really what you want? The Ron Paul Revolution is still going strong, and will continue regardless of the outcome of the election. More and more people who foolishly thought that they needed to vote for "the lesser of two evils" are coming on board. And as Ron Paul so often says, it's not the man, it's the message of freedom that rings true! There is truly very little time left. If this revolution dies, our country dies with it. It's as simple as that. Supporting a presidential candidate other than Ron Paul is like competing in the Special Olympics: Even if you win you're still retarded. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 Next Page 2 of 2 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
kelpdiver 2 #31 February 8, 2008 It's not medical, it is deliberate action to differentiate himself from the elite, even though as a member of the Bush family, he certainly is part of it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #32 February 8, 2008 QuoteQuoteThat debate in 2000 probably won't be remembered, not nearly the way that Nixon in 1960 was, but it was one of those factors that pushed the edge over to Bush. I still think Diebold had more to do with the election than we will ever be allowed to know. No, not Bush looking good int he election, nor Gore looking like a buffoon. NO! CAN'T BE! BUSH IS A MORON AND GORE IS A GENIUS! NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! p.s. - NADER is more to blame than anything for Gore loosing it. Don't blame me - I voted for Harry Browne. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crwtom 0 #33 February 8, 2008 QuoteThe pundits are saying McCain should take Romney as his VP since he has a good conservative base and lots of money. I don't think those two like each other very much. Huckabee seems more the logical choice since he would help McCain carry the South. that's what Huckabee has effectively done - run for vice president. Split the conservative vote to hand the ticket to McCain, give him some more opportunities for publicity by staying in so that they can have a few more "cordial debates" and prove that he can carry the south and religious vote. In the end being perceived as to liberal may not be the biggest problem that McCain will have in the general election -- it is not too hard to make a case that he's the candidate closest to the current prez, who is not exactly popular. Just to name a few - He'll keep the US involved in Iraq longer than any other candidate, and much of his talk indicates he will not shy away from further military engagements. - He promises to appoint conservative judges to the supreme court. - He is been "establishment" longer than any of the other cadidates. - He (self admittedly) knows as little about economy as GWB. - Supported pretty much any initiative of GWB in last 2 year. - etc If it is true that his main strength is his appeal is to independent he is quite vulnerable. Thus far dem's not gone on the attack and tried to make him into "GWB II" - but it is not unlikely this will happen and discourage more than a few "independents". Cheers, T ******************************************************************* Fear causes hesitation, and hesitation will cause your worst fears to come true Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #34 February 8, 2008 QuoteQuote Nope. His SAT score demonstrates quite clearly that he is more intelligent than the majority of the public. Better than 2 in 3. What he chose to do with that ability is a different matter. reply] You assume that Daddy didn't buy those scores or that he didn't cheat? And you automatically assume that he did...Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites TrophyHusband 0 #35 February 8, 2008 what happens to romney's delegates? do they disappear? does he still get the votes at the convention? do they get divided between the remaining candidates? i'm confused. "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites DSE 5 #36 February 8, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuote Nope. His SAT score demonstrates quite clearly that he is more intelligent than the majority of the public. Better than 2 in 3. What he chose to do with that ability is a different matter. reply] You assume that Daddy didn't buy those scores or that he didn't cheat? And you automatically assume that he did... I assume that most significant events in George Bush' early life was bought, stolen, commandeered, fixed, manipulated, whatever. I'm jaded, admittedly. I do like Ryoder's medical example, that could explain a lot. But the callousness he shows towards poverty and lower-class people isn't a byproduct of Alszheimers, it's just a lack of compassion. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #37 February 8, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Nope. His SAT score demonstrates quite clearly that he is more intelligent than the majority of the public. Better than 2 in 3. What he chose to do with that ability is a different matter. reply] You assume that Daddy didn't buy those scores or that he didn't cheat? And you automatically assume that he did... I assume that most significant events in George Bush' early life was bought, stolen, commandeered, fixed, manipulated, whatever. I'm jaded, admittedly. I do like Ryoder's medical example, that could explain a lot. But the callousness he shows towards poverty and lower-class people isn't a byproduct of Alszheimers, it's just a lack of compassion. Lack of compassion? Tax cuts that took something over 10 *MILLION* additional working poor OFF the tax rolls is callous, in addition to a 25% increase in discretionary spending between 2001-2005? You must be working from a different dictionary than I am...Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,148 #38 February 8, 2008 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Nope. His SAT score demonstrates quite clearly that he is more intelligent than the majority of the public. Better than 2 in 3. What he chose to do with that ability is a different matter. reply] You assume that Daddy didn't buy those scores or that he didn't cheat? And you automatically assume that he did... I assume that most significant events in George Bush' early life was bought, stolen, commandeered, fixed, manipulated, whatever. I'm jaded, admittedly. I do like Ryoder's medical example, that could explain a lot. But the callousness he shows towards poverty and lower-class people isn't a byproduct of Alszheimers, it's just a lack of compassion. Lack of compassion? Tax cuts that took something over 10 *MILLION* additional working poor OFF the tax rolls is callous, in addition to a 25% increase in discretionary spending between 2001-2005? You must be working from a different dictionary than I am... Of course, at some time the resultant DEBT will have to be serviced. Seems that, despite the promises from the right, the economy hasn't responded to tax cuts the way we were told it would. So the answer is more "rebates". I wonder when China will foreclose on us.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #39 February 8, 2008 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Nope. His SAT score demonstrates quite clearly that he is more intelligent than the majority of the public. Better than 2 in 3. What he chose to do with that ability is a different matter. reply] You assume that Daddy didn't buy those scores or that he didn't cheat? And you automatically assume that he did... I assume that most significant events in George Bush' early life was bought, stolen, commandeered, fixed, manipulated, whatever. I'm jaded, admittedly. I do like Ryoder's medical example, that could explain a lot. But the callousness he shows towards poverty and lower-class people isn't a byproduct of Alszheimers, it's just a lack of compassion. Lack of compassion? Tax cuts that took something over 10 *MILLION* additional working poor OFF the tax rolls is callous, in addition to a 25% increase in discretionary spending between 2001-2005? You must be working from a different dictionary than I am... Of course, at some time the resultant DEBT will have to be serviced. Seems that, despite the promises from the right, the economy hasn't responded to tax cuts the way we were told it would. So the answer is more "rebates". I wonder when China will foreclose on us. Probably at some point after the Dems tax the businesses into the dirt and ruin the economy again. Too bad they (Congress) think the answer is more spending and not pulling the pigs back from the trough.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,148 #40 February 8, 2008 Quote Too bad they (Congress) think the answer is more spending and not pulling the pigs back from the trough. Finally you realize that Bush and Cheney are "pigs". Pity it took you so long.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rehmwa 2 #41 February 8, 2008 QuoteQuote Too bad they (Congress) think the answer is more spending and not pulling the pigs back from the trough. Finally you realize that Bush and Cheney are "pigs". Pity it took you so long. Nonsense - Mike's been noting that all along. You just can't process it because he includes the Dem's (as well as the Reps) in Congress in the group also. Once the Dem's are added, you guys zone out in a white hot fury and start hiding behind Lucky. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kelpdiver 2 #42 February 8, 2008 Quotewhat happens to romney's delegates? do they disappear? does he still get the votes at the convention? do they get divided between the remaining candidates? i'm confused. I don't know if they are actual named people (like Electors) with free will, or totally at his disposal. I believe they will tend to go to the person he throws his support to. Not positive that they have to do it. But reality is that he has so few that it won't matter. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Andrewwhyte 1 #43 February 8, 2008 Yes they are real people. I believe (but don't know) that bound delegates must vote publicly on the first ballot. I suspect it varies from state to state. In many states the primary selected delegates to the state convention. If the state convention has occurred, then the delegates to the national convention have been chosen. They are usually bound to vote for the no longer running candidate on the first round. On the second round they can vote how they like. If the state convention has not yet occurred I really don't know what happens. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #44 February 9, 2008 QuoteQuote Too bad they (Congress) think the answer is more spending and not pulling the pigs back from the trough. Finally you realize that Bush and Cheney are "pigs". Pity it took you so long. Go audit a "Reading is Fundamental" class, professor, then read my prior post again. When you do, you'll realize that I said "Congress" and not the Prez/VP, as Congress are the ones with control over the earmarks and pork barrels.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,148 #45 February 9, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuote Too bad they (Congress) think the answer is more spending and not pulling the pigs back from the trough. Finally you realize that Bush and Cheney are "pigs". Pity it took you so long. Go audit a "Reading is Fundamental" class, professor, then read my prior post again. When you do, you'll realize that I said "Congress" and not the Prez/VP, as Congress are the ones with control over the earmarks and pork barrels. Go back to Sentence Analysis class, dear boy. Apparently it's not your strong point. "Congress" is the subject, "pigs" is the object, not the complement, of "pull" in the predicate.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites needheadnow 0 #46 February 10, 2008 At the moment it would appear that John McCain has the best chance to get the Republican nomination. QuoteI would say this: John McCain doesn't have a chance in hell of beating the Establishment's chosen puppet, Hillary Clinton. Though they are both members of the Council on Foreign Relations, John McCain is simply an old war-mongering liberal with very little charm, while Hillary is a slick war-mongering liberal whose talent for deceit could give her husband a run for his money. Hillary has the most contributions from big corporations of any candidate. And to the delight of most Democrats, every single thing she advocates translates into more money out of our pockets and more government control over our lives. I doubt there is one Democrat in the country who would vote for liberal McCain over liberal Clinton. And because of the performance of George W. Bush, the Republican Party is toast anyway. Ron Paul is the Republican Party's one hope. In fact he is the only real Republican of the bunch. He has already brought most of us Libertarians into the party, if only temporarily in order to vote for him in primaries. And I know that many disillusioned awakening Democrats are supporting him. Dennis Kucinich has nothing but praise for him. Most importantly, regardless of who gets which nomination, Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate that would follow the Constitution and get this country turned around. All Paul has done for ten terms in Congress has been to follow the Constitution. The Constitution may not be perfect, but it is fundamentally correct, and most of the major problems the country faces are the result of not following the Constitution. If you haven't figured that out, you're simply not doing your homework. Of course our pathetic government schools won't teach you this. And the traitorous near blackout and misrepresentation of Ron Paul by the Establishment mainstream media doesn't help. But there is no longer any excuse for ignorance. The Establishment doesn't control the internet....YET! I've been doing my homework, including giving doomsayers a fair listen, for over thirty years. I've known of the machinations of the "Federal" Reserve since 1972, and now I finally have to say: WE'RE IN BIG TROUBLE! The country is bankrupt and our constitutional protections are all but gone. SO.... If you're happy with the direction the country is going in, be sure to vote for Clinton, Obama (The CFR's backup candidate), McCain, Romney or Huckabee, because I can say with absolute certainty that Clinton, or perhaps Obama will be elected. Here will be the "change" we've been promised: The US will continue to wreak death and destruction, and to recruit enemies as it attempts to police the world with its seven hundred military bases around the world. The Bill of Rights will continue to be ignored as we are spied on and searched. The falling dollar will continue to wipe out our savings as the criminal Federal Reserve prints phony money to pay for massive deficits. Health care, already severely crippled by government, will fall increasingly into the hands of federal politicians and bureaucrats. More vaccinations will be forced upon us. The bankruptcy of massive welfare monstrosities such as "Social Security" and "Medicare" will become more and more apparent. Your liberty and wallet will be increasingly looted in the name of the global warming scam. Our schools will continue to be pasteurized, homogenized and socialized into one-size-fits-all, politically correct, endoctrination factories. We'll have to show our "papers" at more and more locations. The US will continue to have the highest per capita prison population in the world as the INSANE "war on drugs" continues. People will continue to be put in jail for taking the most effective medicine available for certain illnesses. Aliens will continue to be lured to the US to receive "free" (stolen by government) goods and services, and to send money out of the country... Most tragically, the United States will continue to give away its sovereignty to World Government. THIS ABSOLUTELY POSITIVELY WILL HAPPEN! This is really what you want? The Ron Paul Revolution is still going strong, and will continue regardless of the outcome of the election. More and more people who foolishly thought that they needed to vote for "the lesser of two evils" are coming on board. And as Ron Paul so often says, it's not the man, it's the message of freedom that rings true! There is truly very little time left. If this revolution dies, our country dies with it. It's as simple as that. Supporting a presidential candidate other than Ron Paul is like competing in the Special Olympics: Even if you win you're still retarded. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 Next Page 2 of 2 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
TrophyHusband 0 #35 February 8, 2008 what happens to romney's delegates? do they disappear? does he still get the votes at the convention? do they get divided between the remaining candidates? i'm confused. "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DSE 5 #36 February 8, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuote Nope. His SAT score demonstrates quite clearly that he is more intelligent than the majority of the public. Better than 2 in 3. What he chose to do with that ability is a different matter. reply] You assume that Daddy didn't buy those scores or that he didn't cheat? And you automatically assume that he did... I assume that most significant events in George Bush' early life was bought, stolen, commandeered, fixed, manipulated, whatever. I'm jaded, admittedly. I do like Ryoder's medical example, that could explain a lot. But the callousness he shows towards poverty and lower-class people isn't a byproduct of Alszheimers, it's just a lack of compassion. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #37 February 8, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Nope. His SAT score demonstrates quite clearly that he is more intelligent than the majority of the public. Better than 2 in 3. What he chose to do with that ability is a different matter. reply] You assume that Daddy didn't buy those scores or that he didn't cheat? And you automatically assume that he did... I assume that most significant events in George Bush' early life was bought, stolen, commandeered, fixed, manipulated, whatever. I'm jaded, admittedly. I do like Ryoder's medical example, that could explain a lot. But the callousness he shows towards poverty and lower-class people isn't a byproduct of Alszheimers, it's just a lack of compassion. Lack of compassion? Tax cuts that took something over 10 *MILLION* additional working poor OFF the tax rolls is callous, in addition to a 25% increase in discretionary spending between 2001-2005? You must be working from a different dictionary than I am...Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,148 #38 February 8, 2008 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Nope. His SAT score demonstrates quite clearly that he is more intelligent than the majority of the public. Better than 2 in 3. What he chose to do with that ability is a different matter. reply] You assume that Daddy didn't buy those scores or that he didn't cheat? And you automatically assume that he did... I assume that most significant events in George Bush' early life was bought, stolen, commandeered, fixed, manipulated, whatever. I'm jaded, admittedly. I do like Ryoder's medical example, that could explain a lot. But the callousness he shows towards poverty and lower-class people isn't a byproduct of Alszheimers, it's just a lack of compassion. Lack of compassion? Tax cuts that took something over 10 *MILLION* additional working poor OFF the tax rolls is callous, in addition to a 25% increase in discretionary spending between 2001-2005? You must be working from a different dictionary than I am... Of course, at some time the resultant DEBT will have to be serviced. Seems that, despite the promises from the right, the economy hasn't responded to tax cuts the way we were told it would. So the answer is more "rebates". I wonder when China will foreclose on us.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #39 February 8, 2008 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Nope. His SAT score demonstrates quite clearly that he is more intelligent than the majority of the public. Better than 2 in 3. What he chose to do with that ability is a different matter. reply] You assume that Daddy didn't buy those scores or that he didn't cheat? And you automatically assume that he did... I assume that most significant events in George Bush' early life was bought, stolen, commandeered, fixed, manipulated, whatever. I'm jaded, admittedly. I do like Ryoder's medical example, that could explain a lot. But the callousness he shows towards poverty and lower-class people isn't a byproduct of Alszheimers, it's just a lack of compassion. Lack of compassion? Tax cuts that took something over 10 *MILLION* additional working poor OFF the tax rolls is callous, in addition to a 25% increase in discretionary spending between 2001-2005? You must be working from a different dictionary than I am... Of course, at some time the resultant DEBT will have to be serviced. Seems that, despite the promises from the right, the economy hasn't responded to tax cuts the way we were told it would. So the answer is more "rebates". I wonder when China will foreclose on us. Probably at some point after the Dems tax the businesses into the dirt and ruin the economy again. Too bad they (Congress) think the answer is more spending and not pulling the pigs back from the trough.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,148 #40 February 8, 2008 Quote Too bad they (Congress) think the answer is more spending and not pulling the pigs back from the trough. Finally you realize that Bush and Cheney are "pigs". Pity it took you so long.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rehmwa 2 #41 February 8, 2008 QuoteQuote Too bad they (Congress) think the answer is more spending and not pulling the pigs back from the trough. Finally you realize that Bush and Cheney are "pigs". Pity it took you so long. Nonsense - Mike's been noting that all along. You just can't process it because he includes the Dem's (as well as the Reps) in Congress in the group also. Once the Dem's are added, you guys zone out in a white hot fury and start hiding behind Lucky. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kelpdiver 2 #42 February 8, 2008 Quotewhat happens to romney's delegates? do they disappear? does he still get the votes at the convention? do they get divided between the remaining candidates? i'm confused. I don't know if they are actual named people (like Electors) with free will, or totally at his disposal. I believe they will tend to go to the person he throws his support to. Not positive that they have to do it. But reality is that he has so few that it won't matter. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Andrewwhyte 1 #43 February 8, 2008 Yes they are real people. I believe (but don't know) that bound delegates must vote publicly on the first ballot. I suspect it varies from state to state. In many states the primary selected delegates to the state convention. If the state convention has occurred, then the delegates to the national convention have been chosen. They are usually bound to vote for the no longer running candidate on the first round. On the second round they can vote how they like. If the state convention has not yet occurred I really don't know what happens. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #44 February 9, 2008 QuoteQuote Too bad they (Congress) think the answer is more spending and not pulling the pigs back from the trough. Finally you realize that Bush and Cheney are "pigs". Pity it took you so long. Go audit a "Reading is Fundamental" class, professor, then read my prior post again. When you do, you'll realize that I said "Congress" and not the Prez/VP, as Congress are the ones with control over the earmarks and pork barrels.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,148 #45 February 9, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuote Too bad they (Congress) think the answer is more spending and not pulling the pigs back from the trough. Finally you realize that Bush and Cheney are "pigs". Pity it took you so long. Go audit a "Reading is Fundamental" class, professor, then read my prior post again. When you do, you'll realize that I said "Congress" and not the Prez/VP, as Congress are the ones with control over the earmarks and pork barrels. Go back to Sentence Analysis class, dear boy. Apparently it's not your strong point. "Congress" is the subject, "pigs" is the object, not the complement, of "pull" in the predicate.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites needheadnow 0 #46 February 10, 2008 At the moment it would appear that John McCain has the best chance to get the Republican nomination. QuoteI would say this: John McCain doesn't have a chance in hell of beating the Establishment's chosen puppet, Hillary Clinton. Though they are both members of the Council on Foreign Relations, John McCain is simply an old war-mongering liberal with very little charm, while Hillary is a slick war-mongering liberal whose talent for deceit could give her husband a run for his money. Hillary has the most contributions from big corporations of any candidate. And to the delight of most Democrats, every single thing she advocates translates into more money out of our pockets and more government control over our lives. I doubt there is one Democrat in the country who would vote for liberal McCain over liberal Clinton. And because of the performance of George W. Bush, the Republican Party is toast anyway. Ron Paul is the Republican Party's one hope. In fact he is the only real Republican of the bunch. He has already brought most of us Libertarians into the party, if only temporarily in order to vote for him in primaries. And I know that many disillusioned awakening Democrats are supporting him. Dennis Kucinich has nothing but praise for him. Most importantly, regardless of who gets which nomination, Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate that would follow the Constitution and get this country turned around. All Paul has done for ten terms in Congress has been to follow the Constitution. The Constitution may not be perfect, but it is fundamentally correct, and most of the major problems the country faces are the result of not following the Constitution. If you haven't figured that out, you're simply not doing your homework. Of course our pathetic government schools won't teach you this. And the traitorous near blackout and misrepresentation of Ron Paul by the Establishment mainstream media doesn't help. But there is no longer any excuse for ignorance. The Establishment doesn't control the internet....YET! I've been doing my homework, including giving doomsayers a fair listen, for over thirty years. I've known of the machinations of the "Federal" Reserve since 1972, and now I finally have to say: WE'RE IN BIG TROUBLE! The country is bankrupt and our constitutional protections are all but gone. SO.... If you're happy with the direction the country is going in, be sure to vote for Clinton, Obama (The CFR's backup candidate), McCain, Romney or Huckabee, because I can say with absolute certainty that Clinton, or perhaps Obama will be elected. Here will be the "change" we've been promised: The US will continue to wreak death and destruction, and to recruit enemies as it attempts to police the world with its seven hundred military bases around the world. The Bill of Rights will continue to be ignored as we are spied on and searched. The falling dollar will continue to wipe out our savings as the criminal Federal Reserve prints phony money to pay for massive deficits. Health care, already severely crippled by government, will fall increasingly into the hands of federal politicians and bureaucrats. More vaccinations will be forced upon us. The bankruptcy of massive welfare monstrosities such as "Social Security" and "Medicare" will become more and more apparent. Your liberty and wallet will be increasingly looted in the name of the global warming scam. Our schools will continue to be pasteurized, homogenized and socialized into one-size-fits-all, politically correct, endoctrination factories. We'll have to show our "papers" at more and more locations. The US will continue to have the highest per capita prison population in the world as the INSANE "war on drugs" continues. People will continue to be put in jail for taking the most effective medicine available for certain illnesses. Aliens will continue to be lured to the US to receive "free" (stolen by government) goods and services, and to send money out of the country... Most tragically, the United States will continue to give away its sovereignty to World Government. THIS ABSOLUTELY POSITIVELY WILL HAPPEN! This is really what you want? The Ron Paul Revolution is still going strong, and will continue regardless of the outcome of the election. More and more people who foolishly thought that they needed to vote for "the lesser of two evils" are coming on board. And as Ron Paul so often says, it's not the man, it's the message of freedom that rings true! There is truly very little time left. If this revolution dies, our country dies with it. It's as simple as that. Supporting a presidential candidate other than Ron Paul is like competing in the Special Olympics: Even if you win you're still retarded. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 Next Page 2 of 2 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
mnealtx 0 #37 February 8, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuote Nope. His SAT score demonstrates quite clearly that he is more intelligent than the majority of the public. Better than 2 in 3. What he chose to do with that ability is a different matter. reply] You assume that Daddy didn't buy those scores or that he didn't cheat? And you automatically assume that he did... I assume that most significant events in George Bush' early life was bought, stolen, commandeered, fixed, manipulated, whatever. I'm jaded, admittedly. I do like Ryoder's medical example, that could explain a lot. But the callousness he shows towards poverty and lower-class people isn't a byproduct of Alszheimers, it's just a lack of compassion. Lack of compassion? Tax cuts that took something over 10 *MILLION* additional working poor OFF the tax rolls is callous, in addition to a 25% increase in discretionary spending between 2001-2005? You must be working from a different dictionary than I am...Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,148 #38 February 8, 2008 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Nope. His SAT score demonstrates quite clearly that he is more intelligent than the majority of the public. Better than 2 in 3. What he chose to do with that ability is a different matter. reply] You assume that Daddy didn't buy those scores or that he didn't cheat? And you automatically assume that he did... I assume that most significant events in George Bush' early life was bought, stolen, commandeered, fixed, manipulated, whatever. I'm jaded, admittedly. I do like Ryoder's medical example, that could explain a lot. But the callousness he shows towards poverty and lower-class people isn't a byproduct of Alszheimers, it's just a lack of compassion. Lack of compassion? Tax cuts that took something over 10 *MILLION* additional working poor OFF the tax rolls is callous, in addition to a 25% increase in discretionary spending between 2001-2005? You must be working from a different dictionary than I am... Of course, at some time the resultant DEBT will have to be serviced. Seems that, despite the promises from the right, the economy hasn't responded to tax cuts the way we were told it would. So the answer is more "rebates". I wonder when China will foreclose on us.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #39 February 8, 2008 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Nope. His SAT score demonstrates quite clearly that he is more intelligent than the majority of the public. Better than 2 in 3. What he chose to do with that ability is a different matter. reply] You assume that Daddy didn't buy those scores or that he didn't cheat? And you automatically assume that he did... I assume that most significant events in George Bush' early life was bought, stolen, commandeered, fixed, manipulated, whatever. I'm jaded, admittedly. I do like Ryoder's medical example, that could explain a lot. But the callousness he shows towards poverty and lower-class people isn't a byproduct of Alszheimers, it's just a lack of compassion. Lack of compassion? Tax cuts that took something over 10 *MILLION* additional working poor OFF the tax rolls is callous, in addition to a 25% increase in discretionary spending between 2001-2005? You must be working from a different dictionary than I am... Of course, at some time the resultant DEBT will have to be serviced. Seems that, despite the promises from the right, the economy hasn't responded to tax cuts the way we were told it would. So the answer is more "rebates". I wonder when China will foreclose on us. Probably at some point after the Dems tax the businesses into the dirt and ruin the economy again. Too bad they (Congress) think the answer is more spending and not pulling the pigs back from the trough.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,148 #40 February 8, 2008 Quote Too bad they (Congress) think the answer is more spending and not pulling the pigs back from the trough. Finally you realize that Bush and Cheney are "pigs". Pity it took you so long.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rehmwa 2 #41 February 8, 2008 QuoteQuote Too bad they (Congress) think the answer is more spending and not pulling the pigs back from the trough. Finally you realize that Bush and Cheney are "pigs". Pity it took you so long. Nonsense - Mike's been noting that all along. You just can't process it because he includes the Dem's (as well as the Reps) in Congress in the group also. Once the Dem's are added, you guys zone out in a white hot fury and start hiding behind Lucky. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kelpdiver 2 #42 February 8, 2008 Quotewhat happens to romney's delegates? do they disappear? does he still get the votes at the convention? do they get divided between the remaining candidates? i'm confused. I don't know if they are actual named people (like Electors) with free will, or totally at his disposal. I believe they will tend to go to the person he throws his support to. Not positive that they have to do it. But reality is that he has so few that it won't matter. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Andrewwhyte 1 #43 February 8, 2008 Yes they are real people. I believe (but don't know) that bound delegates must vote publicly on the first ballot. I suspect it varies from state to state. In many states the primary selected delegates to the state convention. If the state convention has occurred, then the delegates to the national convention have been chosen. They are usually bound to vote for the no longer running candidate on the first round. On the second round they can vote how they like. If the state convention has not yet occurred I really don't know what happens. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mnealtx 0 #44 February 9, 2008 QuoteQuote Too bad they (Congress) think the answer is more spending and not pulling the pigs back from the trough. Finally you realize that Bush and Cheney are "pigs". Pity it took you so long. Go audit a "Reading is Fundamental" class, professor, then read my prior post again. When you do, you'll realize that I said "Congress" and not the Prez/VP, as Congress are the ones with control over the earmarks and pork barrels.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 2,148 #45 February 9, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuote Too bad they (Congress) think the answer is more spending and not pulling the pigs back from the trough. Finally you realize that Bush and Cheney are "pigs". Pity it took you so long. Go audit a "Reading is Fundamental" class, professor, then read my prior post again. When you do, you'll realize that I said "Congress" and not the Prez/VP, as Congress are the ones with control over the earmarks and pork barrels. Go back to Sentence Analysis class, dear boy. Apparently it's not your strong point. "Congress" is the subject, "pigs" is the object, not the complement, of "pull" in the predicate.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites needheadnow 0 #46 February 10, 2008 At the moment it would appear that John McCain has the best chance to get the Republican nomination. QuoteI would say this: John McCain doesn't have a chance in hell of beating the Establishment's chosen puppet, Hillary Clinton. Though they are both members of the Council on Foreign Relations, John McCain is simply an old war-mongering liberal with very little charm, while Hillary is a slick war-mongering liberal whose talent for deceit could give her husband a run for his money. Hillary has the most contributions from big corporations of any candidate. And to the delight of most Democrats, every single thing she advocates translates into more money out of our pockets and more government control over our lives. I doubt there is one Democrat in the country who would vote for liberal McCain over liberal Clinton. And because of the performance of George W. Bush, the Republican Party is toast anyway. Ron Paul is the Republican Party's one hope. In fact he is the only real Republican of the bunch. He has already brought most of us Libertarians into the party, if only temporarily in order to vote for him in primaries. And I know that many disillusioned awakening Democrats are supporting him. Dennis Kucinich has nothing but praise for him. Most importantly, regardless of who gets which nomination, Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate that would follow the Constitution and get this country turned around. All Paul has done for ten terms in Congress has been to follow the Constitution. The Constitution may not be perfect, but it is fundamentally correct, and most of the major problems the country faces are the result of not following the Constitution. If you haven't figured that out, you're simply not doing your homework. Of course our pathetic government schools won't teach you this. And the traitorous near blackout and misrepresentation of Ron Paul by the Establishment mainstream media doesn't help. But there is no longer any excuse for ignorance. The Establishment doesn't control the internet....YET! I've been doing my homework, including giving doomsayers a fair listen, for over thirty years. I've known of the machinations of the "Federal" Reserve since 1972, and now I finally have to say: WE'RE IN BIG TROUBLE! The country is bankrupt and our constitutional protections are all but gone. SO.... If you're happy with the direction the country is going in, be sure to vote for Clinton, Obama (The CFR's backup candidate), McCain, Romney or Huckabee, because I can say with absolute certainty that Clinton, or perhaps Obama will be elected. Here will be the "change" we've been promised: The US will continue to wreak death and destruction, and to recruit enemies as it attempts to police the world with its seven hundred military bases around the world. The Bill of Rights will continue to be ignored as we are spied on and searched. The falling dollar will continue to wipe out our savings as the criminal Federal Reserve prints phony money to pay for massive deficits. Health care, already severely crippled by government, will fall increasingly into the hands of federal politicians and bureaucrats. More vaccinations will be forced upon us. The bankruptcy of massive welfare monstrosities such as "Social Security" and "Medicare" will become more and more apparent. Your liberty and wallet will be increasingly looted in the name of the global warming scam. Our schools will continue to be pasteurized, homogenized and socialized into one-size-fits-all, politically correct, endoctrination factories. We'll have to show our "papers" at more and more locations. The US will continue to have the highest per capita prison population in the world as the INSANE "war on drugs" continues. People will continue to be put in jail for taking the most effective medicine available for certain illnesses. Aliens will continue to be lured to the US to receive "free" (stolen by government) goods and services, and to send money out of the country... Most tragically, the United States will continue to give away its sovereignty to World Government. THIS ABSOLUTELY POSITIVELY WILL HAPPEN! This is really what you want? The Ron Paul Revolution is still going strong, and will continue regardless of the outcome of the election. More and more people who foolishly thought that they needed to vote for "the lesser of two evils" are coming on board. And as Ron Paul so often says, it's not the man, it's the message of freedom that rings true! There is truly very little time left. If this revolution dies, our country dies with it. It's as simple as that. Supporting a presidential candidate other than Ron Paul is like competing in the Special Olympics: Even if you win you're still retarded. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 Next Page 2 of 2 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
kallend 2,148 #38 February 8, 2008 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Nope. His SAT score demonstrates quite clearly that he is more intelligent than the majority of the public. Better than 2 in 3. What he chose to do with that ability is a different matter. reply] You assume that Daddy didn't buy those scores or that he didn't cheat? And you automatically assume that he did... I assume that most significant events in George Bush' early life was bought, stolen, commandeered, fixed, manipulated, whatever. I'm jaded, admittedly. I do like Ryoder's medical example, that could explain a lot. But the callousness he shows towards poverty and lower-class people isn't a byproduct of Alszheimers, it's just a lack of compassion. Lack of compassion? Tax cuts that took something over 10 *MILLION* additional working poor OFF the tax rolls is callous, in addition to a 25% increase in discretionary spending between 2001-2005? You must be working from a different dictionary than I am... Of course, at some time the resultant DEBT will have to be serviced. Seems that, despite the promises from the right, the economy hasn't responded to tax cuts the way we were told it would. So the answer is more "rebates". I wonder when China will foreclose on us.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #39 February 8, 2008 Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Quote Nope. His SAT score demonstrates quite clearly that he is more intelligent than the majority of the public. Better than 2 in 3. What he chose to do with that ability is a different matter. reply] You assume that Daddy didn't buy those scores or that he didn't cheat? And you automatically assume that he did... I assume that most significant events in George Bush' early life was bought, stolen, commandeered, fixed, manipulated, whatever. I'm jaded, admittedly. I do like Ryoder's medical example, that could explain a lot. But the callousness he shows towards poverty and lower-class people isn't a byproduct of Alszheimers, it's just a lack of compassion. Lack of compassion? Tax cuts that took something over 10 *MILLION* additional working poor OFF the tax rolls is callous, in addition to a 25% increase in discretionary spending between 2001-2005? You must be working from a different dictionary than I am... Of course, at some time the resultant DEBT will have to be serviced. Seems that, despite the promises from the right, the economy hasn't responded to tax cuts the way we were told it would. So the answer is more "rebates". I wonder when China will foreclose on us. Probably at some point after the Dems tax the businesses into the dirt and ruin the economy again. Too bad they (Congress) think the answer is more spending and not pulling the pigs back from the trough.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #40 February 8, 2008 Quote Too bad they (Congress) think the answer is more spending and not pulling the pigs back from the trough. Finally you realize that Bush and Cheney are "pigs". Pity it took you so long.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #41 February 8, 2008 QuoteQuote Too bad they (Congress) think the answer is more spending and not pulling the pigs back from the trough. Finally you realize that Bush and Cheney are "pigs". Pity it took you so long. Nonsense - Mike's been noting that all along. You just can't process it because he includes the Dem's (as well as the Reps) in Congress in the group also. Once the Dem's are added, you guys zone out in a white hot fury and start hiding behind Lucky. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #42 February 8, 2008 Quotewhat happens to romney's delegates? do they disappear? does he still get the votes at the convention? do they get divided between the remaining candidates? i'm confused. I don't know if they are actual named people (like Electors) with free will, or totally at his disposal. I believe they will tend to go to the person he throws his support to. Not positive that they have to do it. But reality is that he has so few that it won't matter. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andrewwhyte 1 #43 February 8, 2008 Yes they are real people. I believe (but don't know) that bound delegates must vote publicly on the first ballot. I suspect it varies from state to state. In many states the primary selected delegates to the state convention. If the state convention has occurred, then the delegates to the national convention have been chosen. They are usually bound to vote for the no longer running candidate on the first round. On the second round they can vote how they like. If the state convention has not yet occurred I really don't know what happens. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #44 February 9, 2008 QuoteQuote Too bad they (Congress) think the answer is more spending and not pulling the pigs back from the trough. Finally you realize that Bush and Cheney are "pigs". Pity it took you so long. Go audit a "Reading is Fundamental" class, professor, then read my prior post again. When you do, you'll realize that I said "Congress" and not the Prez/VP, as Congress are the ones with control over the earmarks and pork barrels.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,148 #45 February 9, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuote Too bad they (Congress) think the answer is more spending and not pulling the pigs back from the trough. Finally you realize that Bush and Cheney are "pigs". Pity it took you so long. Go audit a "Reading is Fundamental" class, professor, then read my prior post again. When you do, you'll realize that I said "Congress" and not the Prez/VP, as Congress are the ones with control over the earmarks and pork barrels. Go back to Sentence Analysis class, dear boy. Apparently it's not your strong point. "Congress" is the subject, "pigs" is the object, not the complement, of "pull" in the predicate.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
needheadnow 0 #46 February 10, 2008 At the moment it would appear that John McCain has the best chance to get the Republican nomination. QuoteI would say this: John McCain doesn't have a chance in hell of beating the Establishment's chosen puppet, Hillary Clinton. Though they are both members of the Council on Foreign Relations, John McCain is simply an old war-mongering liberal with very little charm, while Hillary is a slick war-mongering liberal whose talent for deceit could give her husband a run for his money. Hillary has the most contributions from big corporations of any candidate. And to the delight of most Democrats, every single thing she advocates translates into more money out of our pockets and more government control over our lives. I doubt there is one Democrat in the country who would vote for liberal McCain over liberal Clinton. And because of the performance of George W. Bush, the Republican Party is toast anyway. Ron Paul is the Republican Party's one hope. In fact he is the only real Republican of the bunch. He has already brought most of us Libertarians into the party, if only temporarily in order to vote for him in primaries. And I know that many disillusioned awakening Democrats are supporting him. Dennis Kucinich has nothing but praise for him. Most importantly, regardless of who gets which nomination, Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate that would follow the Constitution and get this country turned around. All Paul has done for ten terms in Congress has been to follow the Constitution. The Constitution may not be perfect, but it is fundamentally correct, and most of the major problems the country faces are the result of not following the Constitution. If you haven't figured that out, you're simply not doing your homework. Of course our pathetic government schools won't teach you this. And the traitorous near blackout and misrepresentation of Ron Paul by the Establishment mainstream media doesn't help. But there is no longer any excuse for ignorance. The Establishment doesn't control the internet....YET! I've been doing my homework, including giving doomsayers a fair listen, for over thirty years. I've known of the machinations of the "Federal" Reserve since 1972, and now I finally have to say: WE'RE IN BIG TROUBLE! The country is bankrupt and our constitutional protections are all but gone. SO.... If you're happy with the direction the country is going in, be sure to vote for Clinton, Obama (The CFR's backup candidate), McCain, Romney or Huckabee, because I can say with absolute certainty that Clinton, or perhaps Obama will be elected. Here will be the "change" we've been promised: The US will continue to wreak death and destruction, and to recruit enemies as it attempts to police the world with its seven hundred military bases around the world. The Bill of Rights will continue to be ignored as we are spied on and searched. The falling dollar will continue to wipe out our savings as the criminal Federal Reserve prints phony money to pay for massive deficits. Health care, already severely crippled by government, will fall increasingly into the hands of federal politicians and bureaucrats. More vaccinations will be forced upon us. The bankruptcy of massive welfare monstrosities such as "Social Security" and "Medicare" will become more and more apparent. Your liberty and wallet will be increasingly looted in the name of the global warming scam. Our schools will continue to be pasteurized, homogenized and socialized into one-size-fits-all, politically correct, endoctrination factories. We'll have to show our "papers" at more and more locations. The US will continue to have the highest per capita prison population in the world as the INSANE "war on drugs" continues. People will continue to be put in jail for taking the most effective medicine available for certain illnesses. Aliens will continue to be lured to the US to receive "free" (stolen by government) goods and services, and to send money out of the country... Most tragically, the United States will continue to give away its sovereignty to World Government. THIS ABSOLUTELY POSITIVELY WILL HAPPEN! This is really what you want? The Ron Paul Revolution is still going strong, and will continue regardless of the outcome of the election. More and more people who foolishly thought that they needed to vote for "the lesser of two evils" are coming on board. And as Ron Paul so often says, it's not the man, it's the message of freedom that rings true! There is truly very little time left. If this revolution dies, our country dies with it. It's as simple as that. Supporting a presidential candidate other than Ron Paul is like competing in the Special Olympics: Even if you win you're still retarded. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
